In a recent YouTube video, Mark Carney had a confession to make: he will not meet Liberal emissions targets.
At least he was honest about that.
So, let's be honest about this: he pretends phasing out oil and gas was someone else's idea.
For a decade he was the worldwide CEO of the idea. He built his entire persona around Net Zero.
He claimed fossil-fuel-caused climate change was an "existential crisis", which in plain English means the world could end.
He was the UN's Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance where he recommended 65% of oil and gas should stay in the ground.
As Trudeau's Economic Advisor, he advised bigger and broader carbon taxes than even Trudeau had imposed.
He founded a banking alliance with the mandate to starve oil and gas of investment.
At Brookfield, his job was to use his political influence to get government handouts for his "green" investments (heat pumps, pricey "green" aviation fuel, etc.).
He made fortunes off an agenda that inflated costs and killed jobs for the working class around the world.
He didn't inherit this ideology. He built it. He milked it.
Now, he claims he changed his mind. Really? So, it’s no longer an existential crisis? Was he wrong for last decade?
If so, why go on hiking the industrial carbon tax by 500%?
Why has he not scrapped a single Trudeau-era anti-development law?
Why are 500 projects still waiting for federal approval?
Why has he not used his unprecedented powers in Bill C-5 to approve a single project?
Because it is all an illusion.
It was always about enriching the club. And it still is.
He will sound the alarm on new crises. The solution will be the same: heavy-handed, top-down crony capitalism—taxes, inflation, and debt for you, and handouts, bailouts, and carve-outs for the Liberal club. All to save us from the latest crisis.
The only way to change any of this is with a party that has been saying the same thing all along: get the government out of the way; free our businesses from all carbon taxes, red tape, and subsidies to unlock abundant, affordable energy. For Canada. For you.
@GadSaad Should we expect the government to improve our lives? I think we should expect it to get out of our lives as much as possible, and at the very least, not make our lives worse.
People are astoundingly stupid. My comments about the departure tax is not that I should be treated differently from anyone else. I am making a point about the extent to which taxes are confiscatory. As I have previously explained, there was a time when ZERO cents of income tax were levied in Canada and the US. Then bit by bit, that "temporary" measure, to be applied to only a few, and at a very low percentage rate of your income, becomes a mammoth monster that takes more than 50% of your earnings. It can occur because there are no repercussions if governments do not balance their budgets (other than voting them out). Hence, what starts off as a small temporary tax on a few becomes an existential theft that is orders of magnitude larger than the so-called illegal extortion tax of the Mafia. It can exist only because the great majority of people BENEFIT from this form of parasitic taxation. But someone has to pay for everyone else, and when you are that someone, you are not necessarily pleased to be funding the ultimate Ponzi scheme. I'm making a moral, philosophical, and ethical argument. It's not just about me.
Granular knowledge of how the Vancouver Condo Kings are the major supporters of people like Gregor Robertson, Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney was my past reporting beat. I’m not going back to it, other reporters need to pick that up. Read JWR’s chapter about meeting Trudeau in his friend’s pent house to understand who Carney is bailing out. I can say the Chinese money behind all these Liberals makes the story so much worse than a Liberal bail out of slick developers. This is scandalous and nationally ruinous.
Canadians have sent 240,000 postcards to senators urging them to oppose Liberal Bill C-9.
Until this morning, the Senate was hiding these postcards in a warehouse in Gatineau. This morning, they were moved to a Senate room, but they still aren't being delivered to senators.
🚨 You're angry. Good.
Anger without action is exactly what they're counting on. 🇨🇦
Here's how Canadians push back — today, not someday. Save this. 👇
—
📜 EMAIL YOUR SENATOR — C-9 + C-8
Both bills passed the House. Both are at the Senate.
Neither is law yet. ⚠️
The Senate is the last gate. Senators are appointed, not elected — they don't answer to a riding. They answer to volume.
When mail piles up, they notice.
Find your Senator → https://t.co/k21plyNvOj
Keep it short. Be polite. Use your real name. Tell them the bill number and the one section that scares you most.
A five-sentence email from a real Canadian beats a thousand-word form letter every time. 📬
—
📜 BACK THE LAWYERS ALREADY IN THE FIGHT
Three non-partisan organizations are doing the legal work in court right now — while most Canadians don't even know their names.
Follow them. Share their posts. When they file, X's algorithm decides whether Canadians see it. We decide what the algorithm sees.
