Corals & lasers, wildlife & x-rays, morphology & machine learning.
Currently working on wildlife provenance and conservation research using ML and X-rays.
Jesus christ @Zoom do you really have to update and re-install every time I need to join a meeting? How much could have changed between now and last week? 😅
One one hand, AI could bring mass unemployment and hypercharge wealth inequality.
On the other, it can tell me how to adjust legends in ggplot in seconds and provide example code.
I, for one, welcome our new silicon overlords🤖
#ChatGPT#AcademicTwitter#R#ggplot#AI
Our new meta-analysis exploring the determinants of predator recognition in global small mammals is out now open access in @ConBiology
https://t.co/pMtF1MpUUd
Are you new to writing grants, or want to see some examples of proposals to different private and public agencies?
All of our successful and failed proposals that are not restricted from sharing are publicly available here: https://t.co/B190tbzYEq
@Drew_Lab Thanks for the shoutout @Drew_Lab! Scaling is always an interesting problem, especially in complex ecosystems. Double that for organisms as complex as corals 😅
I think that with increasing public access to AI art generators like #StableDiffusion, #dalle2 and #midjourney there will be a move toward, and market for, AI-art-frames; think super high quality OLED wall mounted displays to showcase your own generative art at home.
Couldn't @arxiv and other pre-print servers have an option to review articles? Reviewers would need an #ORCID so the process becomes open; reducing a bunch of bad review practices. Update and then, boom, certified peer reviewed?🤷♂️1/9
My postdoc & I have had a manuscript under review for 9 months & today it was returned to us bc they said they were unable to find suitable reviewers.
Has this happened to anyone else? I’m completely shocked & frustrated.
A full, publicly available record of the peer review process, allowing papers to rapidly be updated and contributed to by the broader community without insane publication costs and waiting times. Surely a better idea than the current system? 9/9