Lenapard

Autorin

[Lenapard @Lena_Pard]

@spect3ral MAP

[Lenapard @Lena_Pard]

@TommiPedruzzi Info

[Lenapard @Lena_Pard]

@TommiPedruzzi Skill

[Mike Futia @mikefutia]

I just built a Claude Code SEO agent that replaces your $200/mo. Ahrefs subscription 🤯

One prompt → keyword gaps found, competitors analyzed, content written in your brand voice, rankings tracked weekly.

All inside Claude Code.

Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who know SEO matters but never have the bandwidth to actually do it consistently.

This agent runs the entire loop for you:

→ Connects to Google Search Console and pulls your real ranking data
→ Finds your "gap zone" — keywords sitting at positions 5–20
→ Scrapes who's outranking you and breaks down exactly why they're winning
→ Interviews you once about your brand, customers, and positioning
→ Writes content in your voice — not generic AI slop that tanks after 90 days
→ Tracks rankings weekly and feeds results back into the next cycle

No expensive tools you barely open.
No freelancers writing content that sounds like everyone else.
No manually checking rankings and forgetting to act on it.

What you get:

- Keyword cards with a specific action for each gap zone opportunity
- A competitive breakdown showing who's beating you and the exact fix
- A weekly content plan generated from your real GSC data
- A brand voice profile Claude uses for every article it writes

Built 100% in Claude Code with Google Search Console.

I put together a full playbook with the skill files, brand interview, and the exact weekly workflow.

Want it for free?

> Like this post
> Comment "SEO"

And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

[Ole Lehmann @itsolelehmann]

i deleted half my Claude setup last week and every output got BETTER

sounds backwards, but anthropic's own team just explained exactly why it works.

here's the one prompt that tells you what to cut (and you don't even have to paste anything):

this is what happens to everyone...

you get a bad output, so you add a rule to your skills. "be more concise."

next week, another bad output. another rule. "use a casual tone."

but a month later, something else breaks. "always explain technical terms."

you keep stacking, and it feels productive because you're fixing problems as they come up.

but 3 months in, you've got 30 rules piled on top of each other.

some of them contradict each other ("be concise" and "always explain your reasoning" are fighting).

some of them fix problems that the model doesn't even have anymore.

and the model is trying to follow all of them at once, which means it's doing none of them well.

it's like handing a chef a 47-step recipe when they only need 12.

the extra 35 steps slow the chef down, make them second-guess the parts they already know, and the dish comes out worse than if you'd just let them cook.

that's what over-prompting does.

anthropic just published a piece on how they build claude code (the ai coding agent).

their own engineering team found that their scaffolding was making the ai worse

which means your custom instructions are almost certainly doing the same thing.

so here's the actionable move...

instead of manually reading through your setup line by line, just tell claude to audit itself.

if you're in claude's desktop app, claude already has access to your:

claude[.]md (the file where your preferences and rules live), your skills folder (where your reusable instruction files are stored), your context files, everything.

just open claude code/cowork and say this:

—

"read my entire setup before responding. check my claude .md, every skill in my skills folder, every file in my context folder, and any other instruction files you can find.

then go through every rule, instruction, and preference you found. for each one, tell me:

1. is this something you already do by default without being told?
2. does this contradict or conflict with another rule somewhere else in my setup?
3. does this repeat something that's already covered by a different rule or file?
4. does this read like it was added to fix one specific bad output rather than improve outputs overall?
5. is this so vague that you'd interpret it differently every time? (ex: 'be more natural' or 'use a good tone')

then give me a list of everything you'd cut with a one-line reason for each, a list of any conflicts you found between files, and a cleaned up version of my claude.md with the dead weight removed."

—

one message. claude goes and reads your entire setup, audits it, and comes back with exactly what to cut and why.

you don't dig through files, you don't read every rule yourself. it does the whole thing.

once you get the results, don't just blindly delete everything it flags.

here's the process:

1. read what it flagged and why
2. delete the flagged rules
3. run your 3 most common tasks with the trimmed setup
4. did the output stay the same or get better? the deleted rules were dead weight
5. did something specific break? add back just that one rule

the goal is to find the minimum viable setup that gets you the output you want.

your ai setup should be getting simpler over time.

addition by subtraction baby

[Lenapard @Lena_Pard]

@mikefutia NANO

[Mike Futia @mikefutia]

Claude Code + Nano Banana 2 is f*cking cracked 🤯

I built a system inside Claude Code that researches any brand, writes 40 ad prompts from scratch, and fires them all to Nano Banana 2.

One brand name + one URL = 40 production-ready static ads.

All inside Claude Code.

I took @alexgoughcooper's brilliant framework and automated the whole thing inside Claude Code.

Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who need high-volume ad creative without briefing a designer or spending hours in Canva.

If you're finding winning ad concepts on Meta and manually recreating them one at a time in Higgsfield — copying prompts, pasting product details, tweaking aspect ratios, downloading, organizing...

This system eliminates the entire loop:

→ Give Claude a brand name and URL
→ It researches the brand's fonts, colors, packaging, and photography style
→ Builds a Brand DNA document from scratch
→ Fills in Alex's 40 proven ad templates (headline, us vs them, testimonial, UGC, review cards, stat callouts) with brand-specific details
→ Fires every prompt to Nano Banana 2 with your product photos as reference
→ Downloads finished ads into organized folders with an HTML gallery

No Higgsfield.
No manual prompt filling.
No copy-pasting between tools.

