The Blue Whistler

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Rach4Patriarchy I agree with him that in some circumstances it is appropriate to vote for demon-rats but Flipick Flopentes doesn't have any principles.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Rach4Patriarchy Really? Is this the point where you start questioning whether to take him seriously?

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Scott_Weidig @washingtonpost Pardon the profanity but people like you are the biggest cowards. There should be nothing wrong with livestreaming it if there is no issue with it.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Joshua_the_car I agree but for different reasons!

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@marzan04 @Kaizerrev I hope it's completely other way around.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Kaizerrev Fishback needs some serious education about Flipick Flopentes.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@AFpost This is an understandable view if you have seen only a couple of clips of Flipick Flopentes. I hope he will be educated about this issue and comes to his senses.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@permabulla Pure narcissism, nothing more. The real problem is only that Flipick Flopentes can't take any criticism.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@ActualSnape Unlike Mr. Flipick Flopentes!

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@ActualSnape I know that it must be shocking for children like you to discover this but it is a valuable life lesson: PEOPLE JUDGE OTHERS BASED ON FAR MORE FACTORS THAN SIMPLY WHO HAPPENS TO BE NICE TO THEM.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@fuzzmosis He also used to bash Crowder but as soon as Crowder praised him he changed his tune.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@fuzzmosis It's important to keep in mind that he is a narcissist. He only tears down people that dare to criticize him. The only two people he seems to like are Alex Jones and Dave Smith. Why? Because they never criticized him.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Chopped_Twink @goyimfarmer Imagine saying "cope" to Sgt. Hartman.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Chopped_Twink @goyimfarmer Suppose someone loses a competition and says, “I think the referee made several questionable decisions.” Perhaps they are making excuses. Perhaps they genuinely noticed something worth discussing. Perhaps both are true.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Chopped_Twink @goyimfarmer That response takes effort. It also has the advantage of being an actual argument.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Chopped_Twink @goyimfarmer A more intellectually serious response would be: “Those decisions were reviewed, and the calls were consistent with the rules,” or “The referee made mistakes, but they affected both sides equally.”

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Chopped_Twink @goyimfarmer Another reason “cope” is so weak is that it often relies on mind-reading.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Chopped_Twink @goyimfarmer Let me educate you. The word “cope” has become a popular shortcut in online arguments. Someone expresses disappointment, offers an explanation, questions a popular opinion, or simply disagrees with another person—and instead of addressing what they said, someone replies: “Cope.”

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Chopped_Twink @goyimfarmer When someone dismisses another person's position simply by declaring that they are “coping,” they have not demonstrated that the position is wrong. They have demostrated that their mind is smaller than Tuco Salamanca's cock.

[The Blue Whistler @LWPGuide]

@Chopped_Twink @goyimfarmer The problem is not that the word “cope” can never be used legitimately. People obviously do rationalize failures, losses, and uncomfortable facts. The problem is using “cope” as a substitute for an argument.