THE STAR CAST OF 61 INDIAN "CIVIL" SOCIETY THAT HAVE WRITTEN TO MODI-SHARIF DEMANDING AN END TO "OP SINDOOR".
None of these people have any qualms about sharing space with separatists who don't recognise the Indian Constitution or giving Pak a breather. None have written a letter calling upon Pak to "end continued hostilities" against PoK Kashmiris, Indian innocents. None.
At least 40+ people have died in France in the last week due to extreme heat. France24, one of the alleged red-green cabal infiltrated media cartel, has still not done a news piece titled "40+ poor people die in Macron's France." like they do for "Modi's India."
All French media did news on "extreme heat" in India just a month ago. And Indian media haven't covered the heat waves in Europe and how they are suffering without AC and dying. This is India's failing.
There must be a balance. Also, offense is the best defense. If India wants to shut their nonsense about India at the behest of their anti-India globalist, islamist and communist sponsors and editors, Indian media must focus on bringing all the dirt out about these countries.
Indian media need to cover just one crime, rape, accident from EU, US, and China everyday in India. Program 1.4 billion Indians against how bad things are. The way they do against India everyday. What INC used to do to Indians against the US, China, Pak one time.
The strategy will be extremely effective at shutting these foreign state media constantly doing negative stories on India. Even if not, it will ensure Indians understand it's not like only in India everything is the worst.
'इस्लाम अपनाते ही SC/ST एट्रोसिटी एक्ट के तहत मिलने वाली सुरक्षा खत्म', बॉम्बे HC का अहम फैसला
बॉम्बे हाईकोर्ट की कोल्हापुर बेंच ने एक महत्वपूर्ण फैसले में कहा है कि इस्लाम धर्म अपनाने के बाद किसी व्यक्ति को अ��ुसूचित जाति/जनजाति (SC/ST) अत्याचार निवारण कानून के तहत संरक्षण नहीं मिलता.
पूरी खबर: https://t.co/nVodOHBavB
#BombayHighCourt | @JournoVidya
Since 2016, the Mayor of London has been Sadiq Khan, a second-generation Pakistani immigrant and devout Muslim. The current Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, is also a Pakistani Muslim. The leader of the Scottish Labour Party, Anas Sarwar, is a Pakistani Muslim. There are currently 26 Muslim Members of Parliament, 4 Muslim members of the Scottish Parliament, including the former First Minister of Scotland, Humza Yousaf. 2 members of the Welsh Parliament are Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman, is a Muslim. The Mayor of the London Borough of Newham, Rokhsana Fiaz, is a Muslim. 2 London Assembly Members are Muslim. 18 peers in the House of Lords are Muslim. And in 2025, at least 8 ceremonial mayors, who do not wield executive power but whose role is to normalise the Islamisation of Britain, were Muslim.
The UK, however, is not only run by its politicians but also by its civil service and the army of administrators at every level of the state apparatus and civil society. Placing a Muslim in charge of Britain’s capital city for a decade is one very obvious way to implement the Islamisation of Britain. Placing a Muslim in the office of Home Secretary is another. Placing a Muslim at the head of Ofsted is another. But the infiltration of the UK state by Muslims goes far beyond the scores of Muslims who now sit at the head of our councils, in the mayoralties of our cities, in our legislature and in the House of Lords.
It’s largely unknown to the general public, but Muslims have created a network of political, civil, military, legal, police, media, educational, health, financial and charitable bodies working towards the Islamisation of the United Kingdom.
Within the UK’s Government and Civil Service there operate today the Home Office Islamic Network (HOIN), the FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development) Muslim Staff Network, the Civil Service Islamic Society (CSIS), the Civil Service Muslim Network (CSMN) and the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPACUK).
Within the UK military there operates the Armed Forces Muslim Association (AFMA).
Within the UK judiciary there operate the Association of Muslim Lawyers (AML), the Muslim Lawyers’ Hub and the Muslim Lawyers Action Group (MLAG).
Within the parallel Sharia judiciary there operate the Islamic Sharia Council (ISC), the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) and the Muslim Law (Sharia) Council.
