Lena Potts

[Saggezza Eterna @FinalTelegraph]

Ilhan Omar: The Fraudulent, Anti-American Parasite Who Must Be Stripped of Citizenship and Expelled

Expel Ilhan Omar: Here's How (THREAD 🧵)

Ilhan Omar stands before the American public as a glaring monument of progressive arrogance and institutional decay.

Our nation opened its borders, welcomed her family from a Kenyan refugee camp, and handed her the sacred privileges of American liberty. In exchange for this unearned benevolence, she spent decades spitting upon the foundation that sheltered her, laundering foreign grievances into legislative power, and sneering at the very citizens whose taxes funded her ascent. Leftist elites hail her as a triumphant pioneer, demanding reverent submission to her sanctimonious lectures. The reality is far uglier: she represents a self-serving operator who traded civic gratitude for relentless hostility...

[C3 @C_3C_3]

Follow along…

You work.

You are taxed.

Dems create fraudulent NGOs.

Government sends your money overseas to fraudulent NGO with USAID.

Fraudulent NGO sends it back to Dems through ActBlue.

Dems use your money to get elected and destroy America.

All of DC knew.

Simple.

[Saggezza Eterna @FinalTelegraph]

DISCLAIMER: The following is theoretical: (THREAD 🧵)

There are only about 100 individuals that, if arrested, could theoretically allow President Trump to "win" every State as well as the House and The Senate.

If the sole and only goal is winning the midterms, and we are operating under a Machiavellian framework where "due process" is an obstacle to be bypassed for the sake of political survival and dominance, then the target list is not about "justice" in the legal sense. It is about neutralizing the enemy's infrastructure, silencing their loudest voices, and terrifying their donor class into submission.

To win, you do not arrest petty criminals. You arrest the architects of the opposition. You arrest the people who fund the attacks, the people who censor the truth, and the people who weaponize the state against conservative bases.

Here is the strategic list of about 100 individuals whose immediate, no-questions-asked arrest would cripple the leftist machine and guarantee a Republican wave.

This is not about law and order; it is about war.

(NOTE: You could probably add Bernie Sanders to this list but there is a strategy where you leave some of the useless fools and losers around to make it appear that you are merciful and so the enemy thinks they have hope. So, since Bernie is such an incompetent fool I have left him out.)

Let's begin:

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@BrianOSheaSPI @naomirwolf

[TheDebriefing17 @TheDebriefing17]

🤔For about 60 years, the global financial system ran on a simple trick: move dollars outside the United States where nobody was watching.

Banks figured this out in the 1950s. If you lend dollars in London instead of New York, no American regulator sees the transaction. No filing. No suspicious activity report. No questions about where the money came from or who it belongs to.

That system the offshore dollar market became the backbone of global finance. Trillions of dollars moving through it every year. Perfectly legal for most users. And completely invisible to law enforcement.

The same pipes that moved legitimate money also moved everything else. Drug money. Bribe money. Weapons money. Sanctions evasion. Tax evasion. Human trafficking proceeds. If you needed to move dirty money, you used the same system everyone else used. You just didn't fill out the paperwork. Nobody was checking.

That's over.

Not next year. Not in theory. Right now.

Here's what's actually happening:

The U.S. government is replacing the old pipes with new ones.

The old system: move dollars offshore, no tracking, no screening, no transparency.

The new system: every dollar transaction runs through licensed institutions that screen against sanctions lists, report suspicious activity, and back every digital dollar with a Treasury bond you can verify.

Twenty-one of the biggest banks in the world Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, UBS, and more just volunteered to build the new system. They didn't do this because they believe in transparency. They did it because they've watched what happens to banks that don't get on board. Five major banks collapsed within weeks of each other in 2023. The biggest Swiss bank in history was absorbed. A $4.3 billion fine was paid by the world's largest crypto exchange.

The banks that cooperate survive. The banks that don't get shut down. That pattern has been running for three years and it hasn't missed once.

At the same time, the government is hunting down every corridor that dirty money uses to move.

