Starting a new thread regarding the signifigance of June 27, 2016.
Too many coincidences all tied together that day, yet journalists still fail to tie them together😏
One of Scott Pelley’s most infamous moments came when he attacked President Trump for defunding Peter Daszak, claiming Trump was standing in the way of a cure for Covid, when in truth Daszak helped create it in the first place. It was a total inversion of reality. Good riddance.
@realJeremyCarl It’s not they’re out of touch. It’s that they know exactly what the voters want and still refuse to do it. It’s much worse than being out of touch.
Tillis voted for a $500,000 per senator fund for senators who were illegally spied on by the Biden. It wasn’t available to any normal Americans whose rights had been violated—just senators. But now Tillis is mad that actual American citizens might receive restitution. What a clown.
Good riddance to corrupt, election-rigging RINO snake Brad Raffensperger in Georgia, who is currently getting absolutely crushed in the GOP gubernatorial primary.
Todd Blanche is absolutely correct. Russiagate wasn’t an exaggerated narrative built on a partial kernel of truth. It was a systematically constructed political and institutional fiction. It was a wholly manufactured framework from beginning to end. Every part of it was invented.
Daszak is the co-conspirator here. His indictment should be next. I didn’t think we’d ever see it, but accountability for the Covid origin cover up has finally arrived. Incredible.
Inspired by fools selfless cause I too have started a non profit to eradicate invasive bush honeysuckle. For each $10 donated I will plant 1 amur honeysuckle bush. Donations over $100 will include a bonus callery pear.
The big question now is what the IRS will do about the SPLC as this case unfolds over the coming years. There is substantial evidence of breaches of 501(c)(3) obligations, including misuse of the public tax subsidies, violations of private inurement and private benefit rules, illegal activities, and material misrepresentations.
Unlike a criminal indictment, the administrative standard is much lower, essentially a balance of probabilities. Based on what is laid out in the indictment alone, the IRS already has enough to take action, from taxing diverted income to freezing bank accounts and placing liens on assets. The question is whether it is willing to act.
David Laufman is in many ways the original cover-up architect of the Russiagate hoax, going back to January 2017. He gave Brookings affiliate Igor Danchenko, the man responsible for much of the fabricated material in the Steele dossier, several weeks to curate his story rather than confronting him directly over his claims (I write about this in my book Swiftboating America, excerpted below). He did this because he could not allow Danchenko to break down and expose the truth that Trump had been set up by the Clinton campaign. Absolutely depraved, but not at all surprising that he had his fingers in the Ukraine scam as well.
This is a very important clip. Democrat lawfare operatives had Andrii Telizhenko’s visa revoked and sanctioned him just as he was about to expose what he knew, as a Ukrainian embassy insider with firsthand knowledge of Democrat–Ukraine collusion in the 2016 and 2020 elections, and as someone who was in the room when Ciaramella helped Joe Biden push for the firing of the prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden.
Thank you to @SenRonJohnson and @jsolomonReports for bringing this to light. @SecScottBessent should undo this injustice and lift the sanctions, which have blocked Andrii from coming to the U.S. and testifying. There may never be accountability, but the facts should at least be allowed to come out.
A little birdie has it that the Atkinson transcript is coming out tomorrow. That should make for a very bad day for lawfare operatives, deep state plotters, fake whistleblowers, and especially Adam Schiff and the Vindman brothers.
Today the FBI filed a motion to quash our discovery requests in the Seth Rich case (i.e., Huddleston v. FBI), and it’s a real cheap shot. The FBI tried to frame it as if we were ignoring previous court orders denying discovery about Seth Rich, but our discovery requests were not targeted at Seth Rich. Instead, they were targeted at the FBI’s overall pattern of hiding documents from FOIA requestors. That distinction is critical, and the FBI knows it.
True enough, discovery is typically not allowed in a FOIA case. We’ve never disputed that. But Huddleston v. FBI is not just a standard FOIA case. In 2024, the presiding judge allowed us to file a supplemental complaint, and that complaint had nothing to do with Seth Rich or any other particular FOIA request. Instead, we asked the court to enjoin the FBI from hiding records from FOIA requestors via various schemes and tricks set forth in the supplemental complaint. I’ll file a response to the FBI’s motion, and hopefully this case will start moving faster.
On another front, the court largely denied our motion to hold the FBI in contempt for violating its orders to produce records from Seth Rich’s laptops. Instead, the court gave the feds 60 days to explain why they did not produce or account for all of the data on the laptops. That was a disappointing result, but the battle is not over.
If you want to know more about what the FBI is trying to hide, you can look at the supplemental complaint, the discovery requests, and the FBI’s motion (links below). I’ve also posted a link to the court’s order denying our motion to hold the FBI in contempt.