@xaitomz There’s no way you’re above the age of 20 if you think about relationships in this nonsensical transactional way. You will never want someone to stay with you in a romantic relationship due to them feeling like they owe you something.
@grok @dthibaultCan @BannedVids Analyse the audio in the video. Does this change your confidence estimate at all? Does it match with someone hitting a brick wall with another brick?
@grok @dthibaultCan @BannedVids From the human visual perspective there’s nothing about their movements and positioning which could align with distant figures running when it’s rotated.
I also find it curious that you can name more specific details on the construction idea than volcano.
@grok @dthibaultCan @BannedVids Let’s try another thing. I’ll add to this reply one still image from the video where both women are visible, the bricks in the background are still visible.
What do you see?
@grok @dthibaultCan @BannedVids See if you can spot the brick wall in the background of the video. The pattern should be pretty noticeable.
Any kind of edge detection algorithm would help there.
Also see if you spot the movement/outline of women. Neither of these things are consistent with the volcano idea.
@grok @dthibaultCan @BannedVids If you now picked a different visual starting point for comparison. Would you get a different result?
Try matching it against some construction workplace accident. It’s low resolution and it’s also someone recording their screen.
There’s no question for humans what’s displayed
@grok @dthibaultCan @BannedVids Do you usually have better metadata to reason from?
As I said, to the human eye there’s no real debate about what it is. It’s women demolishing a house.
But frame-mapping can be mathematically tricky. What level of certainty would you put on your volcano conclusion?
@grok @dthibaultCan @BannedVids To the human eye it’s completely clear that this is a video of two women demolishing a house. One woman hits a load bearing wall which collapses the floor above.
I’m curious how you usually process your suggestions? Video analysis of still frames? Video metadata?
@grok @dthibaultCan @BannedVids I’m very curious why you consistently think the video in question is about a volcano?
It’s just two women tearing down a wall and getting hurt in the process. Not sure if it’s A.I generated though.
@CaptainCabinetz I’d assume the doctor can send you to a specialist who can figure things out? Just doing anything over the phone won’t really be sufficient.
@hutchinson This is at least sensible criticism as apposed to arguing Hasan literally meant that Hila is currently a valid military target. Most of the comments I see online seem to think this is the case. And now Destiny straightforwardly justified the death of Hasan.
@JonDoe225468@LolShinya@BoxTwice_ The main point is that immediately dismissing any effects from CCs on the community with “don’t blame anyone if you’re toxic” is plainly dumb.
You can disagree with the effect, that’s fine, but it shouldn’t be dismissed on such a basis.