J. Vega

[Kenneth Neil @KennethNeil19]

Fuck

[John @TheCassiniGames]

If Bethesda developed GTA 6... 💀

📽️ YT/guimazr

[Bad Hombre @Badhombre]

Did you post this from the $1.5 million home in Martha’s Vineyard, the $1 million home in Boston, the oceanfront villa in the Bahamas, or the condo in Fort Lauderdale?

[JudoJD @judojd]

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

[Anna @AnnaTheWise1]

She posted this when young people at a music festival in Israel were being hunted and murdered by Jihadists.

[Angry Bootneck @AngryBootneck]

They castrated everyone at the Bataclan, blew up the Manchester Arena, fucked 250,000 kids and lopped Lee Rigby's head off in the middle of the street, but apparently, Muslims are at risk amongst the middle-class white kids at Reading Festival. 🤣🤣

[Retard Finder @IfindRetards]

Retards will cut their own tits or dicks off, demand you call them a different name and use different pronouns, then say renaming a lake crosses the line.

Retard world.

[Oilfield Rando @Oilfield_Rando]

We live in a country where you can get debanked over the wrong political opinions by the companies who issue credit cards to jihadists who decapitated civilians

[Bad Hombre @Badhombre]

Amazing. Simply amazing.

[Retro Bleach 📺 @Retro_Bleach1]

Ichigo from other perspectives

[James Lucas @JamesLucasIT]

Either a medieval forger invented a technology we still cannot reproduce in 2026, or the most famous event in history left physical evidence behind. Science has spent a century looking for a third answer, and never found one...

It is called the Shroud of Turin, a strip of linen about fourteen feet long, and on it is the faint image of a bearded man, front and back, marked head to foot with the wounds of a crucifixion.

Believers say it wrapped the body of Christ, while skeptics say it is a clever medieval fake. What most people don't know is how genuinely strange it becomes the closer you look...

For centuries the cloth showed only a dim brown shadow. Then in 1898 an amateur photographer named Secondo Pia took the first photograph of it, and in his darkroom he froze: the negative was not a blur, it was a clear, lifelike, portrait of a man.

The image on the cloth behaves like a photographic negative, five hundred years before photography existed. No one has ever explained how a medieval forger could have conceived of such a thing, let alone produced it.

But it gets stranger.

When American scientists, the STURP team, examined the Shroud directly in 1978, they found no paint, no dye, no pigment, and no brushstrokes. The image is not painted onto the cloth. It exists only on the very outermost surface of the fibers, a scorch-like discoloration a fraction of a micron deep.

They ran five days of tests and left with the same conclusion everyone since has reached: they could not say how the image was made. To this day, no reproduced technique fully accounts for it.

Many suspect the image was made by a sudden burst of radiation, because that is the only thing anyone has found that comes close. When Italian scientists at ENEA, the national research agency, spent five years trying to recreate it, they managed a faint, shroud-like coloration only with bursts of ultraviolet light from lasers that did not exist until the twentieth century. And to reproduce the full image across an entire body, they calculated, would take a flash of ultraviolet power on the order of thirty-four trillion watts, more than any light source ever built can produce.

Then there is the body: the wounds are anatomically correct in ways a medieval artist would have gotten wrong. The nails go through the wrists, not the palms, which is how Roman crucifixion actually worked, and which contradicts almost every medieval painting of the cross, where the nails pierce the hands. There are scourge marks across the back, puncture wounds around the scalp like a crown of thorns, and a wound in the side. The stains have been identified as real human blood, and pollen and dust on the cloth have been linked to the region around Jerusalem.

However, in 1988 three respected laboratories, at Oxford, Zurich, and Arizona, carbon-dated a sample of the cloth, and the result seemed decisive: the linen dated to between 1260 and 1390, right around the time the Shroud first appears in the historical record. On this evidence the case looked closed: the man of the cloth could not be Jesus.

But it did not stay closed...

Critics pointed out that the sample had been cut from a single corner, an edge handled and repaired over centuries, and later analysis found cotton and traces of a dye-and-binder coating there, present nowhere else on the cloth, suggesting the tested patch was a medieval mend rather than the original linen. Then in 2022 a team using a new X-ray technique measured the aging of the flax itself and reported that its molecular breakdown matched cloth around two thousand years old, not seven hundred. That study is disputed, and it is not the final word. But it means the date is no longer settled as the world was told in 1988.

And that is the whole problem: with everything we know today, we should be able to say plainly what this thing is and make another one. We cannot. After more than a century as the most examined object in history, the Shroud of Turin has not been explained...

Whatever you believe, you come away with the same unanswerable question the image asks of everyone who looks at it: is this a forgery so far ahead of its time that it is a miracle in itself, or is it not a forgery at all?

[黒 Soul 🌹世界 @sakasamaszn]

This one

[J. Vega @Libhater1]

Zanka no Tachi

[粕茶🎀9/6Ua! @kschan_no_cos2w]

BLEACH好きな人は教えてね
話しかけますので、とりあえず好きな斬魄刀から

[田口智久 @TAGUCHITOMOHISA]

BLEACH#45 ありがとうございました。
単独での演出は初でしたが村田監督や制作が現場を支えてくれたおかげで担当する事ができました。
クリエイターたちにも恵まれその素晴らしい仕事の数々で支えられた話数となりました。
また、今話数の様な展開を快く了承してくださった久保先生にも感謝致します。

[Le R 🐺 @Yuta_R8]

Je vous jure qu’on en fait pas assez, si c’était Demon Slayer ou JJK ça aurait retourné twitter