@UnityNewsNet Interesting how (certain) journalists rely solely on what ‘they’ call facts, when in reality, the vast majority of those ‘facts’ are nothing more than simply repeating the official line that’s been drip fed to them by the powers that be - with zero questioning, or challenge!
@ChrisWickNews No.1 constantly spouts complete & utter giberish, whilst we're only 'allowed' to see, or hear what No.2 has to say if it fits in with the current narrative of the powers that be - sort of says it all really!
@TheEyes2022 Sadly, millions of people will go on to simply believe every official 'excuse' for all sorts of things going on right in front of their own eyes - they'll never manage to connect any of the dots for themselves!
@Free_ByTheSea Dean Wilson (company name), in 7 Dials - I've used Annie. There are 'cheaper' alternatives, but... if you want an amazing, quick & friendly service (at a 'reasonable' price)... give them a try. Nothing was ever a 'problem' for them!
@JamesMelville The ability to simply express & discuss (perfectly politely) a different point of view - without a mass ‘pile on’ by those who disagree!
@DocAhmadMalik Emergency 'Use' is not quite the same thing as being in an emergency situation. Emergency Use is simply defined as there being no other 'authorised' intervention - which as we all know, is complete bunkum!
It’s pretty obvious as to whether something has ‘gone off’ or not - the smell, appearance, ‘blown’ packaging, texture, discolouration, a bit of mould, curdling, etc… Whatever happened to simply using a bit of common sense?
@SandraWeeden The ‘expert’ in question (Greenhalgh) blocked me some time back, simply for daring to question her about her reasoning! That’s the state of ‘science’ though nowadays - you’re just not allowed to ‘question’ it… ever!
@EssexPR@RishiSunak Cabinet Ministers ‘rarely’ hold much experience in their various appointed roles. They’re usually just spokespeople for the people (often, well behind the scenes) making all the ‘actual’ decisions!
In a Cabinet reshuffle, Ministers ‘rarely’ have any real experience of the roles they’re appointed to - they’re simply new figureheads/spokespeople for the various departments. It’s the (permanent) Civil Service & Mandarins who draw up policies & make all the ‘actual’ decisions!
@BohemianAtmosp1 Same here! People I know who were staunchly pro-jab & berated those who chose to ‘decline’ it, are now acting/behaving like nothing ever happened - and never mention it anymore!
@JackieSharpe1 After just a few short months of clinical trials, it was officially declared to be a) 95% effective, and b) completely safe. But, after more than 2 years of real world use, we now know claim ‘a’ was/is false, so… how long before claim ‘b’ also turns out to be… ‘incorrect’?
The secondhand value of a non-compliant vehicle has now been slashed (who will want one), so basically, people will get a couple of thousand pounds for ‘scrap’ - people will still have to find a fair few thousand more from ‘somewhere’, to be able to afford a ‘compliant’ vehicle!
I’ve continued to listen to Londoners' concerns in recent months.
Every single Londoner with a non ULEZ compliant vehicle is eligible for financial support.
Expanding ULEZ was a difficult decision - but it's the right one to save lives.
The argument that ULEZ charges will only affect vehicles of a certain type/age is incredibly weak, as they can easily ‘change’ any of those parameters, simply at the press of a few buttons - and in due course… they will!