@Justanelectric1@VladSoriano@atrupar I don’t argue politics all day—check my posts. But the better question is, why are you OK with a billionaire with deep ties to China rifling through government databases? Why is that OK with you? https://t.co/RMLMJrd5Ps
So @Support won’t let me appeal a harassment report, their form rejects the case number THEY gave me, and now DMs are blocked unless I pay? How is this not intentional suppression of appeals?
@Support I tried appealing a harassment report, but X’s own system won’t accept the case number it gave me. How are users supposed to challenge bad moderation decisions when the appeal process is broken?
@Justanelectric1@VladSoriano@atrupar Clearances & system access follow strict rules—the president can’t just bypass the Privacy Act of 1974 or FISMA. For Musk to have legal access, Congress would need to pass a law, or he’d have to be hired, appointed, or contracted through proper channels. That hasn’t happened.
@Justanelectric1@VladSoriano@atrupar Actually, you’re wrong. The president can’t just give anyone access to government systems. Laws like the Privacy Act of 1974 and FISMA set strict rules on who can access federal data.
https://t.co/bGLJSp5vxQ
@Justanelectric1@VladSoriano@atrupar The executive branch can audit itself through Inspectors General or OMB. But bringing in Elon Musk and his people—who have no gov roles or authority—to access gov systems isn’t an audit. It’s unauthorized access. The real question is: what are they doing with that information?
@VladSoriano@atrupar An executive order can rename an existing agency, but it can’t unilaterally create new auditing powers or bypass Congress. Renaming something doesn’t grant it unchecked authority to conduct audits without legal oversight. That’s not ‘4D chess,’ it’s just how government works.
@VladSoriano@atrupar Official audits are done by authorized bodies with legal mandates and set standards. Auditors don’t just show up without oversight. DOGE isn’t real—no vote, no authority, just people acting like a department. That’s not how accountability works.
@HoopMixOnly In the 80s, Magic and Bird saved basketball. In the 90s, Jordan grew the game globally. In the 2010s, Steph Curry changed the way the game is played with the rise of the three-pointer.
@goshsmoke@937theFan Fair point—Tomlin might need to go eventually for a fresh start. But replacing him with Jon Gruden? A guy with 5 winning seasons and a .511 record? That’s not the solution.
@goshsmoke@937theFan 😂😂😂😂
Gruden’s last Raiders stint (2018–2021): 22–31, no playoffs. That 2002 Super Bowl? Largely due to Dungy’s defensive roster. After that, his teams were mediocre at best.
@spicoli_75@66cjg@leatherbrainz At some point, sure, you need a new HC for fresh ideas, but the hate on Tomlin’s 66% reg-season win % is ridiculous. Dude faces top-10 strength of schedule every yr because PIT is always a top-10 team. Debate change if you want, but the consistency under him is undeniable.
@spicoli_75@66cjg@leatherbrainz Between 2016 and 2025, the NFL head coaches with the most regular-season wins are:
1.Andy Reid: 112 wins
2.Bill Belichick: 98 wins
3.Sean Payton: 95 wins
4.Mike Tomlin: 94 wins
5.John Harbaugh: 91 wins