@Partisangirl@HothaAli The Saudi state promoted and sponsored the books of Muhammad Ibn Abdulwahhab prior to this so what exactly is this supposed to change lol
@siren_bunny2 لان كشف العورات ذريعة إلى فعل الفاحشة الين تصير العادة بالتدرج يا ذكية فكلامي منطقي جدا. ما حترد علي لأنك اساساً ما عندك رد يوافق الدين لأنه يبدو ان بغضكم ل��جال الدين اعظم من حبكم لله.
I hope my point is clear
@ab1_wa@YasirAlHanafi Firstly, the authenticity of this Hadith hasn’t been agreed upon. Is it valid for one who doesn’t believe this hadith is authentic to criticize the rulers? Secondly, you yourself don’t hold on to thr apparent meaning of the Hadith. You say it’s valid…
@ab1_wa@YasirAlHanafi The first Hadith says obey your ruler, the second Hadith says don’t revile your ruler, the third one says don’t demean your ruler, and the fourth one says don’t insult. Where on earth does it say you can’t publicly criticize a ruler that does haram in public?
@ab1_wa@YasirAlHanafi Insulting Muslims is forbidden in general and not limited to Muslim rulers, will you then claim that speaking out against Asharis, Maturidis, and deviants to be forbidden?
@Haqiqatjou Perhaps Al-Fawzan hasn’t seen clear evidence that he’s an Alawite, or that it wouldn’t be wise. Aren’t you the same person that said you’ve never visited Makkah or Madinah despite Hajj being one of the five pillars? So if we should assume the best for you then why not him?