Mahendrasingh

Retweets are not endorsement.

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

This raises serious concerns about the Home Minister’s role in July 20 Police Brutality case. He must be held accountable. Every life is precious. A student lost his vision for life at the Home Minister’s order! Answer now.

[Mahendrasingh @Mahendrasingh_S]

@mkvenu1 This is problem. Public assurances were not taken in writing. Verbal assurances has no legal basis. That is the reason Supreme Court could give contradictory order. Looks like it was a ploy to end the protest.

[Dhruv Rathee Satire @DhruvRatheNx]

यह सिर्फ एक वीडियो नहीं, एक लड़की की टूटी हुई आवाज़ है।

"यह मेरे लिए मानसिक रूप से बेहद थका देने वाला रहा है" दादर प्रदर्शन के दौरान पुलिस वैन के सामने खड़ी हुई मुंबई की मॉडल रिया अहिर अब इंसाफ की गुहार लगा रही हैं।

[J Gopikrishnan @jgopikrishnan70]

Ha ha ha.... Govt informs Parliament that Agriculture Minister of State Bhagirath Choudhary returns subsidy of Rs. 99 lakh he took for his own farm ... Returns subsidy after Indian Express expose 😁https://t.co/mu4w9W0GYK

[Mahendrasingh @Mahendrasingh_S]

@JohnBrittas This is the only way to fight with them. Keep it up 👍

[John Brittas @JohnBrittas]

What blatant arrogance!..

Police are arriving to make arrests wearing neither uniforms nor nameplates, and the Delhi Police have barged into a political party office without permission. This hasty action against one of the faces of the students agitation, former JNU Students' Union President and SFI leader @aishe_ghosh is purely retaliation for her leading the historic protest that forced the Central Government to yield. The Central Government is issuing outright threats, declaring that all participants of the Jantar Mantar demonstration will be sent to prison

#neetprotest #aishe

[ANI @ANI]

#WATCH | Delhi: Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) Founder Abhijeet Dipke says, "...The youth were protesting for their future. They were not getting any thrill out of it, they braced lathis on 20th July. If the Govt is not satisfied with just that, with that bloodshed and if it continues to harass students, we will hit the streets soon."

[Ashutosh Ranka @AshutoshRanka]

If anything happens to @aishe_ghosh, the government will see a protest like never before.

Stop harassing our team. Honour your words.

[Vrinda Grover @vrindagrover]

Meet your new education minister, Prahlad Joshi.
According to him release of Bilkis Bano gang rapists and mass murders by Gujarat govt. was as per law.
Sir, Supreme Court found that their release was in grave breach of law and sent them right back to jail.
Prahlad Joshi you need tuition in law and ethics.

[Sushant Singh @SushantSin]

Of course, all the rights can only be denied to scholars like Umar Khalid.

[Ashutosh Ranka @AshutoshRanka]

I have been told that ABVP goons are waiting at Rajasthan University to create ruckus and vandalise the event.

While I would not expect anything less from ABVP, it remains to be seen how @RajPoliceHelp handles this out.

[Mahendrasingh @Mahendrasingh_S]

You know what surprises me is that the agitation was withdrawn without written assurance. In my opinion, that was a blunder. Oral assurances have no meaning in law.Also, everyone is aware of the credibility of this govt. We have experienced Kisan Aandolan &a few other agitations.

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

🚨URGENT STATEMENT🚨

The interim order passed by the Supreme Court of India in the batch of PILs related to the CJP protest must ring alarm bells across the country. In particular, Direction No. 4, which permits governments to proceed with existing FIRs and carry out investigations, raises extremely serious concerns.

This direction stands in direct contradiction to the solemn assurance and guarantee extended by the Government of India to the youth of this nation on 25 July 2026, namely, that the FIRs would be withdrawn and that no protester would be directly or indirectly targeted for participating in the peaceful movement.

It was on the strength of that solemn assurance, and in complete good faith, that the Cockroach Janta Party called off its nationwide protest.

We now have a credible apprehension that the Government of India and BJP-ruled states may seek to use and weaponise this order of the Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant to continue FIRs against individual protesters and subject them to great harassment. This was precisely our concern from day one: that courts could be used, directly or indirectly, to achieve political ends by targeting peaceful dissent.

Equally troubling is the fact that the interim order was not opposed by the government's lawyers, despite the Central Government being fully aware that talks/assurances with the CJP had continued until as recently as late last night and that a solemn agreement had already been arrived at on 25 July.

The court's uninformed order is therefore wholly unacceptable.

A solemn public assurance given to thousands of young students and protesters cannot be diluted, undermined, or rendered meaningless through subsequent legal developments, in a surreptitious manner. It only results in breach of public trust.

In any event, nothing in the interim order prevents the Government of India or the concerned BJP/NDA ruled State Governments from withdrawing the FIRs or deciding not to proceed against peaceful protesters, like done by Bihar and Assam governments. The power to withdraw or not pursue such cases continues to rest with the executive. The court has not mandated that governments must definitely continue with the FIRs. That would be a deliberate misreading. The Government must not invoke the Court’s order as a justification for reneging on the commitment it made on 25 July.

We therefore demand that the Government of India and the concerned BJP/NDA State Governments immediately place the terms of this solemn assurance before the Supreme Court in the pending proceedings so that there is complete transparency regarding the commitments already made to the youth of this country and so that the court can withdraw and make an informed order in the future.

The youth of India entered into this understanding in good faith. That good faith must not be betrayed. Institutions of constitutional importance must never be politicised and weaponised to not honour the guarantees.

