Lefty Bollocks

This is my bio. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@brianschatz @sarahjeong Sarah Jeong hates you...

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@Dasani_01 @MatBabiak @crooksandliars @Karoli @PressSec You Leftists are just deranged...here's Acosta on CNN saying he never touched her.

He literally says "I didn't touch her"

He did. He's lying. You're lying. Stop covering for him.

https://t.co/Iv4YgzP7GR

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@hollis517 @AP Perhaps when you're done spitting on America and Americans, you can direct just a little bit of your anger at the 3rd world cesspools run by dictators and despots these people are fleeing from...is that even remotely possible?

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@JacquesCalonne

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 And just to be clear, I don't have to justify my violence, you have to justify yours. You're the one proposing new laws (force) to get your way.

Your side has to convince the other side to accept your laws (the threat of force). If they refuse, what are you gonna do about it?

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 And again, this is not a new concept. This is how our own country was founded. The American colonists were subjected to unfair law after unfair law and finally said enough. Talking was no longer an option. War was the only remedy.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 An attempt to repeal the 2A will mean civil war. That is a fact. If people try to repeal the 2A, they're saying people do not have the right to self-defense. Then there can no longer be a discussion. So violence must settle it.

Same applies to the 1A and free speech.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 I say, "We already have laws that restrict those rights and we've accepted them and abide by them. But beyond a point, people will no longer abide by them."

You respond, "Ah, so you don't agree with any laws"

How old are you, 12? Do you have trouble understanding words?

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 I'm not the one suggesting the remedy is violence.

You are.

I'm telling you the response to that violence will be violence.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 So to bring it back around to your original question...

If you're proposing to use VIOLENCE to trample on people's rights beyond a certain point, then yes, it will be met with VIOLENCE.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 If you think you can convince 200M+ Americans to repeal the 2A, go for it.

I doubt you can though. In fact, I know you can't. And you know you can't. You just want to argue, because you're mad that you know you can't.

It's actually getting boring...

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 I promise you, my side won't lose the argument.

As I said, you need 38 states, you won't even get 1.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 I've stated multiple times that we have a process to amend the Constitution. You should really get to it instead of wasting time on Twitter...the process is long and difficult.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 You ask, "What if the people change their minds?"

The burden is on your side to convince them to change their minds. In fact, you have to convince people in 38 States to change their minds. You won't even convince 1.

But, if you want to waste your life trying, go for it.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 My 'side' won the argument 242 years ago.

However, if you think you have a better way, you're free to argue for it. It's incumbent on you to convince people that the current state of things is wrong.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 But, who knows...maybe Jefferson, Adams, Franklin and Washington were all wrong.

Perhaps one day, society will tear down their monuments and erect statues in your honor...though I tend to doubt it.

[Lefty Bollocks @LeftyBollocks]

@j_razor101 Thomas Jefferson stated my view pretty well in the Declaration of Independence. Though he said it more eloquently than I ever could.