@RogelioPompa53@Wimbledon She already said she needs more time for singles, she's very aware she's not at a top level. However, a 44 year old not having played ONCE in 4 years and still takes it to a final set?
Consider me impressed
@youactuallyneed@BBCSport Because she's 44 years old, not played a single match in near 4 years, 44 years old (an age considered death in professional sport), and managed to beat the 3rd seeds in straight sets
@br3akthesystem@serzhaleksandr7@CuriosityonX Any scientific principle, even if we're certain beyond any doubt, remains theory, as it's impossible to fully prove it.
A theory just means it's our current best understanding. Einstein's work on gravity is so accurate that it works near perfectly
@JohnKrstyen_@CuriosityonX Don't worry, it's a completely appropriate question! The amount of satellites compared to the sheer volume of space they orbit is vastly significant. You'd need to reduce the craft:space ratio by a large factor to see more than one in a single frame - Space is just so massive!
@TiciaAIM@rachel_reviews For me it was too similar in obviously the language barrier, but also the "lone scientist" having to solve the problem, and the persistent flashbacks.
Both had different vibes in the end and I appreciate them both as individual films