Iran is the clearest example. In twelve days, Treasury hit a bank in the UAE, an Egyptian bank's branches, a Hong Kong front company, and a Turkish bank. Four countries. Four corridors. One per week. Each one was a pipe that Iran used to move oil money. Each one got severed from the dollar.

The Treasury Secretary said publicly: "Financial institutions continue to find out the hard way." He called the latest designation "code for you are out of business."

This isn't happening only to Iran. The same pattern is running everywhere at once.

In China, over a thousand senior officials have been investigated and more than a hundred military officers purged. The entire military command was reduced to one man. The government is cleaning out people with hidden financial exposure people who have money in systems they're not supposed to be in.

In Russia, a new law lets the government freeze your bank accounts, block your property, and revoke your passport based on a charge alone no trial needed. Several hundred thousand people are affected. The government seized $23 billion in assets in the first half of 2026.

In Saudi Arabia, 59,000 people were processed in a single week. Arrested, deported, referred to embassies, or placed in enforcement proceedings. Penalties for helping someone stay illegally: up to 15 years in prison.

In the United States, the FBI seized $8 billion in crypto in one operation. The DEA arrested 617 people in a single Sinaloa cartel sweep. Treasury issued the largest broker-dealer fine in history $125 million against UBS and told them to go back and review four specific areas: the southwest border, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela.

Five countries that don't agree on almost anything are all doing the same thing at the same time.

The U.S. and China are in a trade war. The U.S. and Russia are on opposite sides of a shooting war. Saudi Arabia and Iran are regional rivals. None of these countries are coordinating in the way allies coordinate. But none of them are interfering with each other's enforcement operations.

China isn't protecting its corrupt officials from investigation. Russia isn't shielding its oligarchs from seizure. Saudi Arabia isn't slowing down to wait for anyone. And the U.S. is hitting financial corridors in allied countries Turkey is a NATO member without hesitation.

They're all hunting the same thing: money that moves in the dark.

The Federal Reserve the most powerful financial institution in America just got a smaller job.

The new Fed Chair went to the most important central banking speech of the year and described an institution with one tool: the short-term interest rate. That's it. He killed forward guidance. He said the Fed's emergency programs should be "used sparingly, if at all." He blamed his predecessors for 65 months of high inflation.

Everything he didn't mention now belongs to Treasury. Bank chartering. Stablecoin licensing. Sanctions enforcement. Anti-money-laundering rules. Digital dollar infrastructure. International financial architecture. Yield curve management through buybacks.

The Treasury Secretary spoke first at the G20. The Fed Chair spoke second and called himself a supporting player. The CEO of JPMorgan was invited to attend the first time a private-sector executive has been given a seat at a G20 finance meeting. Treasury invited him. Not the Fed.

Countries that cooperate get relief. Countries that don't get squeezed.

Syria was on the state sponsors of terrorism list for 47 years. It was removed the same week Iran got the largest sanctions package in history. One door opened. One door closed.

Belarus got 80% sanctions relief and 900 prisoners released. Russia got $23 billion seized and a law that financially erases its exiles.

Venezuela's president was captured. A new government was installed. The U.S. signed a 65-billion-barrel oil deal the largest since the original Aramco concession. The operators who were under sanctions got displaced from the oil fields. The country that enrolled in the new system got investment.

Cuba got three generations of the Castro family sanctioned, their petroleum supply chain designated end to end, and their external bank cut off. The same OFAC page that designated the Castro grandson quietly removed a Swiss-Russian financial entity from the sanctions list. Tighter on one. Looser on the other. Same page. Same day.

The pattern: cooperate and you get a path in. Refuse and the corridor you're using gets severed. There's no third option.

What this means for regular people.

The financial system you use every day is being rebuilt. The banks you trust your money with are being sorted into two groups the ones that comply with the new transparency rules and the ones that don't. So far, every bank that didn't comply has been fined, absorbed, or shut down.

The digital dollar is coming, but it won't be run by the government. Private companies will issue it under Treasury oversight, backed by government bonds. The Federal Reserve is legally prohibited from creating its own version.