Within the UK’s police forces there operate the National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP), the Association of Muslim Police (AMP) at the Metropolitan Police, the West Yorkshire Association of Muslim Police (AMP), the Scottish Police Muslim Association (SPMA) and the City of London Police Association of Muslim Police (AMP).
Within UK media there operate the BBC Muslim Network, the Channel 4 Muslim Network, the ITV Muslim Staff Network Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND), the Islam Channel, British Muslim TV, Muslim Television Ahmadiyya International (MTA International), the Ummah Channel, Ahlebait TV and 5Pillars.
Within the UK’s education sector there operate the Muslim Teachers’ Association UK (MTAUK), the Association of Muslim Schools and Institutes (AMSI), the British Muslim Teachers’ Association and the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS).
Within the UK’s health sector there operate the National Muslim Staff Network (NMSN) and the NHS Muslim Network.
Within the UK’s charities there operate the Islamic Relief UK, Muslim Hands UK, Muslim Aid, Ummah Welfare Trust (UWT), Muslim Global Relief, the National Zakat Foundation (NZF) and the Muslim Charity UK.
And within the parallel Sharia financial system there operate 5 fully Sharia-compliant banks (Al Rayan Bank, Gatehouse Bank, the Bank of London and the Middle East, United Bank Limited and the Ahil United Bank), as well as 25 conventional banks which offer Sharia finance alongside conventional finance.
Other nation-wide Islamic organisations operating in the UK include the Association of British Muslims (AoBM), the British Muslim Network (BMN), the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and the Islamophobia Response Unit.
In my book I look at how these various Muslim organisations and their financial backers in the Islamic world work together to lobby the UK Government and Members of Parliament to write and pass legislation that furthers the Islamisation of Britain.
The most recent example of the influence of such Muslim groups on UK legislation is the UK Government’s adoption of the definition of anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia written by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims. An organisation composed exclusively of Muslims, including 21 Muslim MPs and 5 Muslim Peers, this APPG is funded by the Aziz Foundation, a charity founded in 2015 by Asif Aziz, a Malawi-born Muslim property developer and billionaire whose company, Criterion Capital, has investments worth £6 billion in Britain, and who, since 2024, has been a tax exile in Abu Dhabi.
Another indication of how these Muslim organisations operate closer to the corridors of power — indeed, with the offices stationed off them — is the Civil Service Muslim Network, which lists, among its stated aims, the following:
•Represent, support, connect and champion Muslim civil servants across government.
•Generate a better understanding of Islam within the Civil Service and challenge discrimination and misconceptions.
•Create a network of senior allies who recognise the lived experience of Muslim colleagues and help improve religious literacy and respect.
Doubtless I’m not the only British person who cannot understand why such a network should be required in the UK if Britain is still a secular society rather than one, as I believe, that is already operating under aspects of Sharia law modelled on its implementation in Pakistan; or why it should not only be tolerated but given a place in our civil service, except as a platform — one of many built in Britain and largely with the taxes of the British people — for the Islamisation of Britain.
As for Muslim organisations operating within our police forces and legal system, it is contrary to the principle of police being officers of UK law, the adjudication of courts over sentencing under that law, and of everyone in Britain, irrespective of their religion, being equal before the law. The two-tier policing of the British people, the decades-long cover-up of the Muslim rape-gang network operating in 149 constituencies that we know of across Britain, and the gross travesties of justice handed down by these courts to Muslim rapists, murderers and terrorists is further confirmation that the UK is, indeed, already operating under Sharia law.
Like the UK’s 85 known Sharia Courts, which oversee child marriages in contravention of UK law, these Muslim associations, Muslim societies, Muslim committees, Muslim councils, Muslim non-governmental organisations, Muslim APPGs and Muslim networks have created a civil service, legal system and police force that operates within, but independent from and contrary to, the laws of the UK, which they seek to change through political lobbying of our Parliament and Government. Again, this is consistent with Sections 4 and 14 of Pakistan’s Enforcement of Sharia Act, 1991, according to which ‘Laws [are] to be interpreted in the light of Sharia, and ‘The State shall take adequate measures for the Islamisation of the judicial system.’
