The Orthodox Muslim met a gay fat dude on umingle and discussed the distinction between having homosexual feelings and acting upon them & why it is Morally wrong!!
Nice try cutting parts, shackles boy!!
Her is the full clip without cutting parts , he freezes and panics facing @muslimorthodoxy .
Counting the interruptions + showing the actual question that he runs from.
So we doing taqiyya now?😭😭 The context wasn’t even about the pre incarnation and even then the statement “Jesus is not a man” without qualifying is heretical because Jesus is a man right now in heaven.
And even if I grant you all of this why did you delete the comment after a few minutes if you didn’t think it was heretical? If you genuinely didn’t think it was heretical why delete it?
The Orthodox Muslim reacts to the disturbing AI generated clip of Sneako and demonstrates how it is fake and why he should sue the Duel Casino company!!
“This is psychological warfare. They’re trying to get him assassinated. They’re banking on somebody out there who’s crazy enough to actually go and eliminate Sneako.”
I don't even know how this proves ur point. The verse doesn't talk about children and I hope you try to argue this with me so I can do your funeral because we believe that for a person to consummate a marriage with another person they both have to be ready for marriage both physically and mentally and there can be no harm to either side. This is consensus!
but this is besides the point because this doesn't answer the question how do you know that X is immoral or Y is immoral? On what basis are you determining that something is immoral? So, for example:
P1: Nick defends Israel.
P2: Anyone who defends Israel is a retard.
C: Nick is a retard.
For this argument to work you have to grant me the premises within the argument otherwise my conclusion can't follow If the two interlocutors don't agree with each other on their axioms propositions and truth claims then there's no point in arguing if you don't even agree with each other on how you come to know things.
I don't even know how this proves ur point. The verse doesn't talk about children and I hope you try to argue this with me so I can do your funeral because we believe that for a person to consummate a marriage with another person they both have to be ready for marriage both physically and mentally and there can be no harm to either side. This is consensus!
but this is besides the point because this doesn't answer the question how do you know that X is immoral or Y is immoral? On what basis are you determining that something is immoral? So, for example:
P1: Nick defends Israel.
P2: Anyone who defends Israel is a retard.
C: Nick is a retard.
For this argument to work you have to grant me the premises within the argument otherwise my conclusion can't follow If the two interlocutors don't agree with each other on their axioms propositions and truth claims then there's no point in arguing if you don't even agree with each other on how you come to know things.