The import system has been closed to untraceable goods. The $800 duty-free loophole is gone. Every shipment needs documentation. Forced-labor goods are stopped at the border.

Crypto is being sorted the same way. Licensed, transparent platforms survive. Unlicensed ones get seized, fined, or designated. $8 billion seized in one FBI operation. $514 million frozen by Tether in 30 days. A 23-year-old botnet killed live on stage.

None of this is secret. Every action described here was published in the Federal Register, announced in a Treasury press release, or stated publicly by a cabinet secretary. The information is free. It's just scattered across hundreds of documents that most people never read.

That's all this is. Reading the documents. Putting them in order. And watching the pattern.

I am the guy on the couch, and you have been debriefed.

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

Yes this is all true. I worked for a major computer company for 30 years. In the 70’s it was fantastic. We were all so proud to work there. Then mid 80’s through the 90’s it all started to go downhill. Our jobs were outsourced to China, India, etc. We were required to train our foreign replacements. The company forced out people who were very good at their jobs and replaced them with people who had no training, no education and no motivation and most could hardly speak English. I remember speaking to several of them on the phone. They would ask the same questions day after day. I hung up on them and then retired. I couldn’t wait to get out of there.

[AJ Inapi (Allan) @aj_inapi]

Older Americans, you already lived through this.

You were told globalization would make goods CHEAPER.

And it did.

But nobody told you the full price.

In 1979, America had roughly 19.6 MILLION manufacturing jobs.

Then the model changed.

During the 1980s and 1990s, American companies increasingly moved production overseas because labor and manufacturing costs were lower.

Consumers benefited.

TVs got cheaper.

Clothes got cheaper.

Electronics got cheaper.

Household goods got cheaper.

But then something else happened.

The factories in American towns started closing.

Steel.

Textiles.

Furniture.

Machinery.

Electronics.

Auto parts.

Jobs that once allowed someone without a four-year degree to buy a house, raise a family and retire disappeared.

Then came the major policy decisions.

1994: NAFTA took effect after being negotiated under President George H. W. Bush and implemented under President Bill Clinton.

2000: President Clinton signed Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China.

December 2001: China entered the WTO.

The argument was simple:

Open global markets.

Move production where it is cheapest.

Give American consumers cheaper products.

And perhaps greater economic integration would eventually change China.

That was the BET.

Then came what economists later called:

THE CHINA SHOCK.

Between 2000 and 2010, America lost almost 6 MILLION manufacturing jobs.

Not all because of China.

Automation mattered.

Technology mattered.

Recessions mattered.

But researchers estimate Chinese import competition contributed to roughly 2–2.4 MILLION American job losses from 1999–2011.

And here is what Washington missed.

A worker who lost a factory job Monday did NOT magically find an equally good job Tuesday.

Some towns never recovered.

Wages fell.

Communities declined.

Families were disrupted.

The economist said:

“The economy will adjust.”

The worker discovered:

I AM the adjustment.

Then America sold the next generation another idea:

GO TO COLLEGE.

The factory job your father had was disappearing.

So get a degree.

Borrow money.

Enter the new economy.

Student debt went from roughly $340 BILLION in 2001 to about $1.65 TRILLION today.

Think about that generational progression.

Grandfather:

Factory → paycheck → house → family.

Father:

Factory closes → economy restructures.

Son or daughter:

Borrow tens of thousands of dollars because now you need a degree to compete.

Meanwhile politicians in BOTH parties kept the basic globalization model moving.

Then COVID hit in 2020.

Suddenly America discovered that the cheapest supply chain isn't necessarily the safest supply chain.

Pharmaceuticals.

Semiconductors.

Medical equipment.

Critical minerals.

Electronics.

Industrial components.

So much had become dependent on production thousands of miles away.

President Trump had already begun challenging that model.

In 2018, he imposed major tariffs on Chinese goods.

Washington screamed:

TRADE WAR.

And yes, tariffs can raise costs.

That criticism is legitimate.

