@Dfire8801@philosofveritas@IllyrianJ2bL283 Ignoring the slop arguements the implication for me is that there was a group north of NMD IA that had geneflow with Paenonians that is the pop we're looking for IA wise And it doesn't seem to be Cinamak. Perhaps Dardania proper? Also didn't Glinoe get a lot of matches?
@HeraldOfRome Did wasd pass you the Roman Serb average I made? Bare in mind I did ommit the Roman Greek and Levantine outliers in Viminacium for the most part.
@Kar_year_1785@m_izanami_@nrken19 Agreed. My main gripe with Thracians atm is where the hell their EEF came from I did some digging and the EEF culture that spawned them was wiped out by the MBA and they seem to be more EEF than the preceeding Ezero culture was.
@Kar_year_1785@m_izanami_@nrken19 Thracian IBD sharing is decently high with BA Anatolians but with Myceneans it's almost none. Their share seems to be with Isparta BA and Ilipnar Chalcolithic types.
๐งต: PCA of Southern European fine structure
This PCA uses EIGENSOFT smartpca on the AADR / Reich Lab v62 HO dataset. Modern West Eurasian references define the axes, while selected ancient populations are projected for comparison.
NK4 segregated quite blatantly from IBM in Pinhasi's and in absolute distance Aterians ones approach IBM closer, but still closer to Jebel Sehaba. This is likely obscures due to the Robusticity of Taforalt and the mixed Nature of the North African Paleolithic samples.
AuDNA of assimilated locals within Avar Pannonia between the 7th to 8th centuries CE. These individuals are mostly represented under the local Balkan lineage J-L283>J-Z8429.
Today their descendants are mostly represented in Mordovia within Mishar Tatar groups.