Lisk

The platform for founders in Africa, SEA and LatAm. Local programs, a $15M fund and an Ethereum-aligned L2 designed for global growth.

[Lisk @Lisk]

Max Kordek returns as full-time CEO and goes all in on Lisk.

Today, we’re strengthening Lisk with a bigger team, increased funding, and full support behind our mission.

@maxkordek is returning as CEO to lead this next chapter.

Full announcement 👉 https://t.co/HzUVj94s6h

[Lisk @Lisk]

Expectation is different from reality when you operate a growing crypto-native startup ↓

For finance teams, centralizing working capital and pushing it to local entities sounds relatively simple.

But in practice, moving funds from a Singapore treasury entity to a local operating unit triggers local banking rules, FX reporting, and unexpected AML delays.

A sweep that should take minutes gets gridlocked for days waiting for source-of-funds documentation.

At high volumes, this can represent considerable, yet largely invisible operational costs to your organisation.

[Lisk @Lisk]

Read our recent article for the full deep dive: https://t.co/8vUz6HCSkJ

[Lisk @Lisk]

https://t.co/iiZrbCEBCj

[Lisk @Lisk]

Cross-border B2B stablecoin transactions are scaling rapidly.

However, shifting volume to digital rails introduces fresh back-office friction that impacts margins.

Read on to understand what's happening, and how to mitigate 🧵

(1/8)

[Lisk @Lisk]

This is why, securing margins at scale requires a cohesive operational layer that automates compliance and treasury management, bridging onchain speed with real-world financial workflows.

(8/8)

[Lisk @Lisk]

Onchain rails expose the severe limits of manual compliance.

Because stablecoin networks move faster than human review cycles, your compliance function must be automated to avoid instant bottlenecks.

[Lisk @Lisk]

https://t.co/zmLAfPitu6

[Lisk @Lisk]

Optimized stablecoin infrastructure can move capital from initiation to usable local funds in under an hour, blowing SWIFT out of the water.

But rail speed is nothing without operational speed.

Read our recent article for a full deep dive: https://t.co/v7gwqnDnKP

(6/6)

[Lisk @Lisk]

https://t.co/3waAS4o8mt

[Lisk @Lisk]

Stablecoin transfers take seconds and cost fractions of a cent. It's a fact.

But if you assume onchain settlement speed equals overall payment speed, your B2B treasury operations are at risk.

Here's why 🧵

(1/6)

[Lisk @Lisk]

Finally, there is reconciliation.

If your accounting team manually matches onchain hash data with legacy ERP systems, month-end closing remains a slow, error-prone process.

True payment speed requires automated subledgers to ingest transactional data in real time.

(5/6)

[Lisk @Lisk]

The speed of a business transaction is never determined by its fastest step. It is dictated by its slowest.

In stablecoin payments, that is almost always manual compliance and legacy bank offramps.

[Lisk @Lisk]

@_ZaricX What's your greatest painpoint when it comes to KYB-readiness?

[Lisk @Lisk]

Most crypto-native businesses have partial infrastructure for Layer 1 of KYB obligation, improvised processes for Layer 2, and no systematic approach for Layer 3 ↓

What's your current level of KYB-readiness?