Finally — although this list doesn’t approach exhausting the influence of Islam in British society — in addition to these organisations there exists within Britain a terrorist arm with links to the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a transnational Sunni Muslim organisation that was founded in Egypt in 1928 to promote Islam and Sharia Law.
Fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood known to be currently operating in Britain include the Cambridge Education and Training Center Ltd., IMA6INE Ltd., Wembley Tree Ltd., Waslaforall, Future Graduates Ltd., Yas for Investment and Real Estate, Holdco UK Properties Limited and Nafel Capital Partners, all of which have recently been proscribed by the United Arab Emirates as terrorist groups. Indeed, most of the organisations I’ve listed here are linked by varying degrees of separation to the Muslim Council of Britain and the Muslim Association of Britain, which themselves have links to the Muslim Brotherhood.
It is a measure of how far Britain’s Islamisation has advanced that this organisation operates freely in the UK while being banned as a terrorist organisation in many Muslim countries, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Syria, Jordan, Kenya, Bahrain, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and the United Arab Emirates, as well as in Russia.
Extraordinarily, in January 2026 the UAE announced that it was excluding UK universities from its approved list for state scholarships, citing the risk of Emirati citizens being radicalised by the Muslim Brotherhood operatng on British campuses. Universities where networks linked to the Muslim Brotherhood are reported to operate include the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London, Queen Mary University of London, the University of Birmingham, the University of Manchester, the University of Leeds, the University of Bradford and the University of Newcastle. The same month, the US Department of State proscribed chapters of the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt, Lebanon and Palestine as designated terrorist organisations.
And there are consequences to harbouring and funding Islamic terrorists in the very country against which they launch their attacks. Six years ago, in 2020, there were 43,000 people on MI5’s terrorist watch list. After the mass migration of half a million Muslims to Britain and more than two-and-a-half years of weekly protests against the war in Gaza, the numbers can only have grown since then.
In 2024, Islamic terrorists accounted for 80% of UK police force’s counter-terror caseload. As of 31 March that year, 63% of prisoners in the UK arrested on terrorist-related charges were Islamic terrorists. Muslims have been responsible for 94% of all terrorism deaths, and 88% of terrorism-inflicted injuries, in Britain over the last 25 years. In the last 10 years, the percentages are even higher. One would never guess it from the relentless references to the threat from the mythical ‘far-Right’ by the UK Government and media, but MI5 today lists Islamic terrorism as ‘the most significant threat to the UK by volume’.
As anyone who has lived in Britain since 9/11 knows, this hasn’t happened overnight, and we have repeatedly ignored every warning to the contrary, as we continue to do today. In 2006, when the UK was led by the New Labour Government of Tony Blair and net migration to Britain had increased to over a quarter a million a year, the think-tank, Policy Exchange, published a report titled ‘When Progressives Treat With Reactionaries’, in which it argued that the British Foreign Office had already, in effect, become a front for The Muslim Brotherhood. Twenty years later, they have been proven right. Today, the UK is run by Muslims.
Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know just how far down the path to becoming an Islamic State Britain is, and what we, the British people, can do to stop it, please consider purchasing a copy of my book. The link is below.
https://t.co/kpQBeancvN
Dr @swapan55 inherits a Bengal wrecked by financial ruin (₹8 lac crore debt), anti-corporate policies (7,000 companies have taken flight), and insane mismanagement (₹5,800 crore for Minority Affairs versus ₹80 crore for Science & Tech).
But if anyone can, he can. Best wishes.
Perhaps you can begin by acquainting yourself with the history of northern India: one of invasions, marauders, and prolonged violence, and what it did to people’s lives and beliefs.
In hidden nooks, in quiet corners and the safety of our homes, we kept our faith alive.
You might then grasp the inconvenient truth: despite all of it, a culture and civilisation refused to be erased or decimated.
So your point about Hinduism being “extremely pleasant, prim and proper” in South India…
No, we didn’t have that luxury.
This is precisely my point.
Northern India preserved Hindu civilization despite repeated invasions, destruction and political upheaval.
Southern India preserved Hindu civilization through stable kingdoms, temple patronage, land grants and institutional continuity.