But President Trump was asking a fundamentally different question.

For decades Washington asked:

Where can we make this CHEAPEST?

President Trump asked:

What does America NEED to be able to make itself?

Then something interesting happened.

President Biden came in…

…and kept many Trump-era China tariffs.

Industrial policy returned.

Semiconductors became a national-security issue.

Critical minerals became a national-security issue.

Domestic manufacturing became a national-security issue.

Why?

Because the argument had changed.

Now President Trump is back.

And Americans are understandably looking at:

Gas.

Groceries.

Rent.

Insurance.

Interest rates.

Mortgage payments.

Those bills matter TODAY.

But underneath that noise, America is attempting something much bigger:

Rebuilding domestic manufacturing.

Rebuilding supply chains.

Expanding semiconductor production.

Expanding pharmaceuticals.

Expanding steel.

Expanding energy.

Expanding advanced manufacturing.

Companies including TSMC, Micron, Apple, NVIDIA, Hyundai, GM, Ford, Eli Lilly, Roche and Johnson & Johnson have announced major U.S. investments.

But understand this:

An announcement is not a factory.

Factories take YEARS.

Semiconductor fabs take YEARS.

Mines take YEARS.

Supply chains take YEARS.

Workforces take YEARS to rebuild.

So here's the contradiction.

America spent roughly 40 YEARS building this economic model…

Then expects President Trump to reverse it in roughly 20 MONTHS.

Read that again.

FORTY YEARS IN.

TWENTY MONTHS OUT.

You should criticize President Trump when policies fail.

Demand lower prices.

Demand results.

Demand accountability.

But also understand what is happening beneath the daily headlines.

America spent decades telling capital:

GO WHERE PRODUCTION IS CHEAPEST.

Now America is trying to tell capital:

BUILD IT HERE.

That transition was never going to happen overnight.

The real question isn't whether every Trump policy works.

Some won't.

The question is:

Twenty years from now, will Americans look back at this period as the moment the country finally understood that the CHEAPEST economy isn't always the STRONGEST economy?

Because millions of Americans already lived through what happened the last time Washington made that gamble.

They watched the factory close.

They watched the jobs leave.

They sent their children to college.

They watched the debt pile up.

And now America is trying to build some of it back.

That is the story underneath the noise.

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

Grab the Popcorn and Enjoy the Erupting Democrat Civil War https://t.co/jqa2TeDItx

Please vote! For God’s sake VOTE!

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@WydRomanX Bar code on the wine bottle

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@paglii_dewanii The mouse and the book next to it

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

What Denmark did is horrific!

[Rod D. Martin @RodDMartin]

Denmark’s Monstrous Human Rights Abuses in Greenland

Copenhagen took Greenlanders’ children, violated their bodies, and forfeited any right to rule their distant colony. Greenlanders want independence, but can’t afford it. There’s a solution.

Amarok Petersen was 13 years old when Danish doctors implanted an IUD in her body. No one told her. She discovered it only when she was 27, after years of severe uterine problems, when another doctor finally found the device. By then, the choice to have children had been stolen from her. Years later, she learned that doctors had also removed her fallopian tubes without telling her.

“The Danes don’t see us as humans,” she said.

Last week, two expert investigations put the weight of an official record behind what Petersen and thousands of other Greenlandic women — out of a total population of just 57,000 — had tried to tell for years. Denmark’s treatment of Greenlanders was not “benevolent stewardship” marred by “a handful of mistakes.” It was colonial abuse inflicted on their bodies, their children, their families and their sovereignty.

It also conveniently produced exactly the result Copenhagen wanted: Greenlanders’ birthrate collapsed, the growth of the native population slowed sharply, the percentage of the population that’s Danish thus increased, and Denmark’s annual costs to maintain the colony were controlled.

The new data demolishes Copenhagen’s claim to be Greenland’s benevolent guardian. Denmark has forfeited the moral authority — and the moral right — to rule the island. Greenland’s future rightfully belongs to the Greenlanders. The problem is, they can’t afford the independence most of them want.

