🇪🇸🔴 JUST IN: A local Spanish mother in Ceuta demolishes a left-wing TV host sitting comfortably in Madrid during a debate about immigration.
The host tries to claim it is "dangerous" to say all the migrants should leave Spain.
The mother explodes: "If they came by violating a border, they must return in the same way. Because our children are not to blame. My children were locked up in my house... My children are 14 and 12 years old. Is it right that they can't go to the beach?"
The mother then appears to leave the host stunned, at least for a moment: "Bring your kids here! Bring them if you have the guts! Sitting in Madrid all dressed up, it's very easy."
"Who protects my children's rights? Their mother here, standing firm, not sitting in a studio like you!"
She delivers a final warning: "We in Ceuta are tough nuts to crack! And we're going to be here, fighting hard and making noise until the last day!"
This mother eloquently and passionately expresses the frustrations of thousands of Ceuta locals as a crowd cheers her on in the background.
Follow: @RMXnews
🚨 BREAKING: Nick Shirley just went FULL THROTTLE at the EPIC Islamic Center in Texas.
He showed up to film. Peacefully.
They didn’t debate him.
They didn’t welcome questions.
They hunted him down on their property and told him to get out.
A Muslim man follows him, pointing, demanding:
“Are you a Muslim?! This is NOT for you.”
Not “this is private property.”
Not “please stay on the sidewalk.”
Straight up: You’re not one of us. Leave.
Nick didn’t flinch. Camera rolling the entire time.
This isn’t a misunderstanding.
This is the mask slipping.
They built it. They control it.
And they just told America, on camera, that parts of Texas are off-limits unless you convert.
Cohabitation?
They just said the quiet part out loud.
Watch every second. This one is going to travel.
Elon Musk was asked how he handles employees who disagree with him publicly.
His answer contradicts every leadership book written in the last 30 years.
"I'd rather have someone who argues with me and is right than someone who agrees with me and is wrong."
The room expected the diplomatic answer. That he values diverse perspectives. That healthy debate makes the team stronger. The standard CEO answer about psychological safety.
He went further. He said the most dangerous person in any company is the one who agrees with you to protect their job. Because that person will let you drive the company off a cliff rather than risk being fired for telling you the cliff is there. The yes-man isn't loyal. He's selfish. He's trading the company's survival for his own comfort.
He said SpaceX has a rule. If an engineer sees a problem and doesn't speak up, and the problem later causes a failure, the silence is treated as more serious than the mistake itself. The person who made the error was trying. The person who watched the error and said nothing was protecting themselves at the cost of the mission.
Think about what that inverts. In most companies, the person who stays quiet and avoids conflict is rewarded with job security. At SpaceX, silence is the fireable offense and disagreement is the job requirement.
Most leaders say they want honesty. Then they punish the first person who delivers it. He built a system where dishonesty through silence is the thing that gets punished. The culture didn't happen by accident. It was engineered to make agreement more dangerous than disagreement.
Royce White takes his WNBA Draft campaign straight to an Indiana Fever game, showing up courtside in a long blonde wig and getting plenty of attention from fans.
The former NBA first-round pick says he's there to support the league and "scout some of the competition" as he pushes his bid to enter the 2027 WNBA Draft.
White says his declaration is meant to force the WNBA to clarify whether biological males can compete in the league. His legal team has threatened discrimination litigation if he's blocked from competing.
Former NBA player Enes Kanter Freedom says he can play in the WNBA under its own rules
Laura Ingraham: “Are you a trans woman?”
Enes Kanter Freedom: “Article 13, Section 1 says if you identify as a woman, then you’re allowed to play.”
Laura Ingraham: “So you’re identifying as a woman tonight?”
Enes Kanter Freedom: “I identify as a woman. Sure, yes. So I can play.”
Laura Ingraham: “But they’re never going to let you play.”
Enes Kanter Freedom: “Why not? I mean, that’s the rule that they put. I’m just following their rules.”
Enes Kanter Freedom: “If they ever come out and say, ‘Okay, we are changing the rules,’ I respect their decision. I will, you know, follow the rules.”
Enes Kanter Freedom: “But right now, if you identify as a woman, you’re allowed to play. And I am identifying as a woman, and I am actually allowed to play. That’s it.”
