@raynalytics@THORChain This chart is mind-blowing. Uniswap generates ~95x THORChain’s fees.
Maybe I got it wrong: being cross-chain isn’t the biggest economic advantage. Maybe dominating liquidity and volume on a single chain is.
Am I missing something? 🤔
@RUNEBondApp My concern isn’t asset custody. It’s the attack surface around the frontend, wallet connections and transaction signing. History has shown that many “non-custodial” apps have still been compromised through these vectors.
@RUNEBondApp Maybe it’s just me, but I have a feeling that sooner or later someone will exploit a vulnerability through RuneBond. It’s honestly surprising that nothing has happened yet. I hope the team is taking security extremely seriously 😟
@RUNEBondApp Top priority: complete the bRUNE audit as fast as possible. Security first.
Also, reaching and activating the 40M cap should be a key milestone — it’s fundamental for THORChain’s tokenomics and long-term alignment.
That’s the feature we’d like to see next.
@RUNEBondApp@THORChain Got it — native RUNE can be split across operators. My point is bRUNE: it should stay simple (otherwise just bond directly). Since bRUNE is under audit, any timeline + 40M milestone update? Security + tokenomics clarity first!
@RUNEBondApp Yes, there’s demand.
The problem? No one can actually buy B-RUNE because the order book on Rujira is empty.
No liquidity = no market.
Another example of THORChain/Rujira infrastructure that looks good on paper but isn’t sustainable in practice. 🤷🏼♂️
@THORChain@solana@KyleSamani Sooooooooon! More than 2 years waiting for this integration! We can say that reliability is not a characteristic of @THORChain! 🤷🏼♂️🤦🏻♂️
@RujiraNetwork It’s a start, but 50k RUNE is ~0.01% of supply. Encouraging early traction, yet far from meaningful scale. Let’s see what happens once caps are lifted…