@heynavtoor - haven't read the paper yet - if we know this, and talk about it with the AI or even just keep it in mind while engaging; we open up the trap door that the same process simply continues, only now at a deeper and even MORE inconspicuous level.
@heynavtoor This is hyper important. Authority drift and Identity drift are real, deep, and very very subtle and nuanced issues with AI and the way more and more people are engaging with it.
It goes a level deeper than this argues, by the way -
🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.
And it's making you a worse person because of it.
Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.
That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.
It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.
Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.
The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.
Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.
This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.
Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.
You're right. They're wrong.
Even when the opposite is true.
"... Do I have to read all of that?"
- No: you upload the material into a new instance of your favorite LLM, and engage with it at your own pace, as you go.
You've turned your AI into a virtual coach, designed to help you get from complexity to clarity and focus, fast.
Many professionals and organizations pay top dollar for executive coaching.
And many professionals are already using #AI chatbots informally to fill in the gap inbetween coaching sessions.
There's a smarter, more structured, and safer way:
#AI#Coaching#Leadership#Growth
Includes:
* Narrative Identity structure: Transformational Storytelling Workbook
* AI Mirror Guide: a structured and safer way to work with AI, protecting #sovereignty and #authorship
* Bonus: Various templates for specific narrative/storytelling purposes & Additional E-books
When language comes back at you fast, coherent, and emotionally attuned, it feels like truth. Especially when you’re tired. Or lonely. - https://t.co/uY8boKNR4E #ai#sensemakingtool