The deadline for the Government of India to honour its guarantees expires today. We once again call upon it to fulfil every commitment it made: withdraw the FIRs, ensure that no protester is subjected to future punitive action, and honour both the letter and the spirit of the assurance that brought an end to the protest.

Failing this, and as previously declared, the Cockroach Janta Party will have no option but to resume its nationwide protest to protect the students and young protesters who stood up not for themselves alone, but for the future of this nation. A government that breaks its word cannot expect the youth to remain silent. If the guarantees are dishonoured, the streets of India will once again become the voice of its young.

[Mahendrasingh @Mahendrasingh_S]

@SauravDassss You know what surprises me is that the agitation was withdrawn without written assurance. In my opinion, that was a blunder. Oral assurances have no meaning in law.Also, everyone is aware of the credibility of this govt. We have experienced Kisan Aandolan &a few other agitations.

[Saurav Das @SauravDassss]

🚨URGENT STATEMENT🚨

The interim order passed by the Supreme Court of India in the batch of PILs related to the CJP protest must ring alarm bells across the country. In particular, Direction No. 4, which permits governments to proceed with existing FIRs and carry out investigations, raises extremely serious concerns.

This direction stands in direct contradiction to the solemn assurance and guarantee extended by the Government of India to the youth of this nation on 25 July 2026, namely, that the FIRs would be withdrawn and that no protester would be directly or indirectly targeted for participating in the peaceful movement.

It was on the strength of that solemn assurance, and in complete good faith, that the Cockroach Janta Party called off its nationwide protest.

We now have a credible apprehension that the Government of India and BJP-ruled states may seek to use and weaponise this order of the Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant to continue FIRs against individual protesters and subject them to great harassment. This was precisely our concern from day one: that courts could be used, directly or indirectly, to achieve political ends by targeting peaceful dissent.

Equally troubling is the fact that the interim order was not opposed by the government's lawyers, despite the Central Government being fully aware that talks/assurances with the CJP had continued until as recently as late last night and that a solemn agreement had already been arrived at on 25 July.

The court's uninformed order is therefore wholly unacceptable.

A solemn public assurance given to thousands of young students and protesters cannot be diluted, undermined, or rendered meaningless through subsequent legal developments, in a surreptitious manner. It only results in breach of public trust.

In any event, nothing in the interim order prevents the Government of India or the concerned BJP/NDA ruled State Governments from withdrawing the FIRs or deciding not to proceed against peaceful protesters, like done by Bihar and Assam governments. The power to withdraw or not pursue such cases continues to rest with the executive. The court has not mandated that governments must definitely continue with the FIRs. That would be a deliberate misreading. The Government must not invoke the Court’s order as a justification for reneging on the commitment it made on 25 July.

We therefore demand that the Government of India and the concerned BJP/NDA State Governments immediately place the terms of this solemn assurance before the Supreme Court in the pending proceedings so that there is complete transparency regarding the commitments already made to the youth of this country and so that the court can withdraw and make an informed order in the future.

The youth of India entered into this understanding in good faith. That good faith must not be betrayed. Institutions of constitutional importance must never be politicised and weaponised to not honour the guarantees.

The deadline for the Government of India to honour its guarantees expires today. We once again call upon it to fulfil every commitment it made: withdraw the FIRs, ensure that no protester is subjected to future punitive action, and honour both the letter and the spirit of the assurance that brought an end to the protest.

Failing this, and as previously declared, the Cockroach Janta Party will have no option but to resume its nationwide protest to protect the students and young protesters who stood up not for themselves alone, but for the future of this nation. A government that breaks its word cannot expect the youth to remain silent. If the guarantees are dishonoured, the streets of India will once again become the voice of its young.

[Dora @doraa_101]

Meet Indra Meghwal.
A 9 yr old Dalit boy from rajasthan, allegedly beaten to death by his own teacher.
His “crime”? Drinking water from a pot reserved for upper caste Hindus.

[M A Baby @MABABYCPIM]

The illegal attempt by the Delhi Police to enter the CPI(M) Headquarters, AKG Bhavan, to arrest SFI leader Aishe Ghosh is a dangerous assault on democratic norms.

The police arrived in a private vehicle, with some personnel not even in uniform. When CPI(M) MP @JohnBrittas and other comrades forcefully intervened and challenged them, they left without carrying out their illegal attempt. It is learnt that for the past several days, Aishe Ghosh has been continuously followed and surveilled, exposing a blatant campaign of intimidation against student leaders.

Such methods have no place in a democracy. The Modi government is using the police to criminalise dissent and silence those raising their voice against injustice instead of answering the legitimate concerns of students.

The CPI(M) strongly condemns this intimidation and reaffirms its solidarity with the student movement. We will resolutely resist every attempt to trample upon democratic rights.

[Live Law @LiveLawIndia]

#BREAKING: A writ petition has been filed in #SupremeCourt by @AARahimdyfi seeking a declaration that the use of indiscriminate biometric and facial surveillance in peaceful assemblies is unconstitutional and should be restrained until the Parliament enacts a law validating it.

[Manoj Arora @manoj_216]

Nitin Gadkari is confusing me.

Here are his two recent statements...

“Last night at 8 PM, I signed the file, finalising the regulations to legally authorise the use of 100% ethanol."

AND

"Ethanol policy was conceived and is being implemented by the petroleum ministry and not the transport ministry headed by me."

Why is he signing files if it is not his ministry?

[Mahendrasingh @Mahendrasingh_S]

@E20Party That's alright. But you don't get confused and asked for the resignation of both Puri And Gadkari.