@BlockchainFXcom@BlockchainFXcom needs to update their UI. Some functions arenโt working right now, such as the unstaking feature. It worked before @BlockchainFXcom updated on their back-end.
The chance of @BlockchainFXcom getting listed on Uniswap and LBank are very likely as long as $BFX is not a rug pull.
1. Uniswap
Odds: 99% (Near Certainty)
Why: Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap are permissionless. The BlockchainFX team has explicitly tied their token launch timeline to hitting their $15M presale hard target. The moment the team deploys the smart contract and adds the corresponding liquidity pool to Uniswap, the token will be instantly tradeable there. Barring a complete project abandonment, this listing is practically guaranteed.
2. LBank
Odds: High (Very Likely)
Why: LBank operates as a prominent Tier-2 centralized exchange, known for aggressively onboarding high-momentum presale and micro-cap tokens. Given that $BFX has a broad retail participant base (reportedly over 25,000 participants) and has achieved substantial presale funding numbers, it represents exactly the kind of volume-generating asset LBank favors. The capital raised provides more than enough depth to clear LBank's listing fees and initial market-making requirements.
) center on claims that it is a rebranded or connected continuation of BlockDAG Network, run by the same anonymous or pseudonymous team, primarily involving Gurhan Kiziloz. https://t.co/drbiRfcE21 +1 Key Allegations Shared entity/leadership with BlockDAG: Multiple on-chain analyses and community investigations (including by ZachXBT and independent researchers) allege that presale funds from both projects flow into the same wallets and exchange deposit addresses (e.g., on BTSE and HTX). This suggests commingled operations rather than separate https://t.co/ROSMpAaifc +1 BlockDAG's history: BlockDAG raised significant funds (hundreds of millions claimed) via aggressive marketing, miner sales, and presales but faced widespread complaints about undelivered hardware, missing funds, and unfulfilled promises. ZachXBT and others have labeled it a high-risk or scam-like project, with funds allegedly redirected to unrelated ventures like gambling https://t.co/ZHmnXX8lFH Marketing similarities and tactics: Both projects use heavy promotional campaigns (sports sponsorships, influencers, referral bonuses), technical-sounding whitepapers heavy on existing ZK concepts, anonymous teams, and hardware sales (miners/Pods). ZKP launched while BlockDAG issues https://t.co/Fur1bvznjE Proof Pod delivery and value issues: Users (including in your posts and replies) report non-delivery or long delays on Proof Pods (hardware validators sold for ~$249+ with expensive software upgrades up to $30k claimed). Doubts exist on whether they perform meaningful decentralized compute or just serve as a fundraising https://t.co/9B8oBoErY1 Other red flags: Fully anonymous team (promised reveal June 1, 2026), no public smart contract audits, unverified $100M "self-funded" claims, Barcelona sponsorship controversy (club distanced itself from the token), and a presale/auction model criticized as opaque.(Zero Knowledge Proof /$ZKP
@ZKPofficial
(Zero Knowledge Proof / $ZKP) center on claims that it is a rebranded or connected continuation of BlockDAG Network, run by the same anonymous or pseudonymous team, primarily involving Gurhan Kiziloz.
https://t.co/drbiRfcE21 +1
Key Allegations
Shared entity/leadership with BlockDAG: Multiple on-chain analyses and community investigations (including by ZachXBT and independent researchers) allege that presale funds from both projects flow into the same wallets and exchange deposit addresses (e.g., on BTSE and HTX). This suggests commingled operations rather than separate https://t.co/ROSMpAaifc +1
BlockDAG's history: BlockDAG raised significant funds (hundreds of millions claimed) via aggressive marketing, miner sales, and presales but faced widespread complaints about undelivered hardware, missing funds, and unfulfilled promises. ZachXBT and others have labeled it a high-risk or scam-like project, with funds allegedly redirected to unrelated ventures like gambling https://t.co/ZHmnXX8lFH
Marketing similarities and tactics: Both projects use heavy promotional campaigns (sports sponsorships, influencers, referral bonuses), technical-sounding whitepapers heavy on existing ZK concepts, anonymous teams, and hardware sales (miners/Pods). ZKP launched while BlockDAG issues https://t.co/Fur1bvznjE
Proof Pod delivery and value issues: Users (including in your posts and replies) report non-delivery or long delays on Proof Pods (hardware validators sold for ~$249+ with expensive software upgrades up to $30k claimed). Doubts exist on whether they perform meaningful decentralized compute or just serve as a fundraising https://t.co/9B8oBoErY1
Other red flags: Fully anonymous team (promised reveal June 1, 2026), no public smart contract audits, unverified $100M "self-funded" claims, Barcelona sponsorship controversy (club distanced itself from the token), and a presale/auction model criticized as opaque.
Since they blocked me from exposing their scams. I will share it instead. @blockdagnetwork and @ZKPofficial are the same scam entities. Do not buy from them. You'll lose 99% of your money.
@ZKPofficial And for those who didn't know they are the same scammers again pictures below ๐. Do not buy a proof pod, it will never or maybe after 2 years deliverd. And the question is, can you use it...