jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤

Anarchia, globalizm i wolność

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@Raszakkk Pomiędzy nami jest taka różnica, że my mamy rację

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@SkorchVoluntary Doesn't really answer my question. The fact that we do that currently doesn't mean that we do this right

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@TheDread24 @ZoomerIsland I think that in this case „morally acceptable” actually means if it is ethical. That's what I have assumed

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@SkorchVoluntary @ZoomerIsland It isn't. But how do you estimate the value of human life and how do you compensate someone who is dead because of you? Death penalty in NAP only exists because you can't compensate for murdering someone

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@SkorchVoluntary @ZoomerIsland Forcing someone to compensate for the losses does in fact fit the libertarian definition of aggression. Other than that idk what to tell you, I am literally repeating what Rothbard already said about his own principle

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@SkorchVoluntary @ZoomerIsland That's not true. In case of breaking someone property NAP allows using aggression on the person who broke it in order to compensate for the losses, this obviously happens after the property is already destroyed. You should read ethics of liberty where he explained exactly that

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@SkorchVoluntary @ZoomerIsland NAP allows counter-aggression on people who have initiated aggression. Rothbard argued that people who initiate aggression lose the exact rights they have violated therefore the death penalty for murderers is within the NAP

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@AVERYK79 @phukyerpheefees @LPNH Holy strawman

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH Read „Ethics of liberty” or „Libertarian manifesto”. in Libertarianism you become an owner of property by altering previously unowned property. Also typing „Another L” doesn't make your argument better

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH Yes, If it is unowned

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH And I never said that you claimed that I pointed out that the example doesn't work because the purchased property was already owned.

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH You purchase property from someone who owns it

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH You quite literally did.
„if it isn't yours, don't fuck with it.” implies that it is somehow wrong to „fuck” with unowned property. Your line of thinking is essentially flawed

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH the specification that the property is owned at the moment is literally irrelevant as you claimed that you can't use unowned property and if you can't use it you can't own it.

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH This doesn't change a thing. My point still stands

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH Yeah, no. This implies that you can't own previously unowned property which just isn't true

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

@phukyerpheefees @LPNH State property isn't legitimate as it is funded by theft, also the pole appears to be placed on her lawn

[jakub Gierlach🐍💛🖤 @Laki_lib]

Hitler uważał ich obu za podludzi btw

[Libertarian Party @LPNational]

Statement on the Disaffiliation of LPNH
“The resolution to disaffiliate the Libertarian party of New Hampshire was the unfortunate culmination of years of behavior in violation of the Libertarian Party’s platform,” said new LNC Chair Evan McMahon. “These violations reached an impasse, and the previous Libertarian National Committee was unable to reach an armistice with the LPNH. One of my top priorities coming into office was to make it clear that the LNC will adhere to the platform and determine who we will associate with based on those grounds.”

Language from the Motion to Disaffiliate LPNH
The bylaws are clear that affiliate Parties shall not endorse the candidate of another Party. Despite this, the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire openly and publicly endorsed President Trump during the election in 2024.

Furthermore, they have crudely and repeatedly undermined our own candidates and have espoused numerous anti-libertarian positions on a National level.

Be it Resolved that because of these reasons and more, the Libertarian National Committee moves to disaffiliate the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire, mandating that they cease and desist the use of the Party name and logo, until such a time as the LNC recognizes a new affiliate in New Hampshire that shares our Party’s foundational values.