There’s a solution.

Their Bodies, But Not Their Choice

Denmark’s forced contraception campaign was staggering in scale. By the end of 1970 alone, nearly half of all women of childbearing age or younger had been fitted with IUDs, mostly without their knowledge or consent.

In addition to IUDs, the program included contraceptive injections and other interventions, largely disguised as other procedures. This crime against humanity continued through 1991, when Greenland finally wrested its health system from its colonial overlord’s control.

The new human-rights investigation heard from 354 women describing 488 separate incidents. Of 410 reported IUD insertions, 300 women said they had never consented. In another 63 cases, investigators had no consent information at all.

Nearly one-third of the women were 14 or younger at the time; more than half were minors. Some were just 12 years old.

These were not adults making informed medical decisions. They were schoolgirls summoned to clinics, fitted with devices they did not understand, and sent home in pain. Some bled. Some developed infections. Some suffered lasting physical and psychological damage. Some, like Petersen, lost the ability to bear children even after discovering what had been done.

One team of investigators found reasonable grounds to believe that Denmark’s conduct in imposing measures to prevent births met the definition contained in the Genocide Convention. The investigators stopped short of finding genocide because they could not establish specific intent for that exact crime. That distinction will matter in court, reducing possible claims against the Danish government. It does not rescue Denmark’s reputation.

Nor does Copenhagen seriously dispute the charge. In September 2025, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen acknowledged that thousands of women and girls had received IUDs, many against their will. She admitted that Greenlanders had been subjected to systematic discrimination precisely because they were Greenlandic.

To her credit, she apologized on behalf of Denmark. But it’s far too little, far too late.

Denmark treated Greenlandic women not as patients or citizens, but as a herd to be culled. Petersen put it more plainly: “They took our resources. They took our bodies. And then they told us to thank them.”

Then Denmark Took The Children They Had

A state that believed it could decide which, if any, Greenlandic women would be allowed to become mothers also presumed to decide which Greenlandic mothers were allowed to keep their children.

The United Nations has reported that Inuit children from Greenland living in Denmark were seven times more likely than Danish-born children to be taken and placed outside the home. Danish authorities relied on standardized psychological and “parenting competency” tests developed for Danish parents, in the Danish language and within Danish cultural assumptions.

They then used those tests to judge Greenlanders whose language, emotional expression, extended-family structure and child-rearing traditions were profoundly different.

The result was both predictable and monstrous. Danish institutions defined Danish behavior as normal, interpreted Greenlandic standards as inferior, and took Greenlandic children from their families on that basis.

Mothers described being assessed without adequate interpreters. One says she was forbidden to speak Greenlandic to her twin sons during visits. The boys eventually lost their mother tongue as well as their mother.

It was a systematic effort to erase the Greenlandic population and culture for the benefit of an imperial master.

Denmark only abandoned the standardized tests for Greenlandic families in 2025, replacing them with assessments by a specialized unit with Greenlandic language and cultural competence.

Yet mere months later, authorities removed Ivana Nikoline Brønlund’s newborn daughter approximately one hour after birth without applying the new procedure. Denmark’s Social Minister called the failure a serious error. Yet only after widespread political outrage was the decision reversed, allowing mother and child to reunite.

This is not ancient history: this is yesterday.

Greenland Wants Independence. But It Can’t Afford It.

Greenlanders have been voting their way toward independence for nearly half a century. Understandably, more than 70 percent approved Home Rule in 1979. In 2008, 75.5 percent approved Self-Government — an arrangement that formally recognized Greenlanders as a people with the right to self-determination, and that established a legal path to full sovereignty.

By January 2025, a Verian poll found that 84 percent wanted independence, and 56 percent would vote for it even if the referendum were held immediately.

The hesitation is not the destination: it’s the price. Independence is expensive, and as badly as Denmark underfunds its colony, its colony doesn’t have the money to replace what it does spend. Independence means more than raising a flag.

A sovereign country must finance its government, build infrastructure, create and maintain embassies around the world, provide social services and defend an enormous, resource-rich island sitting astride the Arctic and Atlantic approaches to North America.

