JUST RELEASED: L4P and partners submit legal analysis to the ICC establishing that the Israeli War Cabinet is committing the crime of genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza and should be investigated under the Rome Statute of the ICC.
🔗 https://t.co/rIw3QZQJmF
Read the latest piece in the symposium "Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ", entitled "Setting the Record Straight: Germany’s ‘Robust Legal Framework’ on Weapons Export Licences", written by @GonzalezHauck and published by Opinio Juris in collaboration with Law for Palestine.
https://t.co/2ozP3n4u9D
Join us online on Tuesday, 4 November at 8:30 - 10pm Palestine time for a webinar exploring corporate complicity in the energy sector, its role in powering Israel’s ongoing apartheid, occupation and genocide against Indigenous Palestinians, and how we organise against it.
Speakers from Law for Palestine (L4P), Trade Unions for Energy Democracy (TUED), the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO), and Global Energy Embargo for Palestine (GEEP) will take us through the energy-crime nexus, a case study on Vitol's role in supplying energy to Israel, a legal briefing on energy companies' exposure, and practical organising that links anti-occupation campaigning to climate and labour struggles.
With Anisha Patel (L4P), Lala Peñaranda (TUED), Sara Elettra (BNC), Lydia de Leeuw (SOMO), and Ana Sanchez (GEEP).
The webinar includes time for questions from participants. Translation from/to Spanish will be available.
Read @MattHGoldmann’s piece on "Empty Promises: Germany’s Questionable Commitment to International Law", part of the Opinio Juris symposium "Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ", in collaboration with Law for Palestine.
https://t.co/nAsatenMf7
Read @shahdhm's piece, "Insulating Legal Reality? Assessing Germany's Position on the Relevance of Advisory Opinions", featured in the symposium "Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ", published by @opiniojuris in collaboration with Law for Palestine.
https://t.co/CdUwuV1FjV
Continuing our symposium with @opiniojuris, in collaboration with Law for Palestine, on Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the @CIJ_ICJ.
In this piece, Jinan Bastaki and @VictorKattan examine "Competing Jurisdictions? Apartheid Under CERD and Customary International Law".
👉 Read here: https://t.co/phDRQIdsjA
Read this critical piece by Nahed Samour, "From Historical Context to Succeeding Conduct: Germany’s Arms Transfers and the Temporal Scope of ICJ Jurisdiction”, part of the symposium Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ, published by Opinio Juris in collaboration with Law for Palestine.
https://t.co/oJu8o7ZwMC
Read @IhsanAdel1’s piece on Temporality and Third-State Responsibility in Prolonged Occupations, part of the @opiniojuris symposium Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ, in collaboration with @Law4Palestine.
https://t.co/JVbXm6B1Ft
Read @IhsanAdel1’s piece on Temporality and Third-State Responsibility in Prolonged Occupations, part of the @opiniojuris symposium Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ, in collaboration with @Law4Palestine.
https://t.co/JVbXm6B1Ft
Read @AdHaque110's piece on the ICJ, Nicaragua's Monetary Gold Problem (and Its Solution), part of the symposium Jurisdiction, Responsibility, and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ, published by @opiniojuris in collaboration with Law for Palestine.
https://t.co/dttYKSlTSU
Symposium on Jurisdiction, Responsibility and Temporality: Nicaragua v Germany Before the ICJ - Featuring The Monetary Gold Principle and Preliminary Objections in the Nicaragua v Germany Case by @MarcoLongobardo, with @opiniojuris and @Law4Palestine.
https://t.co/cwRwgGlhTI
Introduction to the Symposium on Jurisdiction, Responsibility and Temporality: Nicaragua v. Germany Before the ICJ by Jinan Bastaki, with @opiniojuris and @Law4Palestine
https://t.co/D2Oc8zh0xD
Dr Jinan Bastaki, in conjunction with @Law4Palestine, has brought together some phenomenal legal scholars to reflect on the proceedings in Nicaragua v. Germany at the ICJ.
The first post of the legal symposium is now up on Opinio Juris
https://t.co/bvPFLFVgUc
🔴 Happening now: Our side event at the UN Human Rights Council is examining the responsibilities of states, corporations and other economic actors in relation to Israel’s unlawful occupation, including trade, investment, banking, infrastructure and technology.
🎥 Watch live here: https://t.co/8gS3OJQpyH
📢 Join us at this UN HRC side event examining the responsibilities of states, corporations, financial institutions and other economic actors in relation to Israel's unlawful occupation, including trade, investment, banking, infrastructure, technology and corporate supply chains.
🎥 In person + live online broadcast
🔗 Background and further details: https://t.co/88DeHQ6lz5
The UN has released the latest list of companies supporting and profiting from the Israeli regime’s crimes in occupied Palestine. Among the complicit companies are AirBnB, Booking. Com, Expedia, Motorola, TripAdvisor, and 209 others identified by name. #Boycott#BDS
https://t.co/SZMcuz3K1j
📢 Join us at this UN HRC side event examining the responsibilities of states, corporations, financial institutions and other economic actors in relation to Israel's unlawful occupation, including trade, investment, banking, infrastructure, technology and corporate supply chains.
🎥 In person + live online broadcast
🔗 Background and further details: https://t.co/88DeHQ6lz5
We welcome a significant development in our case before France’s Conseil d’État: France and the UK are joining 10 other countries in banning imports from Israeli settlements in the West Bank, a measure sought by five partners in their ongoing litigation: https://t.co/4FOlYNB15v
1/8 🚨 In an important step towards complying with its obligations under int'l law, #Luxembourg has not renewed its authorisation for Israel Bonds, following the expiry of the prospectus at the beginning of this month. This comes one year after @Law4Palestine published a legal opinion warning that Luxembourg’s approval of Israel Bonds carried a high risk of violating its obligations under international law. 🧵
https://t.co/68FOpAOEzC
8/8 We also urge #Luxembourg, #Ireland and other #European States to take further steps to ensure that their policies and economic relations are fully aligned with their int'l legal obligations -including in relation to trade in goods and services, tourism, banking and investment, pension funds, public procurement, technology and corporate supply chains.
1/8 🚨 In an important step towards complying with its obligations under int'l law, #Luxembourg has not renewed its authorisation for Israel Bonds, following the expiry of the prospectus at the beginning of this month. This comes one year after @Law4Palestine published a legal opinion warning that Luxembourg’s approval of Israel Bonds carried a high risk of violating its obligations under international law. 🧵
https://t.co/68FOpAOEzC
7/8 As Luxembourg has decided not to renew its authorisation for Israeli bonds, responsibility for their approval could now revert to #Ireland, previously designated as the EU “home” State for this purpose. Since 1 September, there has been no approval or renewal of #Israeli Bonds in Ireland or elsewhere in the #EU. However, Ireland has not stated that it will not consider renewal. We therefore remind Ireland of its obligations in this regard.
https://t.co/N9UnXE78uH