Learning to train the next generation of patriots to take their country back. With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right...
33 people are shot dead in South Africa every day. This week, the UN handed that country the gavel at its Arms Trade Treaty conference.
South Africa passed some of the strictest gun laws on earth. Citizens surrendered their guns under threat of prison. Then police tasked with destroying those guns sold them to street gangs.
More than 1,000 murders have been traced to those firearms, including hundreds of children.
The state took their guns and armed their killers.
And South Africa isn’t the cautionary tale at this conference. It’s presiding over it.
So I flew to Geneva and said it to their faces.
Full speech below.
Does the government have an inherent right to know about your gun? That's what the "ghost gun" debate is really about. And while I'm at it, it's what the Form 4473 is about as well.
In 1776, the average colonist owned a firearm functionally identical to the standard infantry weapon of the British Army.
Civilian and military parity wasn't a loophole. It was the whole damn point.
.@LindseyGrahamSC helped deliver Joe Biden's 2022 gun-control package, widely regarded as the most significant federal gun-control legislation in decades.
That bill poured hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars into red-flag and gun-confiscation programs, while giving the Biden ATF new tools that were later used to target gun stores, manufacturers, and law-abiding gun owners.
(S.2938 / Roll Call #242, 6/23/22)
Jewish/Israeli groups may openly cheer and boast that their money defeated a congressman, but YOU may not joke about it, because then you are an anti-Semite.
The policemen of thought and speech hated the beginning of Thomas Massie's concession speech.
He began by apologizing for being a little late: he had been trying to reach his opponent to concede the race but it was hard tracking him down in Tel Aviv.
Now if Chinese or Russian interests had poured tens of millions into someone's campaign, the very same people complaining about Massie would consider it a moral imperative to mock that money. Well, what's good for the goose is good for the gander, as they say.
I've seen so many influencers on X claiming that Massie lost because he wasn't a team player, didn't vote for the One Big Beautiful Bill, etc., and that it had nothing at all to do with the tens of millions from a foreign interest. (Then why did those people spend the tens of millions?)
But Marjorie Taylor Greene did vote for the OBBB, and that didn't save her. Meanwhile, Mike Lawler, who is a disaster on Trump's signature issue, immigration, had Trump out campaigning for him!
So no, I don't believe that nonsense because it doesn't fit reality.
John Podhoretz openly boasted that "Jewish money" defeated Massie. "We have to use what means there are at our disposal, and…that is Jewish money!"
Ha'aretz just reported that "pro-Israel spending" indeed "achieved its goal in Kentucky."
AIPAC boasted that it filled Massie and Greene's seats with complaint congressmen.
Video from the "Ed Gallrein" victory party showed about two dozen people there. Yeah, this whole thing sure was an organic and spontaneous expression of the will of the people!
Since it's now obvious to everyone that a foreign country has veto power over who may represent us, I think we losers should at least be allowed to joke about it, as a consolation. Surely our overlords can deign to permit us at least that much.
David Stockman, Ronald Reagan's director of the Office of Management and Budget, was even blunter than ol' Woods:
"In a peaceful, non-interventionist Republic, foreign countries would not spend tens of millions in one-off Congressional races because there would be no policy favors, fiscal lucre and military aids to lobby for. And AIPAC would not even exist, let alone be bragging about replacing the two greatest advocates of peace and liberty in the US Congress with two paid lackeys with their noses up the place in Bibi's anatomy where the sun don't shine. Bring the Empire Home. All of it."
Ed Gallrein refused to complete the National Association for Gun Rights candidate survey distributed to congressional candidates on behalf of pro-gun voters.
The survey asked straightforward questions on major Second Amendment issues, including expanded background checks, federal “gun-free school zones,” and national Constitutional Carry legislation.
Gallrein has had every opportunity to reassure gun owners by simply going on the record. Instead, he has refused to answer.
Gun owners have seen the pattern before: staged campaign photos with firearms, vague “support the Second Amendment” slogans, and carefully scripted talking points that disappear the moment pressure comes from Washington insiders.
I can’t believe Massie lied to Congress, tortured puppies, ran brutal experiments on orphans, tricked Trump, poisoned millions, protected Pharma from liability, made up policies that shut down the globe, and lobbied the President for a pardon.
Oh, whoops.
That was Fauci.
And Con Inc could care less because Trump allowed it.
Maybe you don't like this Massie vote or that Massie vote, but what you should really not like is three socially leftist billionaires, motivated by a foreign interest, buying a congressional seat.
David Stockman, Ronald Reagan's budget director, says "Tom Massie is one of the greatest patriots and sentinels of Liberty and free market prosperity to ever serve in the US Congress."
This nonentity "Ed Gallrein" the billionaires have running against him is so embarrassing Massie's opponents don't even talk about him.
Except with Dan Bongino, he won't do long-form interviews. He won't debate. He uses AI to write his social media posts (this was proven -- he twice forgot to take out the part where Grok says, "Here is your social media post, crafted in your style"). He won't even return the candidate questionnaires to the local gun and pro-life groups.
Would someone who's so hesitant to share his views -- he was even backing out of public events when he found out there would be press questions -- have stood up against Anthony Fauci? Be serious!
If he wins, that means he gets rewarded for refusing to debate, and for using an unprecedented influx of outside cash to run a Biden-in-the-basement campaign.
Should a candidate be rewarded for that?
Would someone who -- as Gallrein did -- ditched the GOP when Trump was elected have defended the president through two impeachments, as Massie did, or grilled Merrick Garland about FBI assets on January 6th?
We normal people prefer the guy who was against the lockdowns and the masks and the vax mandates, who worked to get the "kill switch" out of new cars before you even knew that was a thing, who sure as hell doesn't hesitate to send in a Second Amendment questionnaire, and whose arm can't be twisted.
Tell your grandmother the truth about Massie and then drive her to the polling place.
Massie is not just the best congressman we have -- he is one of the best congressmen of all time, by far.
Pass the simplest IQ test of all time and support Massie
It’s sad that a week before this election people are making false and unsubstantiated allegations about me in an obvious attempt to influence the outcome of this election.
All of the claims of inappropriate conduct are false. I’ve never offered anyone money in exchange for their silence. I report all of my farm income, including cash, to the IRS.
There are no ethics claims filed against me, nor have there ever been any claims filed against me in my 14 years in office. I have consulted legal counsel and we are considering all options.
As a family law attorney who has represented numerous victims of domestic violence, I have been deeply troubled by the circulating “sworn statement” from Cynthia West alleging emotional abuse by Congressman Thomas Massie.
After listening to the statement twice, I was struck by the complete absence of any specific, verifiable allegations. There were no claims of physical abuse, no harassing communications, no documented threats, and no evidence of any kind—only vague assertions without supporting facts.
Out of professional duty, I examined the available record. Ms. West has a documented history of making false abuse allegations. Notably, during the very period she claims to have been involved with Congressman Massie, she filed sworn accusations of emotional and physical abuse against the father of her children. On October 1, 2024, she swore under oath in an affidavit to these claims. However, after the court reviewed all the evidence, the allegations were dismissed in full.
I have sat with real victims—both men and women—who have endured genuine domestic violence and harassment. I have fought alongside them for protection and justice. It is precisely because of that experience that I find it so damaging when someone makes false accusations. It undermines the credibility of legitimate victims and erodes public trust in the system.
Congressman Massie has earned my trust over many years—to the point that I would entrust him with my own children. These latest allegations appear to be nothing more than a desperate attempt to interfere in an election against a principled public servant who has consistently worked to protect women and families from real abuse and exploitation.
False claims like these do real harm—not just to the accused, but to every legitimate victim seeking justice.