A tad late here, but had to take a beat to process. Incredibly thankful for @RHLSTHRM@arjunbhuptani, the team, and everyone who helped make the project what it was.
@EverclearOrg will always hold a special place in my heart. The dream of a better financial system continues!
We've made the difficult decision to wind down @EverclearOrg.
@LayneHaber@RHLSTHRM and I started Connext (later Everclear) in 2017 to help solve the painful UX holding Ethereum back from mainstream adoption.
Over the last 9 years, our team:
- Shipped the first production L2 (using state channels) in 2018.
- Contributed to the creation of the @MolochDAO, catalyzing renewed interest in DAOs.
- Pioneered the first intent-based bridge in 2020.
- Created the Chain Abstraction vision and demonstrated it's potential for staking/restaking protocols.
- Pushed forward ERC-7281 as a neutral, open standard for bridged tokens.
- Brought clearance to DeFi.
- Processed over $6B in network volume.
Throughout that time, we've also done our best to stay true to our principles and the crypto ethos; pushing for a higher bar of transparency and trust-minimization for ourselves and the space at large.
Even though this isn't the ending we ultimately wanted, I am *incredibly* proud of what our team has accomplished and grateful to those who have supported us all of these years ❤️
Longer post-mortem coming soon.
In the meantime, if you are a team that is hiring: we have a team of 10x operators who have executed ruthlessly through some of the harshest market conditions on shoestring budgets. Reach out!
@joddoss AFAIK many of the large ones are elected
Not sure if that’s really a great move because the overlap of the best security people and people who have interest and skill to run a DAO political campaign is …small
@0xAvious Then by definition there shouldn’t be the same tools for these types of situations
That would (likely) resolve to some DAO-initiated process, which is similar to social consensus if the L1 forks. I think many rollups will get there, but I also think many rollups won’t want to
Security councils exist and hold immense power. Yes, they’re a double-edged sword — but that tradeoff is true of every break-glass mechanism in software. If you have one and don’t use it in situations like this, that is just negligent
The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications.
After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users.
As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.
@0xAvious Mm kind of object to a security council being framed as a secret since it’s publicly elected / disclosed.
My point is as long as you have these mechanisms you should use them rather than refuse to because it violates some principle the existence of the council already violates