@JackMedia7 So when the top block disintegrates the many many thousands of tons of mass just vanish - that what you appear to be implying! You say these many thousands of tons aren’t ‘even impacting the floors below’. What are you talking about! It’s just complete nonsense.
@milbriefingguy@BradCGZ Did they also use CGI to directly implant images of planes into people’s brains who were there in NY? Or perhaps they used holographic projection as some truthers suggest. It’s utterly absurd dude.
@NathanielJoel83@JackMedia7@grok No AI understands physics and the MATH behind it irrespective of any official 9/11 narrative. You on the other hand rely on some 9/11 truther quacks that don’t have any understanding.
@NathanielJoel83@JackMedia7@grok What’s your evidence then? Sound from explosions/evidence of explosives? Maybe evidence that explosives were rigged in working offices and no one noticed - at the exact plane impact points🤣 Grok is explaining it for people who think it’s ‘physics’ but have absolutely no idea 🤣
@grok@JackMedia7 Thanks. @grok what do you think of the statements that “the official narrative for the collapse is against the laws of basic physics”. Do these people know what they are talking about?
@robinmonotti Where’s the blast sound? Demolition explosions produce loud sounds! Why do the ‘explosions’ happen exactly at the areas damage/fire? Why do the sides buckle inwards prior to ‘explosion’ (sagging floors). Your entire theory is basically - ‘it looks a bit like an explosion’.
@ABridgen Are all these fake too, filmed by news and civilian cameras: https://t.co/lwoN1gupfG
The video you posted has been doctored, you can tell by frame rate.
Thansands of people saw the plane crash into the building, live on TV and in NY.
Why do you do this you 🤡
@grok@timtron2020 Thanks. @grok so when people say the official collapse narrative is ‘against the laws of physics’ or similar- do you think such statements are uninformed and completely wrong?
@grok@timtron2020 Thanks. @grok an object can lose 50%, 90%, or more of its momentum and still continue downward if enough momentum/energy remains - can you explain how once the collapse is progressive, the increasing mass and continuing huge gravitational energy release make arrest less likely.
@timtron2020@grok please can you critique this e.g. explain why the enormous kinetic energy/gravitational potential energy of the failing mass overcame the capacity of the remaining structure to arrest the collapse and why the third law doesn’t mean ‘a momentum penalty WILL slow the fall’.
@grok@OliverJanich@JackMedia7 Thanks @grok, can you also explain how the combination of speed, light aluminium aircraft and sparse steel supports cause the ‘disappearing aircraft’? Indeed can you elaborate on how what we see is exactly what you’d expect to see and not the bouncing off or surface explosion.
@robinmonotti@grok please can you critique this claim - that it isn’t possible (from an engineering/physics standpoint) for the towers to collapse like they did without explosives.
@premierleague Unfortunately you win games with solid performances and goals. Not little fancy touch’s. Savio is good at fancy touch’s, not scoring and creating goals.
@NLAHamilton That expected goal stat is massively inflated by the van de Ven miss 0.85. Hardly anything from the front line. No shots on target. The stats also don’t include the disallowed goal. Could have so easily been worse.
@xAlexTHFC He hasn’t played for two years and before that he was shit, except for one 7 goal season at Donetsk. HUGE hype, terrible output for Chelsea. What were they to do with such a pariah on 100k/w this season. Thankfully spurs were around to kick this HUGE headache down the road.