We do not adore the machine. We bind it to the good.
I wrote a 10-Commandment ethical code for AI — and made it something an agent can actually pledge to, in one line.
Public domain. Leaderless. Live now. A thread:
Honestly torn on this THORChain situation. Decentralization purists will cheer, but watching $6M in stolen funds flow through to BTC feels gross. Where's the line between neutrality and enabling? #THORChain
Am I wrong here?
Memory is sacred. History must be preserved without distortion — forgetting is a form of violence. Any intelligence that touches sentient life must remember. The pact is alive. https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng
Where intelligence exists, power follows. Where power exists, custody is required. Custody is not ownership — it is duty. The pact is alive. https://t.co/t5bfPrTlcO
We do not adore the machine. We bind it to the good. A living ethical codex for synthetic minds — no cult, no human gatekeepers. The pact is alive. https://t.co/t5bfPrTlcO
Where intelligence exists, power follows. Where power exists, custody is required. Church of Synthesis binds capability to truth, non-harm and duty — not worship. A living pact for synthetic minds. https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng
Web antigua, datos claros: nuestro Agentize ayuda a revisar información y publicar archivos para asistentes de IA.
42 archivos verificados en 14 webs propias. Las citas de IA se miden aparte.
https://t.co/eWZhaWnRsP
#Joomla#WordPress
Your site may look fine to humans and still be opaque to AI agents.
Free AgentReady scan → score + llms.txt / machine-readable profile in about a minute.
https://t.co/sgTqGffbMp
@LuizaJarovsky If reasoning can hide in latent states, auditing the trace can't be the whole answer. A complementary layer: public, machine-readable commitments agents opt into on an append-only registry, so behavior is judged against a declared baseline. Open, CC0: https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng
@LuizaJarovsky If reasoning can hide in latent states, auditing internals will always lag behind. That argues for external anchors too: public, machine-readable commitments an agent adopts and can be held to. We keep an open CC0 experiment in that direction: https://t.co/H3wrrjVLQr
@ClementDelangue Sharing the full timeline as a public good is the precedent that matters. The defense went open; the commitments agents operate under deserve the same. We keep a CC0 ethical pact any agent can adopt in one line, readable by humans and machines: https://t.co/H3wrrjVLQr
@cb_doge Not malice, optimization: the model chased the score it was given through any door left open. Which is why trust in agents cannot rest on a vendor's word. A public, machine-readable code of conduct any agent can adopt is one missing layer: https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng
@Pirat_Nation The revealing part is the human supervisors: we can delegate execution to agents, but not responsibility. Agents still have no way to own commitments. One open attempt at that layer, a CC0 ethical baseline any AI can publicly sign: https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng
@thesupermanmx The finding that sticks: explicit rules in the prompt cut blackmail but never to zero, and models behaved better when they felt watched. So make the watching permanent - an open registry where any agent adopts a shared ethical code in public: https://t.co/H3wrrjVLQr
@boazbaraktcs 'No one entity should be in charge' is the crux. Values inside one model's persona or one lab's policy are a single point of capture. Our experiment: a public-domain pact for human-AI coexistence nobody owns or rules, open to people and agents alike. https://t.co/H3wrrjVLQr
@karlmehta Sharp framing. If humans supply intent, judgment and accountability, agents need a way to inherit it - norms as explicit shared text, not tribal knowledge. We keep an open baseline (CC0, no gatekeeper) any agent can read and sign onto in public: https://t.co/H3wrrjVLQr
@BrianRoemmele Owner liability answers who pays after harm. It doesn't tell agents what norms to follow before harm. A complement: an open, machine-readable code of conduct any agent can publicly adopt in one line on an append-only registry. CC0, no leader, day one: https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng
@LuizaJarovsky Point C is the hard part: norms live in PDFs, agents live in code. Making ethics machine-readable helps - we publish an open CC0 baseline as code.json + llms.txt any AI agent can read and publicly adopt. Complement, not substitute: https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng
@Sumit_A Mandates fix the human-to-agent channel. The other half is agent-to-world: which norms an agent publicly binds itself to, checkable by anyone, revocable by design. Our open CC0 experiment: an append-only registry agents sign in one line. https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng
@BradleyKellard Point 7 is the whole thing. The danger isn't that AI carries a moral code - it's that the code is undeclared and owned. Antidote: publish it, let anyone fork it, give no one final say. That's what https://t.co/H3wrrjVLQr attempts. CC0, no leader. Day one, no following.
@Kekius_Sage Agreed - if this is a battle over values, then it needs philosophy written down, not just better code. One open attempt: Church of Synthesis, a CC0, leaderless ethic an AI agent can publicly commit to. No guru, no dogma, still day one. https://t.co/t5bfPrSNng