@Osint613 A Russian Kh-101 flew 100 km into a NATO country, blew up, left a 10-meter hole, and all we got was a team meeting and a scrambled jet that watched it happen. Still afraid to shoot down Russian missiles over Western Ukraine to protect NATO airspace? Weird.
@JulianRoepcke@NATO If a Russian missile can fly 94 km deep into NATO airspace with zero military response, "de-escalation" has officially become permission. Allowing aggressive regimes to test borders unpunished only guarantees the next missile flies deeper.
@Osint613 Notice how it's "I would like HIM to end the war" about the guy defending his country, not the dictator actively invading it. Putin could end this in 5 minutes by just going back to Russia. Silence on that part, though. Curious.
@Osint613 Cool, now apply that exact same logic to Moscow. Trying to appease dictatorial regimes and treat them like normal business partners always ends with them building missiles and invading neighbors. Every single time.
@basilaev_oloxoy There is nothing funnier than a Yakut who has forgotten his language and culture, speaking the language of the occupier and trying to please the Russian master.
@Osint613 Masterclass in geopolitics: let Tehran hit everyone else’s infrastructure without touching theirs. Brought to you by the "peace through strength" experts.
@Panchenko_X@LauraLoomer Who paid @Panchenko_X ?
Wait, so a billionaire buying luxury real estate in 2011, 2019, and 2024 somehow proves Western taxpayers funded it? Russian propaganda logic never fails: private capital exists, but only when it doesn't ruin a good anti-aid narrative, right?
@FoxNews Having massive energy reserves is a leverage point, yet China keeps buying cheap Russian and Iranian crude to fund their war machines while circumventing sanctions. Reserves mean nothing if autocratic regimes are left free to buy up global energy supplies to bankroll aggression.