@LizzyStarrrdust@UsingLyft@WestsideLAGuy What he’s saying is the man is also providing loyalty, affection, caretaking, sex etc (what he highlights as ‘bare minimum’ though these are foundations) in addition to the above listed traits. So he’s basically what else is a woman providing in addition to that..?
@RealGame101 Through X you can pickup hatred/jealousy towards men /women. Comes through in tone, choice of words, subcommunication. Anyway, I like your chill natural way of txting. I txt similar to girls (not so matter of fact) and it works really well
@LizzyStarrrdust@BrandenL09@Pat_Stedman Agreed! But many men don’t think about this. Could you expand on the tons of stuff you can do within a monogamous relationship from your perspective? I think a lot of people would be very open to listening
@LizzyStarrrdust@Pat_Stedman If you’re not actually it’s the way you type, it comes across as adversarial. Very easy to pickup on. Anyway you have some good points that’s worth discussing and that’s a great goal to have
@LizzyStarrrdust@Pat_Stedman ‘Women do require novelty and excitement in order to maintain interest in sex’. Your posts often hold an adversarial men vs women tone and it seeps out. Regardless, both genders require novelty & excitement. I’d argue men moreso, hence why resistance to commitment occurs
@Pat_Stedman Given this: if a man wants a stable structure(monogamy) for his kids. Given that he has optionality himself & upholds boundaries (pushes back bad behavior). Is other womens desire for him & the threat of other women (he could have her) enough to satisfy female competitiveness?
@MarcheseMethods Ridiculously rare to here on X. Only a few people have mentioned this. The type you mentioned has some role to play eg goths with goths, gym bunnies choosing gym guys, finance bros & finance girls, but this is partly selecting for status & ultimately yes hot guys/girls are hot
@LizzyStarrrdust@Pat_Stedman The problem here is 'women actually do have a larger pool of potential mates'. Depends on the actual people in the relationship. People pair up with people of similar attractiveness (and age dependant) his pool actually increases while hers shrinks.
@9ineteen9 So are friendships, employers, employees. Just different roles. Friend, lover, acquaintance. You’re just pedestalizing the lover role (and therefore her), like its a special scarce resource. If anything, you should be checking if she’s the right person for the role for you.
@9ineteen9 It means you are looking at her as an employer, you are interviewing. Which is exactly the problem. This is not about game inner, outer, whatever concepts. You don’t need *something* for other people but you do for attractive women only. That’s the issue
@9ineteen9 So hanging out with your guy mates, colleagues, female friends, others is not an expression of your inner essence? Do you need game for them too? Is it only reserved for potential mates or do you feel you’re not enough, that you need to perform, be more for potential mates?
@9ineteen9 I never understood this. PUA has all these seperate categories you lose your sense of self: attraction, comfort, ASD, how do you deal with X? etc. How would you deal with it if it was your friend? It’s all social skills and ‘what do you want’. It’s overthinking taken to the max
@Pat_Stedman There are three guys who really know what they’re talking about. Similar principles communicated from different life experiences/outlooks. Pat Stedman, Yohami, Chase Amante
@DaysOfGame_com Of course man, eye contact, touch , humor, leading, all your behaviors are all real and attractive. It doesn’t undermine the effect preselection has (which is a phenomenon we don’t experience for women so find it hard to understand).