I hate Netflix, love America, and collects lib tears. I use this account when a Lib is so triggered they abuse reporting or a troll complains about a block 😂
@ZenArchist_@StephenBRogers2@thedooosh Yes. We know you are embarrassing yourself posting photoshopped pictures to try and prove your point.
Now THATS embarrassing
@MD06070@thedooosh@X_Matt_X_@andrei__roman You called him delusional for saying favorability and vote intention can diverge.
Then spent 10 tweets showing… favorability and vote intention diverging.
You proved the gap exists.
You just never figured out what that meant.
@ConInsurgent@thedooosh@MichM_M_@LibertyLockPod@Jackson32988 No. He’s not. EO 13526 is the legal standard for classification of national security information.
If you’re claiming something is classified, you start there, not with “joint pubs” or doctrine manuals of agencies, which are subordinate to executive orders.
@RealChetBLong @thedooosh@securitydog56@SenSchumer So you don’t have anything of value, law, or logic to add to the discussion?
You just keep using emotional appeals and then block when you get destroyed in an argument?
Definitely Air Force 🤣
@KingKhah@thedooosh@kuubiker@EYakoby You’re* a retard.
You don’t know what the First Amendment does, you can’t argue without deflecting, and you’re out here making typos while trying to call someone else an idiot.
Pick up a civics book before you embarrass yourself again.
@t_f_bow@Tradwife2222@thedooosh@BadLegalTakes You’re a coward that blocks people when you get owned.
Yet brag about being blocked by so many people.
Typical libtard. Never can take the heat. Always here’s an intervention and save
@USConstAmendXIV@BK_McCallum@deluracct@iamthedriving@thedooosh @SuitMooseEsq @SpudmanWP@BadLegalTakes What is incredible is that you think this proves your point but it proves ours 😂
You said they’re DUAL citizens meaning they have actual citizenship and pledged allegiance to the sovereign of the US, which would make them eleigivle for birthright citizenship under Elk & WKA 💀
@USConstAmendXIV@BK_McCallum@deluracct@iamthedriving@thedooosh @SuitMooseEsq @SpudmanWP@BadLegalTakes You’re trying to contort the text into saying something it plainly does not.
If your interpretation were correct, it would mean foreign ministers—who are explicitly excluded—wouldn’t be considered foreigners or aliens. That’s nonsense.
The distinction rests on allegiance