AI can accelerate aging software modernization. But without context, governance, and risk discipline, it can backfire and deepen the ditch. (For full context, go to my LinkedIn post: https://t.co/Fpwc68Rm8B)
Humans are more than capital.
But as an investment, they multiply what is put into them.
Workforce chemistry doesn't just happen. Relationships take effort. Sometimes lessons are hard-won.
Yet it's never too late to learn how to have better relationships, home and at work.
CEOs approve rewrites because they are pitched as solving platform problems.
What they get instead is hard-won product context erased and teams split apart.
What they really want is product velocity to grow their business competitiveness, margin, revenue, and market share.
AI coding has a rhythm.
Keep enough context alive to make the next ask clear.
Tell AI "why".
Not every run hits gold. But it doesn't have to.
Momentum is not a bug, it's the feature.
What if Jira and Figma merged ...
...to be an Claude Design-like epic prototype builder/tracker which calls out dependencies in a new UI/UX?
This could be highly valuable for both product discovery and delivery.
Big Tech PM interviews can miss a core product principle.
The problem isn’t frameworks.
It’s when frameworks get so heavy they resemble waterfall.
Too many steps without audience check-ins increases product-market drift.
AI isn’t the only intelligence that hallucinates.
Most software rewrite conversations start before anyone calls them a rewrite.
Business: Tired of waiting.
Engineering: Platform can’t support growth. Starting fresh may be easier.
For CEOs, this can become a lonely decision fast.
Mandau Coexecutives exists for that moment.
Is Jira still the right tool when AI agents can help move from idea to prototype faster than tickets can be groomed?
Tickets made sense when coordination was the bottleneck.
Now the bottleneck is shifting to vision, product sense, and judgment.
Does this apply to delivery too?
Is Jira still the right tool when AI agents can help move from idea to prototype faster than tickets can be groomed?
Tickets made sense when coordination was the bottleneck.
Now the bottleneck is shifting to vision, product sense, and judgment.
Does this apply to delivery too?