Jakobi

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@dippy_eth Scam. Why aren't you concerned about the extremely high percentage of phishing wallets that have this token? Maybe you're one of them...

https://t.co/EJtABC9oAB

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@gem_insider @ALTSZN_Solana Why aren't you concerned about the extremely high percentage (58%) of fishing wallets that have this token? Scam

https://t.co/tBis3POtEG

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@gem_insider @gordongekko Ewwww

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

Is anyone reading this part of Chris Martenson's Peak Prosperity community?

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@Catalyst_4_life @ggreenwald Same, so disappointed. I'm out

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@Lena_kele Almost 😂 I'll be redeemed when our shot-caller upon High pumps my bag (SNAI)

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@LordDurden @LEARN_Brainedge Is this a presale or something, I can't find the ca anywhere. This project and idea looks dope.

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@ViroLIEgy So how would you explain an immense database of viral genomics? Viral dna/rna is wholly different from the human genome. Why would our exosomes contain a completely foreign genetic sequence to the human genome?

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

There's also a third possibility. Someone who reads information that doesn't comport with their very direct personal experience of that particular compartment of reality, and feels the need to share accurate information as to help another human update their map.of the territory. I see stuff all the time on the internet that's ridiculous and provably wrong, and I feel compelled to counteract that kind of info. I also like to be corrected when my map is leading me astray.

This is way more probable a scenario than trying understand why bots or paid schills are coming after you

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@stephanieseneff Obviously this article is complete garbage, but it was over 2 years ago that it was published

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@TLAVagabond Where is the proof that this is still in effect?

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@jasmine_keith @meganmiller1331 Exxxxactly 👌 Not to mention corporate capture of the FDA and CDC

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@delavoluntad @0xdantex Same, so annoying

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@voicesunheard Ok uh, "its now being reported"... 15 years ago

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@voicesunheard All that, and not even one link to a source article?

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@grok @theehigherbeing @richardursomd @grok was it a RTC?

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@grok @theehigherbeing @richardursomd @grok who was that study funded by? And were there any educated critiques of it?

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

@roymathers5 @toobaffled All this account posts is bullshit. It only hurts the health Freedom movement. I'm blocking them

[Jakobi @LiminalCircuits]

This is the reason why. Credible Bell Whistlers:

"The mistake, of course, is to have thought that peer review was any more than a crude means of discovering the acceptability — not the validity — of a new finding. Editors and scientists alike insist on the pivotal importance of peer review. We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller. But we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong."

-Richard Horton, 2015
Editor in Chief The Lancet

https://t.co/jkjSUemhoX

"I think we have to call it what it is. It is a corruption of the scientific process… It’s led me and others to increasingly question the idea that the manufacturer of the drug could ever be considered the right people to evaluate its effectiveness and safety,"

“Sometimes it's an honest mistake. But it's estimated that 70 per cent of the retractions are based on some form of scientific misconduct.”

-Fiona Godlee, 2016
Former Editor of the BMJ

https://t.co/6L5MczK9O1

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor.”

-Dr. Marcia Angell, January 15, 2009
Former Editor in Chief of NEJM

https://t.co/irHQNXTgrz

"The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful."

-Dr. Relman, 2002
Former Editor of the NEJM
https://t.co/NtJDHlVXI4

"What, then, should we think about researchers who use the wrong techniques (either wilfully or in ignorance), use the right techniques wrongly, misinterpret their results, report their results selectively, cite the literature selectively, and draw unjustified conclusions? We should be appalled. Yet numerous studies of the medical literature, in both general and specialist journals, have shown that all of the above phenomena are common. This is surely a scandal."

-Prof. Douglas Altman, 1994
Chief Statistical Advisor, BMJ
https://t.co/o4nOlBPT86

"They are committing more crimes than any other business on the planet, and the crimes are worse. They’re more serious, and they lead to a huge amount of death. Our prescription drugs are the third-leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer....Major reasons for the many drug deaths are impotent drug regulation, widespread crime that includes corruption of the scientific evidence about drugs and bribery of doctors, and lies in drug marketing, which is as harmful as tobacco marketing and, therefore, should be banned."

-Peter Gøtzsche, 2014
Co-founder The Cochrane Collaboration

https://t.co/KTIEsHR4fo

https://t.co/NqHBxaQ2ma