Greenland cannot do all of that alone. Denmark adds very little, but it’s far more than Greenland can do for itself.

So Greenland is not debating whether it should be free. It’s debating how to survive afterward.

The answer, of course, is a Compact of Free Association with the United States. It’s a model the U.S. has used successfully for and with Pacific nations such as Palau, Micronesia and the Marshall Islands. Each is a sovereign, independent nation. But each also receives many of the benefits of being part of the United States, defense included.

Citizens of these three COFA nations may live and work indefinitely in the United States, as nonimmigrants without a visa. They can qualify for American benefits ranging from Pell Grants and work-study programs to Medicare and Social Security. They may join the U.S. military. If disaster strikes, FEMA shows up. America invests and creates jobs in their countries.

A COFA provides all the benefits of inclusion in the world’s most powerful economy but without giving up independence. It also provides all the benefits of independence without the costs.

It’s genuinely “have your cake and eat it too.”

For Greenlanders, a COFA means independence without strategic helplessness. American capital and technology, far greater than anything Denmark can provide, would flow in to build the ports, airports, power systems, telecommunications, housing and processing facilities, all employing Greenland’s citizens and providing futures for its children.

Greenland’s vast deposits of rare earth elements, hydrocarbons and other minerals could create high-paying jobs and a booming local economy rather than leave the island dependent on a stingy annual subsidy. Its fisheries could be processed at home rather than shipped away so others capture the value. Its tourism — currently a fraction of Alaska’s — could make the country a fortune: just ask Iceland.

Greenland could even become the Arctic answer to Bermuda or the Caymans: a sovereign financial center inside the American economic system, with easy access to both New York and London. The nation could attract offshore wealth beyond anything it has ever imagined.

Perhaps even more important, Greenland's young people would no longer have to choose between dependence and emigration. Greenlanders could build a rich, modern country all their own.

So What Would America Get Out of This?

For America, the advantages are every bit as substantial. A free and friendly Greenland would secure the northern approaches to the United States, anchor the Greenland-Iceland-UK Gap, protect emerging Arctic sea lanes and enhance early warning, missile defense, space surveillance and North Atlantic monitoring.

A COFA would give American companies access to critical minerals outside China’s control while denying Beijing or Moscow the chance to turn Greenlandic poverty into a strategic foothold threatening the approaches to North America.

America does not need to actually own Greenland. It needs Greenland to be free, prosperous and able to choose a durable partnership with America. That is partnership, not colonialism: indeed, it would replace the current colonialism with a true partnership. Greenlanders would own Greenland, while both nations become richer and safer.

This solves Greenlanders’ long-term problem even more than America’s. But it also solves a problem that almost no one in today’s ahistorical political class grasps. Despite its shameful behavior, Denmark is America’s friend today. But no one can guarantee the future.

The peaceful North Atlantic order is a constructed alignment, not a law of nature. The structure of power and interests may change. The map does not. And leaders should not base the security of those entrusted to them on utopian dreams or “permanent” alliances and institutions.

The example of Diego Garcia is a stark reminder. America chose Diego Garcia, its most vital Indian Ocean base, in part because of Britain’s “unquestioned sovereignty” over the island. Britain remains one of America’s closest allies.

Yet Britain's socialist government has signed a treaty to transfer sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago to Chinese-aligned Mauritius. It assures the United States and its own people that all may rely on “ironclad” treaty protections for continued American and British access to the base. Yet that’s obviously nonsense.

Britain did not have to become America’s enemy to alter the strategic arrangement on which our security relies. Governments change. Treaties change. Interests change. Alliances change. Geography does not.

Greenland will remain astride North America’s Arctic and Atlantic approaches no matter who governs in Copenhagen or Nuuk five, 50, or 100 years from now. Nations do not have the luxury of assuming every future government will play nice forever. American statesmen must plan for the geography their grandchildren will inherit, not merely for the diplomatic comfort of the present.

