@PhatEmpire@tweetingboa@ValidScience People are encouraged to question science. I think the problem is when you have people who have no basic understanding of science thinking that questioning science means “I did my research” or think that science saying one thing today, and something else tomorrow, is a bad thing.
@tweetingboa@PhatEmpire@ValidScience We’re talking about public health. This is a serious topic that we need to get right. The details matter.
Literally hand-waving the fact that your conclusion only looks like reality when you squint doesn’t help anybody. Just to double check, the goal IS to help people right?
@tweetingboa@PhatEmpire@ValidScience It’s not “word games” to clarify the material difference between “conclude” and “suspect”.
For example: you publicly state that you think you should have chicken for dinner but privately you state that steak may be a good option too. Is conclusion or a suspicion?
@tweetingboa@PhatEmpire@ValidScience You said they drew the conclusion that it was a lab leak. That is incorrect. Even the article you linked says “suspected”.
Do the words “suspect” and “conclude” carry the same meaning to you?
@tweetingboa@PhatEmpire@ValidScience They did not draw the conclusion that it was a lab leak. Why lie about that when we have the diary proving this statement to be untrue? There’s plenty to criticize him and the administration’s handling of COVID for. But let’s stick to the facts?
@Chuck_Huber@ValidScience I think a lot of us just can’t take this kind of point seriously because it lacks even foundational understanding of statistics. It literally feels like we’re talking about calculus and you’re talking about addition. It’s not that you’re wrong, you’re an intellectual toddler.
@PhatEmpire@tweetingboa@ValidScience Science doesn’t measure truth, it draws conclusions using available data. Naturally, that means what scientists propose today may change tomorrow as new data is found. How do you propose leadership should handle this without creating widespread distrust?
@davidgaw@peterrhague I think we can be reasonable and say this is a grey area, rather than dealing in absolutes. AI isn’t a person, but at the present scale, it isn’t simply acting as a powerful autocomplete either. This seems like a topic worthy of great debate.
@JonHegreness_AZ@AbakpaJob I understand how you think our economy works, it’s just not accurate lol. It’s dumb to think that the exact amount someone is worth is how much they get paid, and if you accept that there are exceptions, then your premise is fundamentally untrue.
@DickBonnet@AbakpaJob You’ve just proven their argument though. Employer asks you “what have you done for me” not “did the market change”. Which is precisely the difference OP is pointing out.
@RoshaunK11928@AbakpaJob Why are you being so reductive? Clearly the discussion is about the inequality of power in these relationships. Pretending like my ability to ask for a raise is the same as the employer’s ability to just not give me one by default is delusional.
@JonHegreness_AZ@AbakpaJob I’m so tired of this naivety. It’s like you don’t even interact with real life, you just talk about a fantasy world where the market gives everyone exactly what they are worth.