Jazz

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@WolfofX @grok What was the outcome

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@lasse108 Thanks, now it’ll be -5% before the close

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@PekkaMatil53388 @veikkohaapala @SakariPuisto Ne on vaan kyselyitä, vastaavasti uuden tuotannon verkkoonliityntäkyselyitä on kumulatiivisesti luokkaa 400GW. Valtaosaa ei tietysti rakenneta

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

Datakeskusten käyttöaste on luokkaa 60% kokonaiskulutuskapasiteetista, täten jäädään 1,6TWh/vuosi. Mikäli käyttöaste olisi 100%, olisi kulutus ollut luokkaa 2,5TWh/vuosi. Eli jos jutussa mainittu arvio pitää kutinsa ja käyttöaste pysyy myös tulevien datakeskusten osalta on 60%:ssa, niin 2030 vuonna Suomessa olisi noin 1000MW verran datakeskuskapasiteettia tuon 5-6TWh kulutuksen perusteella laskettuna

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@TheBigBerbowski @CKCapitalxx Exactly

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@earnings_guy Its gonna crash (im holding)

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@structuralmkt @kevinxu Today after the bell, right?

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@EkpoIruoghene8 Randy Bobandy

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@calvinfroedge Did they equip caskets with an internet connection during the dot-com boom?

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@GxEorge_ Corolla beats it

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@Moroccannnnnnn @AntSpeaks Ok morocco rules and spain/ceuta is a shithole, but moroccans want to go there anyway

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

For spain its a useless burden and expense to try to keep africans out of there. For morocco its going to expand the country’s area by minor amount and they would get to see how it would be to live infrastructurally advanced area, but eventually it will turn into ruins and desert just like rest of the country due to not having any idea how to run a country in a way that it prospers. Therefore i recommend using ceuta as a nuclear bomb testing site

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@euriborbot Tomorrow >3%

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@lasse108 $BAK

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@jackprandelli Who is going to bomb it first, Houthis or Iran?

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@lasse108 *$2000

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@LeopoldATracker He should buy majority stake in $VIVO and actually run the business.

[Jazz @LabRatJazz]

@0xbags And

[Aakash Gupta @aakashgupta]

You check your Apple Watch in the morning. Sleep score: 62. You decide it's going to be a foggy day. And then it is.

A 2014 Colorado College study suggests the score itself causes the fog.

164 people walked into a lab. Researchers hooked them up to fake EEG equipment and told them the readout would show their REM percentage from the night before. Then they fabricated a number. Half the room was told 28.7%. Half was told 16.2%. The machine wasn't measuring anything.

Participants took four cognitive tests. The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, where you add numbers spoken at increasing speed and hold your last sum in working memory while computing the next. And the Controlled Oral Word Association Task, where you generate as many words as you can starting with a single letter under time pressure. Both are gold-standard measures of attention and executive function used in clinical neurology.

The 28.7% group outperformed the 16.2% group on both. Significantly. How rested participants actually felt that morning predicted nothing.

The mechanism is mindset priming an executive resource. When you believe you slept well, you allocate cognitive effort more aggressively. You don't conserve. You don't pre-disengage. Belief about the resource changes how you spend it.

Two control conditions ruled out demand characteristics. Participants weren't trying harder because they thought they should. Real measurable cognitive performance shifted with the number on the readout.

The Apple Watch sleep score. The Oura ring readiness number. The morning ritual of checking either one is taxing the resource you're about to need.

The performance gap from a fabricated REM percentage was larger than the gap from how rested participants actually felt. The number was louder than the night.