When this little girl was ten, her father sold her and her niece, also ten, to a 60 year old man for $200. They were sold into muta’a, or “pleasure marriage,” a Shia Muslim concept in which a couple is temporarily “married” so that sexual activity can take place. In this case, the man in question was able to beat and rape two little girls without the expense of taking them into his household afterwards.
After the rapes, this girl and her niece ran away from their abuser. Unable to return home, lest they be sold and raped again, they now live under a bridge in Beirut.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is Islam.
Floodwaters rushed down from Tibet, killing over many people and leaving thousands missing, yet the Chinese state media calls it the "Nepal flood."
Just days before the disaster, someone had already filmed the border hydropower construction sites: nonstop blasting, rock crushers roaring away, tunnels forcibly carved into cliffs, with virtually no safety measures and environmental protection nowhere in sight.
Projects like Rasuwagadhi and Upper Trishuli 3A that were washed away—all backed by Chinese capital or Chinese companies.
The State government official line is that it was a glacier collapse blocking the river and then bursting. They lie without even drafting a script! The entire river valley has been turned into a construction zone—blasting, digging, and diverting the riverbed—amplifying the risks.
Tibet has planned over a hundred hydropower dams, and the Jilong border crossing is being bulldozed right into glacier and seismic zones. Power sent east, water discharged south.
Now a landslide dam has formed upstream, liable to burst again at any moment, and downstream Nepal and Bihar in India will be definitely be affected.
Chinese obsession with infrastructure will be their own undoing.
The saddest photo from the Islamic Republic.
Iran, 2000’s.
Two girls screaming in terror inside a morality police Patrol van.
Their “crime”? A bright hijab.
Or a few strands of hair showing.
One of them is gripping the door in panic.
This is what they did to our sisters for existing.
Feminists don’t talk abt us because we don’t hate Israel !
I’ve lived this nightmare. Living in Iran for over 30 years automatically made me a target for the morality police simply for being a woman. I still remember that constant daily stress — every minute expecting to be arrested.
Be our voice. Share our story.
Durante mi militancia en el marxismo asistí a muchísimas charlas. Y con el tiempo empecé a notar un patrón muy interesante:
Podíamos pasar diez horas hablando de cómo tomar el poder.
Diez horas hablando de revolución, de estrategia, de organización, de activismo, de cómo derrotar al enemigo de clase, de cómo transformar las relaciones de poder.
Pero había una pregunta que nunca aparecía:
¿Y después qué?
Es decir:
¿Cómo vamos a crear riqueza?
¿Cómo vamos a organizar los incentivos?
¿Cómo vamos a asignar recursos escasos?
Silencio.
Y fue ahí cuando lo entendí.
El marxismo tiene una obsesión patológica con conquistar el poder y una pobreza extraordinaria de respuestas sobre cómo utilizarlo para construir una sociedad funcional.
La revolución está perfectamente descrita.
La sociedad posterior, en absoluta oscuridad.
Porque decir que algún día llegará una sociedad sin explotación, sin clases y sin contradicciones es muy fácil.
Lo difícil es explicar cómo llegas hasta ahí sin destruir en el camino los mecanismos que permiten a una sociedad producir y prosperar.
Y cuanto más preguntaba, más evidente se volvía.
El marxista podía explicarte durante horas quién tenía la culpa.
Pero cuando preguntabas cómo funcionaría concretamente esa nueva sociedad, las respuestas se hacían más oscuras.
Y quizá por eso, cuando intentaba ahondar en estos temas, la conversación siempre volvía al mismo lugar: cómo tomar el poder. No pasaban de eso.
Por eso hoy, cuando escucho a alguien hablar durante horas sobre la explotación, destruir el sistema y construir una sociedad nueva, mi primera pregunta es:
¿Cómo vas a hacerla funcionar?
Nunca verás a un marxista responderte esto porque literalmente no puede, no sabe.
Entonces deduce que, al igual que como con cualquier otra estafa piramidal, cuando hagas preguntas directas y concretas al marxismo, este intentará evitar en todo momento darte respuestas claras.
Nunca lo olvides.