@SusanCowell But why not? You won’t need an invasive and costly treatment if you catch cancer early. Nationwide screening of vulnerable groups is literally the single best way to save you (the tax payer) money.
@Juvelad@michaelpforan What a stupid comment. There was a court case, @ForWomenScot won. The discussion of the law doesn’t need to be balanced, in needs to explain why one side is correct and the other is incorrect.
@IgorRriabov@RichardDawkins Maybe when a fresian cow gives birth to a male calf, we can graft on a pair of silicon udders and start trying to milk it.
Or when male chicks hatch, we could dress them in tutus and hope they also start laying eggs.
Idiot.
@IgorRriabov@RichardDawkins Dumbest take I’ve ever heard.
Tell what application does this have in agriculture? Because surely, if there were any application what so ever it would already be producing a profit.
@ThomasWillett9 This is very illuminating! No wonder you’re so ill informed, opinions produced by a micky mouse degree instead of any real life experience of feminist activism.
Remember that time you stood outside a women’s conference while a survivor of sex trafficking inside was telling her story and you and the group you were with shouted “blow jobs are real jobs” through megaphones at her?
Imagine if the gender-criticals highlighted the issue of 1.6 million UK women suffering from endo, or the 200 women who report rape daily or even the 1100+ women every week who their employers discriminate against because they are pregnant.
But no, it's all about trans women
You tried to get the whole conference cancelled. The conference had NOTHING to do with trans, which was apparently the issue, a women’s rights conference which didn’t include and discussion on transwomen issues because those are men’s issues.