◦ @CDNConstFound — Canadian Constitution Foundation
Leading the public legal analysis on C-8 and C-22. At the Supreme Court right now on the notwithstanding clause case. https://t.co/eiZaEIYzJG
◦ @JCCFCanada — Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
Active campaign against C-22 mass surveillance. Bruce Pardy is their Executive Director. https://t.co/IeaPMB5AIB
◦ @cancivlib — Canadian Civil Liberties Association
Opposed C-9 alongside Muslim, Catholic, Orthodox Jewish, and evangelical leaders. https://t.co/612HnQACAG
If you can donate — do it. If you can't — amplify them. Both matter. 🫱
—
📜 THE SUPREME COURT CASE EVERY CANADIAN SHOULD BE WATCHING
March 23–26. Six provinces — Quebec, Saskatchewan, Alberta, BC, Ontario, Manitoba — filed against Ottawa at the Supreme Court.
Why? Because the federal government is arguing to NARROW the provinces' constitutional ability to push back when Ottawa overreaches.
This is the case that decides whether your province can still say no.
Decision pending. ⚖️
When the ruling drops, the six provinces that filed need to hear from their residents — fast. Set a notification on their AG offices now.
—
📜 CALL YOUR PREMIER — 7/50 IS NOT A SECRET
Most Canadians have never heard of it.
It's called the 7/50 amending formula. Seven provinces representing 50% of the population can force constitutional change.
No Prime Minister can block it. 👀
Alberta is already using the Sovereignty Act. The premiers who need to hear from their residents next: Saskatchewan. Ontario. New Brunswick.
If you live in one of those provinces — you have leverage most Canadians don't even know exists.
Use it. 📞
—
📜 TAG YOUR MP. BY NAME.
Senators read mail. MPs read mentions. Both move when constituents are loud and named.
Look up your MP → https://t.co/UWOYdeA5AD
Find their X handle. Tag them. Tell them which bill, which section, why.
Doesn't matter what party. The NDP voted against C-9. The Conservatives proposed the C-8 amendments. Elizabeth May voted against. The Bloc voted with the government.
The receipts cross every aisle. 🇨🇦
—
This isn't liberals vs conservatives.
It's whether Canadians can still speak, organize, and be heard.
They are betting we won't show up.
Prove them wrong. 🫱
Which one are you starting with today? Drop it below. 👇
We give Canadians the receipts they haven't seen yet. Stand on Guard 🇨🇦 Share this with someone who hasn't seen it yet.
#StandOnGuard #StandOnGuardCanada
We are learning that the Liberal government, now holding the slimmest of majorities in the House of Commons, intends to assert control over all parliamentary committees—over votes, witness selection, points of order, agendas, and more.
Committee work is among the most important responsibilities of Parliamentarians, full stop. It is where legislation is thoroughly examined to ensure that decisions made by government serve the best interests of all Canadians.
While the Liberals are entitled to seek greater control, what I witnessed firsthand in Ottawa last week was troubling: a tone of arrogance, along with the mistreatment of some witnesses who expressed views not aligned with the party in power.
This is what is unfolding, and Canadians should be aware. Parliament will look very different over the next three years—even with only a razor-thin majority.
@TheCarneyFiles@LasIslands You should draft a letter template that people can use to send to the premieres office, their local MP, etc whoever else. We need to start flooding them directly, vs social media. Then we can all post about how we emailed directly. Actionable next steps of resistance would be...?
In the last election, 23,024 Canadians voted for Chris d'Entremont as a Conservative, yet he crossed the floor.
27,055 Canadians voted for Michael Ma as a Conservative, yet he crossed the floor.
30,343 Canadians voted for Matt Jeneroux as a Conservative, yet he crossed the floor.
2853 Canadians voted for Lori Idlout as a New Democrat, yet she crossed the floor.
8,113,484 Canadians voted for the Conservatives because they wanted change and they successfully denied the Liberals a majority government at the polls. Yet, because of these floor-crossers and Mark Carney's blatant disregard for the will of the voters, Canadians are now getting a majority they DIDN'T VOTE FOR.
Regardless of your political party and beliefs, this should be concerning to all.
@by__brittany Ask your pharmacist for calmilyn if it gets unbearable or keeps you up at night. The best cough syrup I've ever taken for intense, incessant coughing. Not all drug stores have it.
BREAKING
The Liberal Chair of the Health Committee abruptly shut down today’s meeting, even though the University of Toronto was summoned to testify.
Conservatives exposed that the University of Toronto is making over $45 million a year training foreign doctors sponsored by authoritarian regimes.
These doctors leave Canada as soon as their training ends.
Meanwhile, Canadians who study medicine abroad are told there is “no training capacity” for them back home.
Why are the Liberals silencing us from asking questions?
More to come.
DOCUMENTS: Feds @HICC_ca admit they faked construction site as backdrop for PM @MarkJCarney promise of “faster, smarter” home construction. Gov’t paid $32,707 to have contractors install and then disassemble temporary structure for TV cameras.
https://t.co/5kD1AkaOuR #cdnpoli@ArnoldViersen@gregorrobertson