Different histories. Same outcome.
The temples of the South did not emerge because politics was absent.
They emerged because kings, communities and institutions made them a civilizational priority for centuries.
Whether in Kashi or Kanchipuram, faith survived because people fought to preserve it.
A response by @priya_27_ to The Wire’s malicious attempt to turn a criminal case into an indictment of NLSIU’s motto, “Dharmo rakṣati rakṣitaḥ.”
Read here:
https://t.co/ozverJQzXI
It doesn’t surprise me in the least that Americans can’t tell Indians, Pakistanis, Sikhs, Syrians, Libyans, Iraqis, or Afghans apart.
For a people so insular, even their next state passes for foreign territory.
What is far more telling is the British failure to make these distinctions.
For a country that once prided itself on knowing its colonies down to the last ethnographic detail, this studied ignorance is revealing.
It certainly sheds light on why the catch-all term “South Asian” becomes so conveniently elastic.
Especially when dealing with something as uncomfortable as the ‘grooming’ gang scandals.
There’s a certain symmetry to it. A country that once carved up their colonies along fault lines to maximise its own gain now appears increasingly unable to hold its own social fabric together.
Call it Karma, call it historical recoil but the irony is hard to miss: in dividing the world so efficiently, they may have forgotten how to preserve themselves.
Are Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism the most influential forces in the modern world, or is it Industrial capitalism?
Yesterday, we began our new course offering - Religious Literacy for a Polarized World by Rama Seshan @maa_bhaishiiH. Registrations have been extended till the weekend due to the overwhelming response: https://t.co/fA3moLmhvR
In this course, we will not merely study the religious traditions, but also examine provocative propositions, such as the idea that modern capitalism is not the absence of religion, but a new form of religion - one that emerged through the secularization of Protestant Christianity.
Decades before the UK grooming scandal, India suffered the 1992 Ajmer grooming and mass rape horror. Journalists and politicians hushed it up for fear of being branded Islamophobic. Children who were raped still do the rounds of courts to get justice. As grandmothers.
My views:
Depth of Pakistan’s history is exactly 79 years.
The depth of India’s history, however, is is not measured in centuries but in millennia.
#Takhshila and Nalanda were not merely centres of learning, but luminous markers of civilisation that engaged with knowledge at a time when the rest of the world was still in intellectual infancy.
The irony is, Mr Ambassador that the heritage Pakistan takes pride in today stands largely disconnected from these civilisational wonders.
It certainly grabbed the geography, not the continuity.
The 1967 diplomatic horror that Congress erased from history.
When China falsely accused young Indian diplomats K. Raghunath and P. Vijay of spying over a simple photo, they were dragged by their necks, stripped, and brutally beaten by a mob of Red Guards on a Beijing runway.
Red Guards beat and kicked two Indian diplomats in wild scenes at Peking airport to-day before they left by air for Hongkong after being expelled from China accused of spying.
The Second Secretary Mr Krishnan Raghunath and the Third Secretary, Mr. P. Vijay were dragged and pushed, held by the neck and arms among a crowd of Red Guards several hundred strong.
They were punched and kicked and Red Guards waved red books of Mao Tse-tung’s quotations at them. Other Indian diplomats were hit and Third Secretary,
C.V. Ranganathan was made to bow his head by the crowd who tried to force him to kneel on the runway.
Embassy staff who tried to go to the aid of the two expelled, diplomats were manhandled and kept away.
The response from the ruling Congress government? Utter paralysis. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi openly admitted in Parliament that it was “not possible… to outline the steps the government might take.”
From the complete surrender of 1967 to the 2008 secret MoU signed with the Chinese Communist Party with Rahul Gandhi right at the table the paper trail of appeasement is clear.
Who are the Indians actually destroying India's image spreading Pakistani anti-India propaganda? They need to introspect. Doing it for politics and profits is not worth it.
Honoured to receive The Order of the White Double Cross (1st Class) in Bratislava this evening. My gratitude to the people and Government of Slovakia for this honour, which belongs to the 140 crore people of India. I dedicate this award to the enduring friendship between India and Slovakia.
@PellegriniP_