@Tech_girl Exactly! The best AI coding setup shouldn't force you to choose between powerful models and your budget.
We're building LucentraCode so developers can use the models they love, code more, and spend less.
Would genuinely love to hear what you think if you give it a try! ๐ฉท
@rezoundous Those days donโt have to be over. Give LucentraCode a try. $20/mo gets you access to top AI coding models with $400+ usage credits. Might be the upgrade youโve been looking for ๐
2.29 BILLION tokens. ๐
$841 vs $20? That's the estimated gap in our cost model not actual comparable bills.
We looked at Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Devin, Kiro & LucentraCode.
Vibe coding shouldn't mean counting tokens or fighting usage limits.
#VibeCoding#AICoding
What if your coding agent actually understood your project from start to finish?
Better context caching, less forgetting, and every review building on the last one instead of starting from scratch.
That's the kind of AI coding we should be aiming for.
why does Codex seem to find more bugs every time you ask it to review the same code?
is it actually uncovering issues it missed before, or is it just finding new things to complain about?
Let's burst that bubble. ๐
What if you could use Claude, GPT, Gemini, and other top AI models all in one place?
No choosing sides. No juggling subscriptions.
And usage limits that make you question why you've been paying so much elsewhere.
That's what we're building
AI coding should be about shipping, not counting tokens.
That's why we're building LucentraCode.
One CLI. Multiple top AI models. More coding, fewer worries about usage limits.
Your flow shouldn't end with "try again later."
We're just getting started.
#VibeCoding#AICoding
@ardent__dev One good reason? A second opinion when Codex gets stuck.
Don't be loyal to a coding agent. Use whatever gets the job done.
Switching tools isn't betrayal. Paying for limitations out of loyalty is.
They're tools, not football teams.
@rezoundous Why stick with the old stuff when you can build your own with better features, more flexibility, and everything you actually need?
That's the fun part of AI coding now.
@giadotai Nah, UI is where your creativity comes in. AI is just there to refine your vision and bring it to life.
You can't prompt your way into having good taste.
AI coding is crazy right now.
You can build things in hours that used to take weeks.
But somehow, the biggest challenge is still making sure you don't hit your usage limit halfway through a project ๐
We went from fighting bugs to fighting usage limits.
#AIcoding
@alexcooldev Exactly. This is the problem weโre solving at LucentraCode.
Real products burn through AI usage fast. Weโre focused on making heavy coding workflows far more affordable without compromising on model quality.
And weโre just getting started.
@alexgilev Why choose ๐
We switch between Codex and Claude depending on the task. Thatโs actually a big reason we built LucentraCode one CLI, multiple top models, no tool-hopping.
@AndrewYNg Big one weโd add:usage headroom.
Getting good with coding agents takes repetition โ steering, reviewing, retrying, refining. Hard to build that skill when youโre constantly watching a usage meter.
Thatโs a big part of what weโre trying to solve with LucentraCode.
AI coding shouldn't come with a countdown timer.
Hey, we're LucentraCode ๐
One CLI. Your favorite AI models. Generous usage limits.
We're here to make AI coding more affordable, so you can focus on building.
What's your biggest frustration with AI coding tools?
#AICoding