@IronHorsey2000@McFaul@LindseyGrahamSC Also, can you truly say this is better than what was in place in January? What changed? Because the same Iranian “promises” you’ll say they are going to break, were in place then.
@IronHorsey2000@McFaul@LindseyGrahamSC Yes. Read it. Agreed with ambiguous timing. But much of it say “immediately”, and delimiters as to has to happen in 60 days. Additionally, they can sell oil until all sanctions are lifted, not 60 days.
Won’t be the IGRC breaking this, what even would they break, it would be us.
@IronHorsey2000@McFaul@LindseyGrahamSC Lol. Ok. We can agree to disagree, even though Trump publicly said differently.
I’m just going by literally the words of the MOU. Sanctions have to be lifted in 60 days, as does the mechanism for funding.
If that doesn’t happen, it’s not the IGRC breaking it - it’s us.
@IronHorsey2000@McFaul@LindseyGrahamSC Correct.But many parts go into effect immediately,and the rest,including all sanctions lifted and minimum of 300B(wtf cares where it comes from),have to be included in the final agreement,per the MOU,regardless of any performance.The IGRC will,because it completely benefits them.
@IronHorsey2000@McFaul@LindseyGrahamSC It is the final deal. It was signed. And they have an “ensured financing of at least 300 billion” hope that helps
@grablekelly05@BMeiselas Where did he say were paying it? The fact is, they are getting it. It’s more than double their gdp and 30x their defense spending, and now they’re getting it. Not to mention they can now sell oil for the first time in decades. Complete win!
@BenFranklin1171@PiersUncensored@piersmorgan@HagarChemali Who cares where it’s coming from. Their entire military budget is 9B. Their entire GDP is less than 300B. They are ensured at least 300B, from whomever. It’s an embarrassment.
@robrocks69 I have. And I’ve also seen the right do the same. And I’ve also seen daily lies about this type of stuff, so I’m not going to believe it until I see proof. Why have we not heard anything about the other attempts or prosecution?
@DaveHammon12948@lookner Ok snowflake. Hope you enjoyed getting owned l, not citing a thing, lying that you did, and not proving a thing!
Sources that show you’re wrong: polls, CSIS data, right wing communities, Twitter, real life anectdotes, eyes.
@DaveHammon12948@lookner Aligns with modern data that you refuse to prove. Got it. You’re what’s wrong with everything. Your entire provable argument is based on 34 people. Got it. Have a great day! You should change your byline to “getting owned by facts is my hobby”
@DaveHammon12948@lookner Actually I’m not. You keep saying a quarter of the political idealogy feels a certain way, which is directly refuted by the actual poll. It’s a quarter of 10 percent, which is 2.5 percent. Relative to the 1.5 percent portrayed by conservatives. Sucks to lose!
@DaveHammon12948@lookner That’s cute. You didn’t cite it. You gave a screenshot. I cited it, and will again here, and it directly refutes your screenshot.
Thanks for playing and losing now that you’re just repeating lies. Must hurt to lose. Have a great day
https://t.co/Ez90ylyasf