@EricSco65187922@J0hnJohnJ0hn I love how stating his disappointment in the most mild way possible is "bitching about the politics" to you. Seems like you might not have a strong grasp on what this whole "democracy" thing is all about. People are allowed be disappointed when a vote doesn't go their way.
Anyone who sees this Tesla Roadster thing and thinks this means they are any closer to having a flying car is either clinically stupid or a literal child.
I feel like I'm going crazy reading people's "complaints" about the Lanterns finale. There's no way media literacy has gotten this bad already.
Just so many people missing obvious themes and completely misinterpreting scenes and then acting confused about what happened.
@JiminyDCricket@professorartoo@JimHalpert11198 Green with impurities is still mostly green, not yellow. Couldn't have charged the ring otherwise. Green rings can ONLY harness willpower, corrupted battery or no. It is likely the first step to making the first true yellow battery, but doesn't mean John is using fear.
@JiminyDCricket@professorartoo@JimHalpert11198 It's LITERALLY not. Lantern is still green. Ring is still green. You can't draw from fear as power with a green ring.
Yes, the lantern has a yellow impurity. You know what else did in the comics? The central power battery on Oa. Since the dawn of time. It's symbolism.
@professorartoo@JimHalpert11198 Embracing fear is like the whole thing of being a GL. You can't truly overcome fear without embracing it. That's what Hal meant by "Don't be afraid to be afraid"
For a Yellow Lantern "using fear" means drawing power from instilling fear, which is not what John is doing at all.
@DotoDoya Quippiness aside, I'm interested to see where the plot goes. John felt mostly right to me, especially in the flash forward. I'm reserving judgement on Hal until we know more about what's going on because he feels off, but it seems like it's being done for a reason.
@Verliswolf@G0ffThew You promote YOUR reading of the official rules and YOUR idea of "legitimate" play.
You get a negative reaction because you behave as if your views on the matter are immutable truth and that for anyone to disagree is an unforgivable moral failure.
Hope this helps.
@TylerAtTheAxis I think part of what happened is that people went in expecting a movie based on Mario, and instead Nintendo wanted to make a Mario game distilled into movie. For better or worse, they focused on the things that people love about Mario games, and the story isn't high on that list.
@CONEY This feels like it's almost certainly a backdoor pitch for a knockoff Pokemon "project" he will announce in a few months that turns out to just be another crypto scam.
@Buhzae He's so good. The $30 for the ADHD module of Dr. K's guide is super worth it imo. Totally changed my understanding of what ADHD actually is and how it works.
@CosmonautMarcus People think that good game = impactful game, but that's not how it works.
Rockstar makes incredible games, but SF2 clears their whole catalog by itself in terms of impact on the industry. Same with RE. Arguably even DMC, Mega Man, etc.
@imESAM It's like 90% people with no understanding of how basic economics works.
Games were never going to stay $60 forever. Every year they stayed at $60 their actual price effectively went down. That was always going to become unsustainable at some point.
It's really funny that Trump knows so little about Christianity that he didn't realize that the types of extremists that want a "Faith Office" also largely don't believe that women are allowed to be pastors.
@CosmonautMarcus It's growing up
on social media that did it, specifically post-Twitter social media. It removes nuance from any situation in everyone's rush to not be on the "wrong" side of things. Everything that CAN be bad IS bad 100% of the time, and all "bad" things are equally severe.