@FORMidablefive For that is HUMANISM, to get as much people as possible to use the product not for it just being a center piece of a “good design. #twitwar2
@FORMidablefive But still that's only a minority, japan ISN’T THE WHOLE WORLD. The essence of what we're trying to say is that it is better to have more people use and appreciate a design. 1/2
@FORMidablefive Unfortunately, first impressions never last. Good looking as it may be, products that do not cater to the needs of humans are nonetheless useless, and have less or no value at all. Products that only look good , but does not perform as what the user intended, are of lesser value
@FORMidablefive but how will there have any impression without there even having looks???? there is no use for a product if NO ONE WILL BUY IT (FOR THE NTH TIME) #sadToSay#ReadAgain
@SystemicDesignr slr. systemic design more on following the principles of humanism as a basis. without us then there wouldn't even be a solid foundation for systemic design.
Design must be an innovative, highly creative, cross-disciplinary tool responsive to the needs of men. It must be research-oriented, and we must stop defiling the earth itself with poorly-designed objects and structures.
– Victor Papanek
@FORMidablefive Now if the cause will change over time, years and years from now then who again at the end of the day will buy the products years from now? The consumers right? The creators are the sole reasons for creating new trends but if the consumers see it as Fascism then there's no use.
Adolf Loos states that form is only validated when it brings out joy and purpose from the person. It is ultimately about the person benefiting and not the form itself, otherwise it only serves materialistic or economic purposes. (https://t.co/9OLkUnLI9e) #twitwar2