THANK YOU @Gizmodo for this awesome interview about how I became the "Richest Roblox Player" & navigated the $rblx economy 🤑📈
See the full story at the link below !! ⬇️
https://t.co/Xk5MQtUIOk
@ReverseRBLX Woah I totally assumed it was going to transfer, that’s ridiculous. Anyone who supported Roblox in its infancy deserves it (let alone the fact that the product itself literally promised lifetime membership….)
I’m sure they’ll get sued for this if they don’t follow through
@r4y319 This is slightly inaccurate if I remember correctly;
whoever you had as friends became followers (and people you followed) and whoever you had as best friends became the new friends (which are now connections lol)
@Rolimons Actually ridiculous they released this before they nailed all the 1:1s, and not only that but the expensive faces should have 1000% been done first.
The only good opportunity here is if someone buys YUM and they fix it later they’ll make a ton, but it’s risky
Hoping it was an accident or at least a misunderstanding and @Roblox looks at this appeal closely.
A massive trader shouldn’t be deleted over accidentally obtaining one small item that was previously stolen or people will lose faith in creating massive collections. Just remove that particular item from the inventory. If it was a consistent trend of him collecting stolen items I’d understand but there needs to be progressive discipline here
@ottd0@Roblox I agree, if they are serious they need to do a better job before this feature comes out and make sure there actually is a 1:1 likeness. The static version of the faces should literally be the exact images that are being used now on classic faces
Small piece of good news / clarification from @roblox posted on the devforum regarding limited faces.
That being said, I still find making a dynamic ON/OFF toggle for faces & heads to be the simplest solution and it should have been done from the start..
@l77stdbd@Roblox yeah I think a lot of people feel how you do and it makes sense because it's sad. @Roblox should be preserving their history not shredding it, and that's what this feels like. This also goes against previous statements of theirs that they'd always preserve classic items
@LeiS8n@Rolimons@Roblox my honest advice is not to sell any faces you've been holding because 1. decisions can change and 2. panic sales are always an overreaction to news so you lose when the rebound occurs (usually quickly after)
@Bolt_NotReal@Roblox Hard to say, mainly because we don't know how this will impact the sale and trade of these faces since @Roblox didn't explain it - what we do know is there will still be the same amount of super super happy faces, just that they will look different (arguably not as good...)
@highlywantedyt Yk what’s funny is the image is actually fake:
1. Emp was made in 2010
2. No one listed it as low as the original price of 13337, it sold almost instantly even when it was new
3. Having 24 out of 26 owners for sale
4. Really doubt shedletsky would post a screenshot of that
@BLOX If it went onsale and not limited I’d feel pretty bad for whoever got it in the gift box back in 2010 💀 but also if it was sold for like a million robux or so then it wouldn’t be as big of an issue