@elliotsteinmetz If Brunson tries to dribble out of that, he is fucked and won’t he get. Launching that shot was absolutely the right play, and it worked out. But in terms of probabilities, I think the defensive strategy was also correct—forced a long three.
@elliotsteinmetz 100 %. If he passes out of the double team, they were fucked. OG is open, but if Brunson lobs it to him, he gets it with 3 seconds, stepping away from the hoop, and castle rotates up and is in his face. Tough scoring situation. If OG passes to an open KAT, time is running out
@BetsTym@Rust_And_Decay@EvanAKilgore I provided a simple version for purposes of illustration. There might have been some Harris/lake, but I think far more Trump / Gallego. I don’t know the exact breakdown, but the point is that you don’t need fraud to explain the outcome, just split ticket voting
@Rust_And_Decay@EvanAKilgore Thus, Lake has more votes (94) than Kamala (90). No conspiracy, just a small number of people who vote for Gallego and Trump
@Rust_And_Decay@EvanAKilgore I can make it make sense. There are Trump/Gallego voters.
Simple version: imagine all of Arizona as 100 trump voters and 90 Harris voters.
Then assume all 90 harris voters vote Gallego. But then assume 6 trump voters also vote Gallego.
Then Gallego has 96 and Lake has 94.
@BBGreatMoments Good thing that worked, cause if it hadn’t, Lou Brown would have gotten torched on the call-in shows for bunting with two outs, a runner on second, and a man with utterly dead knees at the plate
@mattyglesias Discuss it every year in my American cultural history class alongside some Public Enemy and watching Do the Right Thing. Lots of great stuff for students to dig into