South Tower - Tipping Top - Angular Momentum and the laws of physics
The ≥30° slant of the upper section of the South Tower (WTC 2) in rapid descent would appear to violate Newton’s first law of motion if we are only to consider conventional destructive mechanisms, such as fire, bombs or gravitational collapses.
An object in motion tends to stay in motion.
Applied to the tipping top section of the South Tower, it necessarily follows that the top would continue to tip and fall to the ground below, if indeed it is a rigid body.
Considering the law of conservation of angular momentum, the angular momentum of a rigid body is conserved unless another force acts on that rigid body — or if it ceases to be a rigid body.
This leads to a single irrefutable conclusion: we do not see this top section of the South Tower continue to tip because it was so rapidly converted into dust that it ceased to be a rigid body before gravity was able to accelerate it downward to the ground level.
What force was able to dematerialize this rigid body before gravity was able to bring it to the ground?
Certainly not a conventional destructive mechanism.
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://t.co/2d2S5GnY7v
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://t.co/WSe4IK6wMf
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance. - Albert Einstein.
A time comes when silence is betrayal. - Martin Luther King
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://t.co/0dOepkP8qe