Kraken

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@jluishd73 @FuensantaLM La mejor forma de incluirles es tratarlos sin diferencias como a uno de nosotros. Por eso las quitan, para dejar de señalar las diferencias que lo que hacen es que cada vez haya menos inclusion.

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@Comunacho1 @Aracnephobia Si no te quieren por altura lo mejor es que no estes con ellas, solo esquivas balas. En mi opinión mucho más importante las forma de ser y los valores de una mujer que como es físicamente. Y si tacha a alguien por ser bajo lo único que quiere es un triste lío o ni eso.

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@fernandabustil1 El mero hecho de que alguien justifique y apoye un asesinato de 2 niños es una locura, da igual quien sea o lo que haga. No hay justificación al igual que no la hay para las guerras. O entonces por tener un trastorno soy libre de matar? Igual Hitler no era malo, solo loco no?

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@maddoxrules @libsoftiktok I'm sorry to hear that. Here en Spain we got the same thing excepting of that Trump said sadly. Here we pay taxes to paint benches on purple and let ilegals to live from us (not all, some come to work) but others just to do crimes (we let criminals in, no control).

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@Malafama1944 @pireman__ Que tengan en cuenta que los hombres pueden tener depresión tambien! O es que la depresión solo puede venir de un lado? Entiendo el punto de la depresion por el cambio de cuerpo, pero si es cosa de 2 (debería siempre) tambien puede ocurrir al reves. Un hijo es un gran cambio!

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@perramalditaaa2 @mary_paredes Y si, si son personas y tienen todos los derechos, por eso si una prostitua elige trabajar como eso por su cuenta pues no puede ser una violación y menos si NI SIQUIERA SUCEDE, payasita.

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@perramalditaaa2 @mary_paredes Pero no decias que las prostitutas también eran personas?? Aclarate no?

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@Garaa0fTheRage Don´t think people justify it but support the guy as it makes them to hear that we want being able to own the games we pay for. (Maybe this it´s not his real reason to do what he does but at least it´s what it makes). So not justify what he does but support the cause he fight for

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@hrgiger44 @healingaming If the transtition or change is a must it´s not a problem, but we should do a good change. The primary thing people want is to being able to own what they pay for to avoid paying for a game which then closes and you are not able to play o download anymore.

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@hrgiger44 @healingaming I agree on that, but I seeing the fight not just only about the physical media but on atleast being capable of own that digital games we buy. That´s exactly what I want.

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@Alsaucemonster @ChristinaTasty That's a good question. Would this even affect Rockstar that much? Maybe they lose some inversors, but as it wouldn't be a playable version on most platforms then I would say that It wouldn't be a big problem on selling meaning. It could get to some sploit

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@hrgiger44 @healingaming There is an advantage on criminals, they don´t need to follow the law. It´s not about pushing for illegal tactics, it´s for pushing for a change. Starting with better cibersecurity and respecting owning rights (on both ends)

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@hrgiger44 @healingaming Probably, but the secondary effect could be a change, that´s why people support him. He´s not the one to make the change, but if he can make the message to get attention eventhough he could want other thing then it´s something to start with.

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@hrgiger44 @healingaming Would be nicer to just being heared and let the property for all being respected, that´s the change we should hope to happen, but it´s hard to get a company to fight for these. If you get to get a multimillionare I hope you could fight for us (I know you will so I hope that)

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@hrgiger44 @healingaming I mean I wouldn´t even enter on their websites. But yeah, he or they are not also pure activist/hacktivist (so black hat, i know i did an error before, i´m sorry). I don´t defend his actions, but his cause o collateral cause yes. It´s illegal yes, but he or they are not losers.

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@harvey_ooya @hrgiger44 @healingaming You guy are clever, appreciate your previous correction and sorry for the missconception of black and grey hat. (I personally don´t like to support this activities, but I also understand the part where he gets attention for us to be heared).

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@harvey_ooya @hrgiger44 @healingaming Yeah that´s right, he is a black hat but a hacktivist not a grey hat, my bad on there sorry. A black hat but not hacktivist would be worse but he is a black hat as he is still hacking with a bad intention or atleast ilegal. Fight for our rights don´t seems to be bad, but illegal

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@hrgiger44 @healingaming Yeah, they are not being hurted and the guy is getting attention that´s the point.

[Kraken @LFS_Kraken]

@hrgiger44 @healingaming You are defending a law which supports that you can´t own a videogame by buying it. So you are not owning it by piracy son it´s not a crime. This stupid law is defending piracy, and you are supporting it, as an independent game artist. Doesn´t this fight angaist your principles?