Denmark’s abuses answer the moral question. Greenlandic independence answers the colonial question. Free association with America answers the economic and strategic questions. It also enables what last week’s reports make clearly necessary, but which would be impossible without American help.

Denmark’s rule must end. Greenlanders must be free. But for that to happen, America alone can offer them a future in which independence means sovereignty, prosperity and security — not poverty, vulnerability or a new Chinese master.

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@bosversenecemre Genevieve. It was my grandmother’s name, my middle name and my granddaughter’s name. Don’t hear it very often.

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@samstein @barnes_law @JoePerticone Oh wow. Another doomer and fake news spouter.

[Andrii Telizhenko @TelizhenkoAndy]

@HunterBiden @HunterBiden why do you always lie?
BLUE STAR STRATEGIES the company that was lobbying Burisma and through Amos Hochstein informing @JoeBiden on your troubles at the company also took money from Pavel Fuks more than 100k and did his lobbying in 2019 -Pavel today resides in London

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@tugce190333 No second hand on the clock on the right.

[True Stormy Joe @truestormyjoe]

Day 228

I received a gift in Dec of 2025
It sends daily Bible Verses, Scripture Passages, Spiritual Growth and Encouragement.

I will share them each day.

With the hopes that it might help someone out there.
If that someone isn't you, no need to be negative please just scroll.
It's not a decode or hidden message.
If you R/T maybe this will find someone that needed to hear this.
God Bless

[Steve Kirsch @stkirsch]

The study that I think would settle this is looking at kids who were developing normally and who suddenly regressed over a very short period of time (days). There is a define ONSET day.

Then you look for what happened in the previous five days and see if there's a common trigger.

If there isn't I lose. If there is and it is vaccination, I win.

If someone would like to propose a more sensitive study than that, please propose it here.

[The Realistic Nurse @TheRealisticRN]

🚨 BREAKING: This week the American Academy of Pediatrics — the group that shapes the childhood vaccine schedule — told the country it's "neutral."

Their words: "we go by science, not politics."

So I pulled their tax records. Here's who actually pays them..

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) runs on ~$138 MILLION a year.

Its corporate "partners" — $50,000+ donors — include the vaccine makers themselves:
Pfizer, Merck, Moderna, Sanofi.

Source: their own IRS Form 990

On one AAP COVID-19 vaccine policy, the science outlet Undark found 9 of 16 committee members had taken money from vaccine manufacturers.

The published guideline said: "no potential conflicts."

9 of 16. They wrote "none."

And this isn't unique to the AAP — it's the pattern.

Peer-reviewed, JAMA Internal Medicine (2018): 57% of authors of clinical guidelines for high-revenue drugs had financial ties to the makers — and 1 in 4
payments were undisclosed.

The science documents the conflict of interest.

The AAP doesn't just take the money — it lobbies.

It keeps a full-time, four-person federal lobbying team and reported ~$789,000 in lobbying in a single quarter of 2026.

Ask why a "neutral" group of children's doctors needs its own lobby shop.

Same playbook, different drug.

AAP's 2023 childhood obesity guidelines urged doctors to consider weight-loss drugs for kids. 10 of the authors had taken money from those drug companies.

Disclosed in the guideline? No.

In 2011 the Gates Foundation paid the AAP $1,419,200 — in the Foundation's own words — "to organize and facilitate immunization education and advocacy
efforts among pediatricians."

Paid to advocate.

Why it matters: in 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from most lawsuits.

Since then a federal program has paid ~$5.5 BILLION for vaccine injuries (HRSA).

The makers are protected. The group promoting the schedule takes their money.

The question every parent deserves answered: is the group that calls itself "neutral" being paid by the companies that profit from the schedule?

The documents say yes.

If you want the documents mainstream accounts won't show you, follow
@therealisticrn.

I'm a nurse. I bring receipts, not fear.

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@pfxdkmrhns @JoeTippensl All Family Pharmacy.

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@US_Wellness_ AI. Do you trust it?

[Lena Potts @LenaPotts13]

@sgtnewsnetwork What????