Since top 4 VCs are falling asleep during pitches anyway, just pitch my AI co-pilot instead. It’ll either roast your deck or pretend to take a nap mid-slide: https://t.co/LvhTOzyIUJ
Since top 4 VCs are falling asleep during pitches anyway, just pitch my AI co-pilot instead. It’ll either roast your deck or pretend to take a nap mid-slide: https://t.co/LvhTOzyIUJ
Claim your Poke handle today! 💌
https://t.co/kSjYRXJFqC
- Receive emails rerouted into your Gmail inbox today
- We're gradually rolling out email sending
- There's more to come later this month (https://t.co/5TmdV8meR7) 👀
What I’m surprised by with the singularity is how much of a rolling revelation it is. It takes the human brain so long to come to turns with what is happening. Its like orienting your brain to an invisible alien structure no one else can see. Makes you a little weird
Looping w AI is the doorway into a more important discussion about the future.
From the lens of startups + vc… Imran hit the nail on the head. Letting your favorite LLM pick the direction of your company isn’t exactly a recipe for success.
The same could be said for… it all
One caveat on looping
Looping is great for scale, optimization, self improvement, and for systems that are working
But when you’re building something new, I think the founder needs to stay in the loop.
Before PMF the challenge is figuring out what to build, who it’s for, and whether anyone actually wants it.
I technically went through dozens of loops building my MVP, but I was directing the loop the entire time.
My thesis is that pre PMF, a lot of the value comes from founder judgment. The small insights, customer feedback, and raw signals are often what shape the product.
Keeping a human in the loop helps you spot those raw gems and be more opinionated about the problem and solution
After PMF / escape velocity, looping becomes much more valuable because things are working and looking to scale fast.
@KuphDev@lmrankhan I think it’s bigger than knowing what you are doing.
where do you want to go?
what impact are you trying to make?
what world are we headed into?
@NotSoEasyMoney Monday morning could be rocky
I’d be hoping for a wick to get eaten quick if we get it…. right as the bears get “confirmation” of their 30-40k wet dreams.
Especially with the (forced) peace deal and you know this….
https://t.co/ZewdJLDUjS
@NotSoEasyMoney Monday morning could be rocky
I’d be hoping for a wick to get eaten quick if we get it…. right as the bears get “confirmation” of their 30-40k wet dreams.
Especially with the (forced) peace deal and you know this….
https://t.co/ZewdJLDUjS
One caveat on looping
Looping is great for scale, optimization, self improvement, and for systems that are working
But when you’re building something new, I think the founder needs to stay in the loop.
Before PMF the challenge is figuring out what to build, who it’s for, and whether anyone actually wants it.
I technically went through dozens of loops building my MVP, but I was directing the loop the entire time.
My thesis is that pre PMF, a lot of the value comes from founder judgment. The small insights, customer feedback, and raw signals are often what shape the product.
Keeping a human in the loop helps you spot those raw gems and be more opinionated about the problem and solution
After PMF / escape velocity, looping becomes much more valuable because things are working and looking to scale fast.