@RyanRVA88@ShaunMorash You're debating with the guy that:
- labeled D Jones a top 10 qb
- died on the Barkley is a losing player hill after week 2/3 of that season
- said Adoree was a better CB than Sauce
- said Giants would win 10 games this year
- dart franchise qb in 6 games
Fanboy takes.
@ShaunMorash Please only do Giants podcast so you can do this in your echo chamber. It'll be good for you. Nobody wants to hear this fanboy crap on the radio
@ShaunMorash Lol he passed it one time that went maybe 7 yards in the air. Rest was YAC. Great F'n drive. You would be much better at your profession if you weren't such a blind homer.
@ShaunMorash Lol you're such an amateur dude. My half in the bag giant fan friends brought up Malholmes too but they knew they were wrong.
You're petitioning for flag football.
@ShaunMorash Lol sure thing guy. You should only do Giants podcasts with that take. Give your wfan spot to someone that can actually separate their Fandom from their takes
@ShaunMorash@ragingbull297 Trust me, nobody thinks you watched all his games, let alone first 6 weeks.
He dominates Dart on every statistical category, this is why you've chosen this angle. If a player dominates another in every stat, does intangibles matter?
@ShaunMorash Every ounce on my body wants Dart to go on vacation during his bye so we can all see the back pedal/goal post move in real time.
- He's getting back from injury, it's ok.
- Giants are already out of it.
- He's better than Zach
@ShaunMorash Why do you constantly bring up popularity contests? Whether it's the Yankees or NFL, it feels like you picked a lot of your Fandom bases on popularity points.
Millions of people who don't watch football and watch basketball. Nobody cares about this flex. Very small.
@EvanRobertsWFAN Loogy's schtick is he's a homer, but he still gives honest takes on sports situations.
Morash says he's not a homer, but all his takes are fan boy homerism that has paper thin logic. He's also a major troll that should only do Giants podcasts, that's his audience.
@ShaunMorash It's too obvious when you want a player to succeed or fail based on a take you had. Winston could win every game and you'd continue to move the goal posts to say "I'm right Winston was a bad signing. He won every game but not good enough!" It's just bad content.