The line doesnt go out from middle to the left and the right,it goes in a circle.U go far enough left eventually you’ll meet someone who’s gone far enough right
@CSwampthing “The line doesn’t go out from middle to the left and the right, it goes in a circle. You go far enough left eventually you’ll meet someone who’s gone far enough right”
Бійці 63-ї ОМБр вивели 8 цивільних із Лиману і закрили їх собою від російського дрона!
Так після виконання основного бойового завдання бійці 7-ї роти 3-го мехбату організували евакуацію групи цивільних з-під ворожих обстрілів у Лимані. Попереду — дві доби операції, ворожі засідки та російські FPV.
На землі працювала ударно-пошукова група за участі французьких та американських легіонерів: Флеша, Ковбоя, Спада, Чандри та Фанти. З неба маршрути моніторила аеророзвідка, застерігаючи від ворожих засідок. Логістику та переправу на MaxxPro забезпечили мінометна батарея й підрозділ НРК.
На завершальному етапі ворожий FPV засік і атакував групу. Але один із бійців прикрив собою цивільних, зазнавши важкого поранення. Завдяки вчасним діям розвідвзводу його вдалося врятувати.
Серед врятованих цивільних — літня жінка, троє людей з інвалідністю на кріслах колісних та чоловік із важким пораненням ноги. І всіх вдалося доставити до безпечного місця.
Евакуація — це шанс зберегти життя. Третій армійський корпус закликає виїжджати з прифронтових міст завчасно!
The world has grown accustomed to reading about Ukrainians being killed. But how many are willing to look at what that actually means?
Tonight, a russian drone killed two people in Kharkiv. One of their bodies was literally torn apart.
These cocksuckers advocate for abandoning Ukraine saying it can't defend itself.
Factcheck it's hard for Ukraine to defend itself because of your fucking efforts @MearsheimerJ.
The throttling of Ukrainian access to Starlink (and Musk's evolving explanations thereof) has received virtually all the attention but the intercept is more disturbing because it directly involves an important US asset. The two episodes cannot be viewed in isolation. The simultaneous acts against Ukrainian defensive and offensive capabilities betray deliberate purpose, and each looks more ominous when considered together with the other.
SpaceX Blocked A U.S. And NATO Satellite to Assist a Russian Intercept After Crippling Ukraine's Air Defenses
The Math Proves the Reality that Musk doesn't want you to see.
On Oct 13-14, SpaceX restricted Starshield/Starlink during a 39-missile Russian attack, cutting Ukrainian drone intercepts by 23% and stranding U.S. personnel in Kyiv. Forty-eight hours later (Oct 15), SpaceX blocked U.S.-licensed NRO, Space Force, and NATO radar satellite ICEYE-X36 in orbit so Russia's COSMOS 2612 weapon could intercept it (99.89%-99.98% posterior)
Our Model Demonstrates that the Russian intercept of the US/NATO ICEYE X-36 satellite (contemporaneous with the throttling of Starlink) would not have been possible, and almost certainly not been attempted, without SpaceX resources. At a material opportunity cost, Russia sprinted its COSMOS satellite to intercept ICEYE X36. Based on a previous attempt in June during which X36 maneuvered to evade COSMOS, Russia knew that this would be successful only if X36 could not maneuver. On October 15, SpaceX fixed X36 in place by issuing a collision alert for a sub-kilometer approach with its Starlink 35856 when SpaceX's own data shows that the actual distance was 4.8-5.0x as great. SpaceX issued no warning to COSMOS despite the fact that its sprint was far more threatening than the stable X36 orbit. SpaceX did not maneuver its Starlink 35856 satellite to clear the supposed collision risk. How, absent coordination with SpaceX, could Russia have known that SpaceX would take actions that (a) misrepresented the danger posed by X36, and (b) resulted in the fixing of X36 thereby enabling COSMOS's successful intercept? Thus, SpaceX was directly involved in simultaneously compromising Ukraine’s defensive and offensive capabilities. The conjunction of these two events makes innocent explanations untenable.
The Pentagon Capture & Iran Round Two Trap: Pentagon CTO Emil Michael who cashed out $7M–$35M from Musk’s inner-circle SpaceX vehicles (M8/Gigafund 0.1 and M6/Valor M33 II) and KQ Partners / xAI (selling xAIfor $5M–$25M three days before taking over CDAO/OSCand 21 days before SpaceX bought xAI, while keeping M8, M6, M9, M10 & Nomadic open) and Pete Hegseth purged rival Anthropic in two hours, surrendered combat command over US drones used to attack Iran to Starlink’s "Terms of Service," and on October 2 named Musk Co-Director of Project Meridian to design the Pentagon's "Future of Warfighting" just as America enters Iran Round Twowith depleted Patriot/THAAD magazines and Russia feeding U.S. warship/aircraft locations to Tehran.
SpaceX’s actions in Ukraine raise serious questions about its alignment with US security interests and its reliability as a cornerstone of US defense. These questions are particularly troubling given the effectively irreplaceable position SpaceX has been granted by the Hegseth/Emil Michael Pentagon.
$SPCX $TSLA
Our full quantitative analysis below w/ @streetwiseprof
A Texas father who had lived in the U.S. for 25 years with no criminal record was finishing his night shift as an Uber driver when immigration agents detained him.
Without being able to speak to his lawyer or a judge, he was put on a plane and sent first to Ghana, a country where he had no ties. He was then sent to his home country, despite a determination by a U.S. immigration court judge that he could not be deported there due to likely persecution. https://t.co/2vMsbrSmr9
Musk algo boosting a Russian Federation bot account with less than 1,000 followers on a VPN. 1.8 million views with only 15K likes and over 1K comments.
@EuromaidanPress A scare tactic under the instruction of Trump admin. If I’m a Korean leader I’d be super worried on whether US can still hold its end of promises if battle hardened NK attacks
Elon is lying again. Right now, the absolute majority of Russian soldiers are volunteers or adult men who were mobilized back in 2022. Part of conscripts is negligibly small.
Elon Musk claims that Ukraine allegedly violated Starlink's terms of use and used the system on combat drones.
As someone who was inside the process at the Ministry of Defense, I can say with certainty that this is not true.
In February of this year, whitelists were introduced. Stationary terminals could be registered by both military personnel and civilians.
But for any satellite terminal to work while on the move, it had to be added to a special list and connected to the military Starshield system. Otherwise, no satellite communication terminals in Ukraine would work.
In other words, using civilian Starlink for drone missions was technically impossible. All drone missions that required satellite communication could only be carried out using Starshield.
We are very grateful to the United States and SpaceX for access to critically important satellite communications. Ukraine did not violate the terms of use.