This is where the censorship legislation recently enacted in Canada will inevitably lead. This was the purpose.
It's never about protecting you or your children or anyone else. It's about protecting government; their narratives and their propaganda.
It's about sealing off the windows to the real world so you can still see it but you cannot communicate what you see loud enough for anyone to hear it.
There are hundreds if not thousands of people in Canada who have already been hauled in front of "human rights" tribunals and slapped with egregious fines for simply expressing opinions that conflict with Liberal narratives. In a not so distant future those people, and many more, will face 10 years to life in prison for the same thought crimes. That law has now been created in Canada.
You of course do not know any of these people's names because you're not supposed to. And as the digital dragnet continues, you will never know unless it's you who gets caught in it.
The Canadian government is losing control of the message
and its THEIR MAIN concern now
hence, the passage of C-22, C-9 as SOON as they got a majority.
Its a five alarm fire for them.
MSM is going extinct - independant outlets like Blacklocks, Juno and Rebel are rising.
This is crazy
Canadian ministry of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
wrote a memo to Minister Joly
outlining a plan to make themselves the literal Ministry of Truth, and then use government lawyers to sue people.
Justice Thomas dropped a TRUTH BOMB 🔥
"Men and boys with gender dysphoria are not women or girls, even if they believe that they are. Sex is an immutable 'biological' characteristic"
This was just on TV, while the CTV host was live on air in Toronto, look over her shoulder, a guy with his junk hanging out walking by.
This guy is no doubt walking near children at some point.
I submitted this parliamentary brief in 2024. Now co-signed by 47 academics.
"A Call to Abolish DEI from Canadian Federal Research Funding"
My conscientious objection to government-mandated racism has since cost me my research grant.
Consider signing on (link in reply).
CBC interrupted Pierre Poilievre’s press conference twice today
First interruption: legitimate live update on the earthquake in Venezuela. Fair enough
Second interruption: guest host Katie Nicholson drops a snarky remark, then Raffy Boudjukanian jumps in to CBCsplain how great Mark Carney is and how strong his polling numbers look
Raffy says Poilievre was doing "a lot of trying to paint the prime minister as someone who has failed to live up to those promises." What promises has he lived up to, Raffy?
Meanwhile, CBC carried Mark Carney’s full press conference completely uninterrupted
This isn’t an isolated mistake. It’s the same pattern we see constantly — cutting away from the Leader of the Opposition for dismissive comments (“last day of school energy,” anyone?) while giving others clean, uninterrupted airtime
Taxpayer-funded broadcaster. Real problem @brodiefenlon@CBCRaffy
Federal Liberal minister, Rebecca Alty, just got caught fabricating a fake CBC news headline.
A mocked-up image styled with the CBC logo, “breaking news” banner, and a headline that didn’t exist in any CBC publication.
The wording matched a federal government news release, not anything CBC ever wrote.
She got caught & her office quietly deleted the post.
Replaced it with a version that still looked like a news website, just without the CBC logo.
The office’s excuse: “the incorrect graphic was posted.”
The CBC’s response: “As the post in question no longer exists, we have no comment.”
This is a sitting federal Cabinet minister using fake mainstream media coverage to launder a government press release into the public mind.
It’s literally fake news.
As an FYI: it’s illegal, under the Canada Elections Act and Defamation Act, if she did this during a campaign.
Not to mention, it breaches every standard of public communication ethics during governance.
Are AI chatbots politically biased?
An analysis by the Washington Post tested leading AI chatbots, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini, using political prompts developed by researchers to evaluate responses to contentious public issues. The results suggested that chatbots displayed identifiable political leanings despite developer neutrality claims. These findings matter in Canada because Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, would create new compliance obligations for certain AI systems that could incentivize companies to monitor, retain, and analyze user inputs to demonstrate compliance — moving AI beyond simply answering questions and toward moderating and filtering interactions based on how the government wants you to understand the world.
https://t.co/Ii8Fnjb5da
Speak out against government-controlled AI by sending a pre-written letter to your MP opposing the C-34: https://t.co/PGIBFerCzQ