What you get:

→ 40 ad formats filled with your exact brand colors, fonts, and copy
→ 4 variations per format so you pick the best output
→ Product photos passed as reference so the model matches your real packaging
→ A reusable system — new brand, new folder, same pipeline

Built 100% in Claude Code with Nano Banana 2.

I put together a full playbook & Loom video showing the exact process to set this up yourself.

Want access for free?

> Like this post
> Comment "NANO"

And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

[Lenapard @Lena_Pard]

@free_ai_guides Alex 🔥

[Shaun Eng @shauneng]

I've never thought I'd do this...but here we go

I thought if I shared this, I'd be giving away everything I know

But it doesn't matter

I figured out how to consistently make brands $1M/mth with Facebook Ads

I decided to film a video on the exact blueprint we use to do it

This won't get crazy engagement

But for those that find this gem, it'll supercharge your business

Bookmark this:

[Shaun Eng @shauneng]

Most of you think you need to be creative to make winning FB ads

Bullshit.

I'm not creative at all. Still created ads that made over $1M each.

You don't need "creative juices"
What you need is more research.

If you can't figure out what ads your audience wants, you haven't done enough research.

Spend 30 minutes scrolling your niche on TikTok/IG/FB. You'll see dozens of trending formats and hooks your avatar is already consuming.

If you don't know what to say when scriptwriting, you don't understand how they think enough. You don't know their daily struggles or ideal outcomes.

Which is again solved through doing manual research.

Read comments on competitor posts. Go down Reddit rabbitholes. Study how trending content phrases things.

See how they describe their problems. Use their exact words.

Even to post on X, I don't just wake up and have ideas on what to post. They're based on struggles I've lived and research + conversations into what struggles Ecom brands have.

"But I'll just use AI for ideas"

Most of you don't know how to prompt or inject context. And since you skip manual research, you can't tell a good idea from a bad one.

You'll get slop. And your audience can tell it's AI.

As tempting as all these new tools and Ai sound

Your basics and fundamentals are still going to be the most important things that help you scale

Super unsexy. But it's how we've scaled YoY while others chase shiny objects.

Your winning ads are hidden in random 2AM Reddit thread rabbitholes broski, not in your imagination.

[Shaun Eng @shauneng]

"I'm afraid I'll screw up Q4 for my new brand"
"I don't have a product ready for Q4 I'm screwed"

This is most of my DMs rn

Real talk: Your first Q4 won't be special

I was a noob for the first 2 years in Ecom until I hit my first 100k day

But it taught me more than any "success" would have

Here's the mindset you need to compound skills and build a huge Ecom brand:

[Niche Site Lady @NicheSiteLady]

I just found a Facebook page that's 2 weeks old and already has 20,000 fans...

So of course, I took a look at its Ad Library...

[Jon Elder @BlackLabelAdvsr]

r/FulfillmentByAmazon

A large community for Amazon sellers to discuss FBA, product sourcing, and TOS changes. Massive value here.

[Niche Site Lady @NicheSiteLady]

I've been running Facebook ads for 10+ years.

Here are 9 things I see people doing wrong.

Fix these and I promise your results will 🚀

[Charles Floate 📈 @Charles_SEO]

The white hat SEO side seem to associate all black hat SEO = Spam.

Maybe this was the case 20 years ago, but most modern black hat =
- Buying links (all agencies do this, and your conferences are powered by agencies selling them)
- Domaining (Anyone in SEO should be doing this too)
- Parasite (Taking multiple SERP spots is just future proofing yourself vs SGE)
- International (Algos are weaker in other languages and Geos, you can rank with English paid links and make insane ROI)
- Cloaking (Not used all that much, and mostly by malware spreaders that Google has helped more than hurt this past year)
- AI Content (Not banned but bulk generated content is essentially banned and it's impossible to 100% detect and will only get better...)

I don't actually remember the last true churn and burn project we did, because it's almost pointless ranking an asset for such a short period of time these days when you can be much safer about it and profit for far longer.

There are a lot of other techniques too, but these are the most common ones used today.

[Modest Mitkus @ModestMitkus]

Stop selling your time - sell digital products instead.

I collected 80 digital product ideas to get you started.

Like and reply 👋 to receive it. [must be following to DM]

[Niche Site Lady @NicheSiteLady]

I make $10k/month by posting my blog posts to my Facebook page. 🤑

Here are the exact posts that you should be writing if you want to make a lot of money...

(These work for ANY niche) 👇

[Niche Site Lady @NicheSiteLady]

WOOHOO! My new Facebook page just got invited to the Bonus program! 🎉

- Started less than a month ago
- 3,500 followers
- $280 spent on ads to grow the page

I'm so excited to share how much it earns as it grows.

This is my public case study so you can all watch too! 😀

[Justin Welsh @thejustinwelsh]

Imagine that by spending 45 minutes per day on the internet sharing knowledge and interacting with other smart people, you can build a network that will provide you leverage for the next 20-30 years of your life.

[Bilal Javed @ThebilalSEO]

Pinterest + Canva + ChatGPT = $8378/m

(Even my grandpa can do it)

Here's a simple process to follow ↓

- Find a high-volume niche with a good RPM.
- Create content using ChatGPT
- Create high-quality designs using Canva.
- Pin consistently (7-12 daily) for 3-4 months.

Boom! You'll see results.