Andrew G 🇺🇸

Husband, father of 4, attorney, Marine, conservative in exile. 🇺🇸 ✝️ #ChristIsKing #SemperFi #DukeLaw

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@NeruObsessed @noarawrrr @RyanHallwork88 @contramordor “Loli obsessed Chud Lord”

You’ve got to be kidding me.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@BobbyApocalypse @disclosetv I agree Americans don’t want this war and I assume Cubans don’t want it either, but not sure what the relevance of that is. Whether we support it or not, our government is going to invade them; and whether they want it or not, their only choices are to surrender or to fight.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@EWess92 Pretty clearly IMO Roberts was giving contrived attention to Thomas’ solo dissent the whole time because he intended to use Thomas to bootstrap in the constitutional issue, which he otherwise had no business getting to.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@Lola90408 @Acyn He did in fact point out Saudi Arabia as an example of that and said he opposes that too.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@AlterEgon75 @LeroyTheElk Century Schoolbook vs. Century Expanded

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@scott_kernen A combination of: Small donors giving to candidate committees instead of the DNC, big Jewish donors mistrusting the DNC, and other big donors fearing Trump admin targeting/retaliation for supporting the DNC.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@Thecouchcoach11 @alexbronzini Pointing out that she did not in fact concede when the article claimed she did in fact concede is not mere semantics. Not even close. It is quite literally the whole ballgame.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@yappingautist @MjjjolNoir7 @cmalex79 @AmericanReform_ That’s not what he said; that was your emotional read of what he said. He said we should discontinue H-1B while also recognizing that we should try to solve some of the problems that led companies to want them in the first place.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@NateSilver538 I mean it’s obviously a problem but there’s no mystery why it takes so long: their laws allow for the curing of mail ballots that fail, e.g., signature verification. They prioritize counting every single legitimate voter over the appearance of legitimacy to a ridiculous degree.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@CharlieManader @Yodhaa_warrior @Rocket_Goblin2 Just to clarify, this is not a ranking of unicorn startups IN each of these countries; this is a ranking of unicorn U.S. startups based on the country of birth of the founder. The better denominator for comparison is the number of foreign borns from Canada and India in the U.S.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@DanRodman11 @CathryneStone1 @PenguinSix LOL! MAGAs demonstrably do in fact do that. Even putting aside the laughably false nature of your claim, if you ever find yourself making a broad statement about what 70 million people categorically “don’t do,” know that you’re probably overclaiming.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@CathryneStone1 @DanRodman11 @PenguinSix I like how at no point you considered the possibility that it might’ve been one of you guys, upset about her voting on big ticket issues, who tried to SWAT her.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@HumanNatureX @JamieBonkiewicz No, the point is that MAGA leaders are telling their supporters not to send their kids to woke institutions like Harvard while they send their own kids there. It’s just proof MAGA leaders are lying when they say it’s a waste of time and money and are screwing their supporters.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@VicinageClause @varadmehta @EWess92 @charlescwcooke @UT_Civitas The Takings argument, in my view, is a much stronger one, but even there it’s hard to see why taxing at 100% is a taking when taxing at 40% isn’t. I am taking 100% of 40% of your income when I have a 40% rate, so if that isn’t a taking then when precisely does a tax become one?

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@VicinageClause @varadmehta @EWess92 @charlescwcooke @UT_Civitas Hard line to draw because States have long been understood to have the power to tax settlements paid from the Judgment Fund. If 40% is fine, is 60% too much? 80%? Is only 100% preempted? Why? Is there a manageable standard or should we wait for express preemption (cf. Rucho)?

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@scotus_wire @chriswithans @SJonNantucket That’s not quite right. There is a map. A SCOTUS decision is not a writ of erasure, and Purcell would counsel against enjoining the State from using its existing map.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@BothaBAlex @Samsonn_____ @RichardHanania I agree that his point is silly, but I don’t know why you feel the need to say “they.” Your profile pretty obviously indicates you’re Indian. Be proud of who you are. You are allowed to participate in this discussion as our Creator made you.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@r0b0t_sp1der @litrllyBased To be clear, I’m not calling you an unserious retard. I’m saying those who actually advocate the position (many of your repliers) are. This is a fair thought experiment that proves why those people are unserious retards.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@r0b0t_sp1der @litrllyBased Obviously H-1B shouldn’t be eliminated over night. Anyone advocating that position is an unserious retard. We should simply halt new issuances while continuing renewals (with steadily increasing fees). In time, the system will sort itself out without any major disruption.

[Andrew G 🇺🇸 @LakeShowLeg]

@Samsonn_____ @RichardHanania And I addressed the others too. Just like I’m not going to pretend that my opposition to H-1B is because “Samson from Twitter” is smarter than the average H-1B, I don’t base my position on whether “Samson from Twitter” is sufficiently sexually attracted to a given H-1B either.