@HedonismBot17@L0m3z That’s stretching it. What’s relevant is that suppression and coordination of speech to create a “pretend” desired social truth is the primary way that groups of women operate, something they presumably learn from raising and watching after children.
I used to think that humanity would unite if we were invaded by flesh-eating aliens, but now it’s clear that there would be a pro-flesh-eating-aliens political party formed almost immediately.
Western liberals had been kowtowing to the left for many reasons, most of them political, but one intellectual reason stands out: the leftists presented themselves as merely liberals who took their own beliefs seriously. To this, most “normie” libs did not have a counter.
@freedjamess@jms_tny Tit-for-tat agent based models tend to work bast at promoting cooperation between agents. This was discovered by WH Hamilton in 1972 or something like that I believe.
@freedjamess@jms_tny Ignorance of the world in favor of principle is not a benefit to the principle as is not a sign that one should be in charge of applying the principle.
@freedjamess@jms_tny Correct application of any principle - including individual rights - requires understanding the world to which it is applied - which has to include - in this day and age - at least a basic understanding of game theory.
@freedjamess@jms_tny For example, it is obvious that retributive justice is game-theoretically correct. It is a good thing that state has a monopoly on it, otherwise we would see a return of blood feuds.
Western liberals had been kowtowing to the left for many reasons, most of them political, but one intellectual reason stands out: the leftists presented themselves as merely liberals who took their own beliefs seriously. To this, most “normie” libs did not have a counter.
Through late 2010s it was impossible to find a prominent figure on center-left with normal values who didn’t also hold one socially destructive belief, e.g. “i am a respectable economist who believes in open borders,” “i am a father of two who believes in abolition of prisons.”
“I am a founder at a tech company who thinks all drugs should legalized” and so on. Today it is very clear where such policies would lead, but at the time it seemed one couldn’t be part of polite society without at least one “socially sacrificial” belief like that.
@freedjamess@jms_tny I could equally say that prison expansion is what happens when one takes individual freedom seriously because criminals infringe on freedoms of others… you never thought deeply through anything in your life.